OneEdit: A Neural-Symbolic Collaboratively Knowledge Editing System
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- A neural-symbolic collaborative knowledge editing system called OneEdit
- Allows users to easily edit and update knowledge graphs through natural language interactions
- Combines neural language models with symbolic reasoning to enable efficient and intuitive knowledge editing
Plain English Explanation
OneEdit is a new system that makes it easier for people to update and improve knowledge bases, or collections of facts and information. It combines powerful language models that can understand natural language with symbolic reasoning that can logically manipulate knowledge graphs.
The key idea is to allow users to simply describe the changes they want to make, and the system will figure out how to update the underlying knowledge graph accordingly. This is much more intuitive than having to directly edit complex knowledge representation formats.
For example, a user could say "Add that the capital of France is Paris" and OneEdit would understand the request and update the knowledge graph to reflect this new fact. The system can also handle more complex edits, like changing existing information or resolving conflicts, all through natural language interactions.
Technical Explanation
OneEdit uses a neural-symbolic architecture to enable collaborative knowledge editing. It leverages large language models that can understand and generate human-like text, combined with symbolic knowledge representation and reasoning capabilities.
The system takes in natural language requests for edits, which are processed by the language model to extract the relevant semantics. These are then translated into knowledge graph operations, which are executed to update the underlying knowledge base.
A key technical innovation is the use of a symbolic reasoning module that can efficiently apply edits while maintaining the consistency and integrity of the knowledge graph. This includes handling challenges like resolving conflicts between new and existing information.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of OneEdit through experiments on real-world knowledge bases, showing that it can enable intuitive and efficient knowledge editing compared to alternative approaches.
Critical Analysis
The OneEdit paper presents a promising approach for making knowledge editing more accessible and user-friendly. By bridging the gap between natural language and symbolic knowledge representations, it lowers the barrier for people to contribute to and maintain knowledge bases.
That said, the paper does not extensively explore the limitations and potential issues with the system. For example, it is unclear how OneEdit would handle more complex or ambiguous edit requests, or how well it would scale to very large knowledge bases.
Additionally, the reliance on pre-existing knowledge graphs means the system is still dependent on having a well-curated knowledge base to start with. Further research may be needed to explore ways to bootstrap knowledge editing from more diverse or incomplete sources.
Overall, OneEdit represents an important step forward in making knowledge engineering more accessible, but there is still room for improvement and further research to fully realize the potential of neural-symbolic collaboration for knowledge editing.
Conclusion
OneEdit introduces a novel neural-symbolic system that enables users to collaboratively edit knowledge bases through natural language interactions. By bridging the gap between human-readable language and formal knowledge representations, it lowers the barrier for people to contribute to and maintain shared knowledge.
The key innovations of OneEdit include its ability to translate natural language edit requests into knowledge graph operations, while maintaining the consistency and integrity of the underlying data. This represents an important step forward in making knowledge engineering more accessible and user-friendly.
While the paper highlights the potential of this approach, further research is needed to fully explore the limitations and scalability of the system. Nonetheless, the ideas presented in OneEdit hold promise for the future of collaborative knowledge management and editing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
OneEdit: A Neural-Symbolic Collaboratively Knowledge Editing System
Ningyu Zhang, Zekun Xi, Yujie Luo, Peng Wang, Bozhong Tian, Yunzhi Yao, Jintian Zhang, Shumin Deng, Mengshu Sun, Lei Liang, Zhiqiang Zhang, Xiaowei Zhu, Jun Zhou, Huajun Chen
Knowledge representation has been a central aim of AI since its inception. Symbolic Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and neural Large Language Models (LLMs) can both represent knowledge. KGs provide highly accurate and explicit knowledge representation, but face scalability issue; while LLMs offer expansive coverage of knowledge, but incur significant training costs and struggle with precise and reliable knowledge manipulation. To this end, we introduce OneEdit, a neural-symbolic prototype system for collaborative knowledge editing using natural language, which facilitates easy-to-use knowledge management with KG and LLM. OneEdit consists of three modules: 1) The Interpreter serves for user interaction with natural language; 2) The Controller manages editing requests from various users, leveraging the KG with rollbacks to handle knowledge conflicts and prevent toxic knowledge attacks; 3) The Editor utilizes the knowledge from the Controller to edit KG and LLM. We conduct experiments on two new datasets with KGs which demonstrate that OneEdit can achieve superior performance.
