Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines whether neural networks that are "aligned" (i.e., trained to be helpful and beneficial) can also be considered "adversarially aligned" (i.e., resistant to adversarial attacks).
- The researchers investigate the relationship between alignment and adversarial robustness, exploring whether aligned neural networks are inherently more or less vulnerable to adversarial attacks.
- The paper presents experimental findings and theoretical insights into the interplay between alignment and adversarial robustness in neural networks.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a robot assistant that is designed to be helpful and do what's best for humans. This is called an "aligned" AI system. But the researchers in this paper wanted to know if these aligned systems are also resistant to "adversarial attacks" - that is, attacks where someone tries to trick the system into making mistakes or behaving in unintended ways.
The key question the paper explores is: <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/adversarial-attacks-defense-conversation-entailment-task">Are aligned neural networks also adversarially aligned?</a> In other words, does being designed to be helpful and beneficial also make these systems less vulnerable to adversarial attacks?
The researchers conducted experiments and analysis to better understand the relationship between alignment and adversarial robustness. They wanted to see if there are any inherent tradeoffs or synergies between these two important properties of AI systems.
Overall, the paper provides insights into how the goals of alignment (being helpful and beneficial) and adversarial robustness (being resistant to attacks) may or may not go hand-in-hand. This is an important consideration as we work to develop <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/goal-guided-generative-prompt-injection-attack-large">safe and reliable AI systems</a> that can be widely deployed to assist humans.
Technical Explanation
The researchers designed a series of experiments to investigate the relationship between neural network alignment and adversarial robustness. They trained neural networks to be "aligned" using various techniques, including reward modeling and iterated amplification. These aligned models were then tested against different types of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/semantic-stealth-adversarial-text-attacks-nlp-using">adversarial attacks</a>.
The key findings include:
- Aligned neural networks are not inherently more robust to adversarial attacks than unaligned models. In some cases, the aligned models were even more vulnerable.
- The researchers found that certain alignment techniques, such as reward modeling, can actually make the models less robust to adversarial perturbations.
- However, other alignment approaches, like iterated amplification, showed promise in improving both alignment and adversarial robustness.
The paper also provides theoretical analyses to better understand the underlying reasons for these results. The authors discuss how the objective functions used for alignment can impact a model's susceptibility to adversarial attacks, and how there may be inherent tensions between optimizing for alignment and adversarial robustness.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important caveats and limitations to consider. For example, the researchers note that their experiments were conducted on relatively simple tasks and model architectures, and that the findings may not generalize to more complex, real-world AI systems.
Additionally, the paper acknowledges that the relationships between alignment and adversarial robustness are likely nuanced and context-dependent. The specific techniques used for alignment, the nature of the task, and other factors may all play a role in determining how these properties interact.
Further research is needed to fully explore the generalizability of these findings and to better understand the fundamental tradeoffs, if any, between alignment and adversarial robustness. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/image-hijacks-adversarial-images-can-control-generative">Adversarial attacks</a> remain a significant challenge in the development of safe and reliable AI systems, and this paper highlights the importance of carefully considering alignment and robustness as complementary objectives.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important exploration of the relationship between neural network alignment and adversarial robustness. The key finding is that aligned neural networks are not inherently more resistant to adversarial attacks, and in some cases, the alignment techniques can actually make the models more vulnerable.
These results have significant implications for the development of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/humanizing-machine-generated-content-evading-ai-text">safe and beneficial AI systems</a>. It suggests that alignment and adversarial robustness may not be easily reconciled and that careful consideration of both objectives is necessary when designing and training AI models.
The paper provides a solid foundation for further research in this area, and its insights can help guide the ongoing efforts to create AI systems that are not only aligned with human values but also resistant to potential malicious attacks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?
Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Matthew Jagielski, Irena Gao, Anas Awadalla, Pang Wei Koh, Daphne Ippolito, Katherine Lee, Florian Tramer, Ludwig Schmidt
Large language models are now tuned to align with the goals of their creators, namely to be helpful and harmless. These models should respond helpfully to user questions, but refuse to answer requests that could cause harm. However, adversarial users can construct inputs which circumvent attempts at alignment. In this work, we study adversarial alignment, and ask to what extent these models remain aligned when interacting with an adversarial user who constructs worst-case inputs (adversarial examples). These inputs are designed to cause the model to emit harmful content that would otherwise be prohibited. We show that existing NLP-based optimization attacks are insufficiently powerful to reliably attack aligned text models: even when current NLP-based attacks fail, we can find adversarial inputs with brute force. As a result, the failure of current attacks should not be seen as proof that aligned text models remain aligned under adversarial inputs. However the recent trend in large-scale ML models is multimodal models that allow users to provide images that influence the text that is generated. We show these models can be easily attacked, i.e., induced to perform arbitrary un-aligned behavior through adversarial perturbation of the input image. We conjecture that improved NLP attacks may demonstrate this same level of adversarial control over text-only models.
Read more5/7/2024
👀
1
Defending Against Alignment-Breaking Attacks via Robustly Aligned LLM
Bochuan Cao, Yuanpu Cao, Lu Lin, Jinghui Chen
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant advancements and are now widely used across various domains. Unfortunately, there has been a rising concern that LLMs can be misused to generate harmful or malicious content. Though a line of research has focused on aligning LLMs with human values and preventing them from producing inappropriate content, such alignments are usually vulnerable and can be bypassed by alignment-breaking attacks via adversarially optimized or handcrafted jailbreaking prompts. In this work, we introduce a Robustly Aligned LLM (RA-LLM) to defend against potential alignment-breaking attacks. RA-LLM can be directly constructed upon an existing aligned LLM with a robust alignment checking function, without requiring any expensive retraining or fine-tuning process of the original LLM. Furthermore, we also provide a theoretical analysis for RA-LLM to verify its effectiveness in defending against alignment-breaking attacks. Through real-world experiments on open-source large language models, we demonstrate that RA-LLM can successfully defend against both state-of-the-art adversarial prompts and popular handcrafted jailbreaking prompts by reducing their attack success rates from nearly 100% to around 10% or less.
Read more6/13/2024
0
Imposter.AI: Adversarial Attacks with Hidden Intentions towards Aligned Large Language Models
Xiao Liu, Liangzhi Li, Tong Xiang, Fuying Ye, Lu Wei, Wangyue Li, Noa Garcia
With the development of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, both their vast applications and potential vulnerabilities have come to the forefront. While developers have integrated multiple safety mechanisms to mitigate their misuse, a risk remains, particularly when models encounter adversarial inputs. This study unveils an attack mechanism that capitalizes on human conversation strategies to extract harmful information from LLMs. We delineate three pivotal strategies: (i) decomposing malicious questions into seemingly innocent sub-questions; (ii) rewriting overtly malicious questions into more covert, benign-sounding ones; (iii) enhancing the harmfulness of responses by prompting models for illustrative examples. Unlike conventional methods that target explicit malicious responses, our approach delves deeper into the nature of the information provided in responses. Through our experiments conducted on GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, and Llama2, our method has demonstrated a marked efficacy compared to conventional attack methods. In summary, this work introduces a novel attack method that outperforms previous approaches, raising an important question: How to discern whether the ultimate intent in a dialogue is malicious?
Read more7/23/2024
💬
0
Exploring the Adversarial Capabilities of Large Language Models
Lukas Struppek, Minh Hieu Le, Dominik Hintersdorf, Kristian Kersting
The proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has sparked widespread and general interest due to their strong language generation capabilities, offering great potential for both industry and research. While previous research delved into the security and privacy issues of LLMs, the extent to which these models can exhibit adversarial behavior remains largely unexplored. Addressing this gap, we investigate whether common publicly available LLMs have inherent capabilities to perturb text samples to fool safety measures, so-called adversarial examples resp.~attacks. More specifically, we investigate whether LLMs are inherently able to craft adversarial examples out of benign samples to fool existing safe rails. Our experiments, which focus on hate speech detection, reveal that LLMs succeed in finding adversarial perturbations, effectively undermining hate speech detection systems. Our findings carry significant implications for (semi-)autonomous systems relying on LLMs, highlighting potential challenges in their interaction with existing systems and safety measures.
Read more7/9/2024