Prompt engineering paradigms for medical applications: scoping review and recommendations for better practices

Overview

• The paper explores the use of prompt engineering in the medical domain, where specialized terminology and phrasing are crucial.
• It reviews 114 recent studies (2022-2024) on prompt learning (PL), prompt tuning (PT), and prompt design (PD) in medicine.
• PD is the most prevalent approach, and ChatGPT is the most commonly used large language model (LLM) for processing sensitive clinical data.
• Chain-of-Thought emerges as the most common prompt engineering technique.
• The paper provides recommendations to guide future research contributions in this area.

Plain English Explanation

Prompt engineering is the art of crafting the right input prompts to get large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT to produce the desired output. This is especially important in the medical field, where specialized terminology and phrasing are used.

The researchers reviewed 114 recent studies (from 2022 to 2024) that used prompt engineering in medicine. They looked at three main approaches:

1. Prompt Learning (PL): Training the LLM on a specific task by providing it with examples of good prompts.
2. Prompt Tuning (PT): Fine-tuning the LLM on a specific task by adjusting the prompt.
3. Prompt Design (PD): Carefully crafting the prompts to get the LLM to perform a specific task.

The researchers found that PD was the most common approach, used in 78 of the studies. They also noticed that in 12 papers, the terms PD, PL, and PT were used interchangeably, suggesting some confusion in the field.

Interestingly, the researchers found that ChatGPT, a popular LLM, was used in 7 papers to process sensitive clinical data. This is significant because ChatGPT was not designed to handle such sensitive information.

The most common prompt engineering technique used in the studies was "Chain-of-Thought," which involves breaking down a complex task into a series of simpler steps.

The researchers also noticed that while PL and PT studies typically provided a baseline for evaluating the prompt-based approaches, 64% of the PD studies did not have non-prompt-related baselines. This makes it difficult to assess the true impact of the prompt engineering techniques.

The paper concludes with recommendations to guide future research in this area, helping researchers and practitioners to better harness the potential of LLMs in the medical domain.

Technical Explanation

The paper reviewed 114 recent studies (2022-2024) that applied prompt engineering in the medical domain. The researchers categorized the studies into three main approaches:

1. Prompt Learning (PL): These studies focused on training the LLM on a specific task by providing it with examples of good prompts. This helps the model learn to generate relevant and effective prompts for that task.

2. Prompt Tuning (PT): These studies involved fine-tuning the LLM on a specific task by adjusting the prompt. This allows the model to better understand the nuances of the task and generate more accurate responses.

3. Prompt Design (PD): These studies focused on carefully crafting the prompts to get the LLM to perform a specific task. Researchers experimented with different prompt structures, phrasing, and formats to optimize the model's performance.

The researchers found that PD was the most prevalent approach, used in 78 of the 114 studies. Interestingly, in 12 papers, the terms PD, PL, and PT were used interchangeably, suggesting a lack of clarity in the terminology.

The study also revealed that ChatGPT, a popular LLM, was used in 7 papers to process sensitive clinical data, despite the fact that it was not designed for such tasks. This raises questions about the appropriateness and privacy implications of using ChatGPT in healthcare applications.

The researchers identified Chain-of-Thought as the most common prompt engineering technique, where the task is broken down into a series of simpler steps to guide the LLM's reasoning process.

The analysis also found that while PL and PT studies typically provided a baseline for evaluating the prompt-based approaches, 64% of the PD studies did not have non-prompt-related baselines. This makes it challenging to assess the true impact and effectiveness of the prompt engineering techniques.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive review of the current state of prompt engineering in the medical domain, highlighting both the progress and the areas that require further research and clarification.

One key limitation identified in the paper is the lack of non-prompt-related baselines in a significant number of the Prompt Design (PD) studies. This makes it difficult to determine the true impact of the prompt engineering techniques and how they compare to other approaches. Future research should aim to include more robust baseline comparisons to better evaluate the efficacy of prompt engineering in the medical field.

Another concern raised by the paper is the use of ChatGPT, a general-purpose LLM, to process sensitive clinical data. While the findings highlight the potential of LLMs in healthcare applications, there are valid concerns about data privacy and the appropriateness of using models not specifically designed for such tasks. Future work should explore the development of specialized LLMs or the use of privacy-preserving techniques, such as those discussed in this paper, to address these issues.

Additionally, the paper notes the lack of clarity in the terminology used to describe the different prompt engineering approaches (PL, PT, and PD). This could hinder the field's progress and make it challenging for researchers and practitioners to compare and build upon each other's work. Establishing a more consistent and well-defined taxonomy for prompt engineering techniques would be beneficial for the community.

Overall, the paper provides valuable insights into the current landscape of prompt engineering in the medical domain and highlights important areas for future research, such as improving baseline comparisons, addressing privacy concerns, and developing a more standardized terminology.

Conclusion

This comprehensive review of 114 recent studies on prompt engineering in medicine highlights the growing importance of this technique in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for specialized applications.

The findings reveal that Prompt Design (PD) is the most prevalent approach, with researchers carefully crafting prompts to optimize LLM performance. The use of ChatGPT, a general-purpose LLM, to process sensitive clinical data is a significant finding, raising questions about privacy and the need for specialized models.

The paper also identifies Chain-of-Thought as the most common prompt engineering technique, reflecting the importance of breaking down complex tasks into simpler steps to guide the LLM's reasoning.

While the review provides a valuable snapshot of the current state of the field, it also highlights areas for improvement, such as the need for more robust baseline comparisons and a more standardized terminology. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for advancing the field of prompt engineering in the medical domain and realizing the full potential of LLMs in healthcare applications.