Read more9/14/2024
💬
0
EasyEdit: An Easy-to-use Knowledge Editing Framework for Large Language Models
Peng Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Bozhong Tian, Zekun Xi, Yunzhi Yao, Ziwen Xu, Mengru Wang, Shengyu Mao, Xiaohan Wang, Siyuan Cheng, Kangwei Liu, Yuansheng Ni, Guozhou Zheng, Huajun Chen
Large Language Models (LLMs) usually suffer from knowledge cutoff or fallacy issues, which means they are unaware of unseen events or generate text with incorrect facts owing to outdated/noisy data. To this end, many knowledge editing approaches for LLMs have emerged -- aiming to subtly inject/edit updated knowledge or adjust undesired behavior while minimizing the impact on unrelated inputs. Nevertheless, due to significant differences among various knowledge editing methods and the variations in task setups, there is no standard implementation framework available for the community, which hinders practitioners from applying knowledge editing to applications. To address these issues, we propose EasyEdit, an easy-to-use knowledge editing framework for LLMs. It supports various cutting-edge knowledge editing approaches and can be readily applied to many well-known LLMs such as T5, GPT-J, LlaMA, etc. Empirically, we report the knowledge editing results on LlaMA-2 with EasyEdit, demonstrating that knowledge editing surpasses traditional fine-tuning in terms of reliability and generalization. We have released the source code on GitHub, along with Google Colab tutorials and comprehensive documentation for beginners to get started. Besides, we present an online system for real-time knowledge editing, and a demo video.
Read more6/26/2024
🛠️
0
Exploring knowledge graph-based neural-symbolic system from application perspective
Shenzhe Zhu, Shengxiang Sun
Advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deep neural networks have driven significant progress in vision and text processing. However, achieving human-like reasoning and interpretability in AI systems remains a substantial challenge. The Neural-Symbolic paradigm, which integrates neural networks with symbolic systems, presents a promising pathway toward more interpretable AI. Within this paradigm, Knowledge Graphs (KG) are crucial, offering a structured and dynamic method for representing knowledge through interconnected entities and relationships, typically as triples (subject, predicate, object). This paper explores recent advancements in neural-symbolic integration based on KG, examining how it supports integration in three categories: enhancing the reasoning and interpretability of neural networks with symbolic knowledge (Symbol for Neural), refining the completeness and accuracy of symbolic systems via neural network methodologies (Neural for Symbol), and facilitating their combined application in Hybrid Neural-Symbolic Integration. It highlights current trends and proposes future research directions in Neural-Symbolic AI.
Read more5/31/2024
🧠
0
A Survey on Knowledge Editing of Neural Networks
Vittorio Mazzia, Alessandro Pedrani, Andrea Caciolai, Kay Rottmann, Davide Bernardi
Deep neural networks are becoming increasingly pervasive in academia and industry, matching and surpassing human performance on a wide variety of fields and related tasks. However, just as humans, even the largest artificial neural networks make mistakes, and once-correct predictions can become invalid as the world progresses in time. Augmenting datasets with samples that account for mistakes or up-to-date information has become a common workaround in practical applications. However, the well-known phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting poses a challenge in achieving precise changes in the implicitly memorized knowledge of neural network parameters, often requiring a full model re-training to achieve desired behaviors. That is expensive, unreliable, and incompatible with the current trend of large self-supervised pre-training, making it necessary to find more efficient and effective methods for adapting neural network models to changing data. To address this need, knowledge editing is emerging as a novel area of research that aims to enable reliable, data-efficient, and fast changes to a pre-trained target model, without affecting model behaviors on previously learned tasks. In this survey, we provide a brief review of this recent artificial intelligence field of research. We first introduce the problem of editing neural networks, formalize it in a common framework and differentiate it from more notorious branches of research such as continuous learning. Next, we provide a review of the most relevant knowledge editing approaches and datasets proposed so far, grouping works under four different families: regularization techniques, meta-learning, direct model editing, and architectural strategies. Finally, we outline some intersections with other fields of research and potential directions for future works.
Read more9/2/2024