Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses

Overview

• This paper proposes a framework to systematically study prompt injection attacks, which aim to manipulate the output of large language models (LLMs) integrated into applications.
• Existing research has been limited to case studies, so this work aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of prompt injection attacks and potential defenses.
• The authors formalize a framework for prompt injection attacks, design a new attack based on their framework, and conduct a large-scale evaluation of 5 attacks and 10 defenses across 10 LLMs and 7 tasks.
• The goal is to establish a common benchmark for evaluating future prompt injection research.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are increasingly being used as part of applications to generate text, answer questions, and complete various tasks. However, these LLMs can be vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, where an attacker tries to inject malicious instructions or data into the input, causing the LLM to produce undesirable results.

Previous research on prompt injection attacks has been limited to individual case studies, so it's been difficult to get a comprehensive understanding of the problem and how to defend against these attacks. This new paper aims to change that by proposing a formal framework to describe and analyze prompt injection attacks.

Using this framework, the researchers were able to categorize existing prompt injection attacks as special cases, and they even designed a new attack that combines elements of previous ones. They then evaluated 5 different prompt injection attacks and 10 potential defenses across a wide range of LLMs and task domains.

The key contribution of this work is establishing a common benchmark for evaluating prompt injection attacks and defenses. This should help accelerate research in this area and lead to more robust and secure LLM-powered applications in the future.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by formalizing a framework for prompt injection attacks. This framework defines the key components of a prompt injection attack, including the target application, the prompt template used to interact with the LLM, the injection payload that the attacker attempts to insert, and the attack objective the attacker is trying to achieve.

Using this framework, the authors show that existing prompt injection attacks, such as those described in papers like PLEAK: Prompt Leaking Attacks Against Large Language Models, Assessing Prompt Injection Risks in 200 Customized GPTs, and Goal-Guided Generative Prompt Injection Attack on Large Language Models, can be viewed as special cases within their more general framework.

Moreover, the researchers leverage this framework to design a new prompt injection attack called the Compound Attack, which combines elements of existing attacks to potentially achieve more powerful and stealthy results.

To evaluate prompt injection attacks and defenses, the authors conducted a large-scale study involving 5 different attacks (including the new Compound Attack) and 10 potential defense mechanisms across 10 different LLMs and 7 task domains. This systematic evaluation provides a common benchmark for future research in this area.

The paper also introduces an open-source platform called Open-Prompt-Injection to facilitate further research on prompt injection attacks and defenses.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution by formalizing a framework for prompt injection attacks and conducting a comprehensive evaluation of both attacks and defenses. This helps address the limitations of previous research, which had been focused on individual case studies.

However, the authors acknowledge that their work is still limited in several ways. For example, they only evaluated a subset of possible prompt injection attacks and defenses, and their experiments were conducted in a controlled laboratory setting rather than the "wild" deployment environments that real-world applications would face.

Additionally, while the paper introduces a new Compound Attack, it doesn't provide a deep analysis of this attack or explore its full capabilities and potential impact. Further research would be needed to better understand the implications of this new attack vector.

Finally, the authors note that their framework and evaluation methodology may need to be updated as the field of prompt injection research continues to evolve, and as new attack and defense techniques are developed.

Conclusion

This paper takes an important step towards a more systematic understanding of prompt injection attacks against LLM-powered applications. By proposing a formal framework and conducting a large-scale evaluation, the authors have established a common benchmark for future research in this area.

The insights and tools provided by this work can help application developers and security researchers better identify and mitigate prompt injection vulnerabilities, ultimately leading to more robust and secure LLM-integrated systems. As LLMs become increasingly ubiquitous, this type of research will be crucial for ensuring the safe and reliable deployment of these powerful AI models.