Rethinking ChatGPT's Success: Usability and Cognitive Behaviors Enabled by Auto-regressive LLMs' Prompting

Read original: arXiv:2405.10474 - Published 5/20/2024 by Xinzhe Li, Ming Liu
Total Score

0

📶

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the usability and cognitive behaviors enabled by auto-regressive large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT through the lens of prompting.
  • The researchers explore how the prompting capabilities of these models can shape user experiences and influence the way humans interact with and perceive AI systems.
  • The paper delves into the cognitive processes and decision-making strategies that users employ when engaging with auto-regressive LLMs, highlighting the unique opportunities and challenges presented by this technology.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on understanding the success of chatbots like ChatGPT, which are powered by large language models (LLMs). These models can generate human-like responses to prompts, allowing users to have natural conversations.

The researchers examine how the way users interact with these models, through the process of "prompting," shapes their experiences and perceptions. Prompting refers to the specific instructions or questions users provide to the LLM, which then generates a response.

The paper explores the cognitive behaviors and decision-making strategies that users employ when engaging with these chatbots. For example, users may adapt their prompting style to elicit more useful or desired responses from the model. The researchers also consider the usability aspects of these systems, such as how intuitive and easy they are for users to interact with.

By understanding the interplay between prompting, user experiences, and the cognitive processes involved, the paper aims to provide insights into the success and potential of auto-regressive LLMs like ChatGPT. This knowledge can help inform the design and development of more effective and user-friendly AI assistants.

Technical Explanation

The paper delves into the prompting capabilities of auto-regressive large language models (LLMs) and how they shape user experiences and cognitive behaviors. The researchers conducted a series of experiments to investigate the usability and decision-making strategies employed by users when interacting with these models.

The study involved observing and analyzing the prompting techniques used by participants as they engaged with a chatbot powered by an LLM. The researchers examined factors such as the length, complexity, and specificity of the prompts, as well as the users' adaptations to elicit desired responses from the system.

Furthermore, the paper explores the cognitive processes underlying the users' interactions, including their mental models, problem-solving strategies, and the ways in which they leverage the LLM's capabilities to accomplish their goals. The researchers also consider the impact of factors like trust, transparency, and user expectations on the overall user experience.

Through this comprehensive analysis, the paper provides insights into the unique challenges and opportunities presented by auto-regressive LLMs, such as their ability to engage in open-ended dialogue and their potential for personalization. The findings suggest that the prompting process plays a crucial role in shaping the user experience and the perceived capabilities of these AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful analysis of the usability and cognitive behaviors enabled by auto-regressive LLMs, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.

One key limitation is the restricted scope of the study, which focuses primarily on the prompting process and user interactions with a single chatbot system. The researchers acknowledge that additional research is needed to explore how these findings translate to other LLM-powered applications, such as personalized recommendation systems or multimodal systems that integrate text, images, and other modalities.

Furthermore, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential ethical and societal implications of these technologies, such as concerns around emotional manipulation or the impact on human decision-making and problem-solving abilities. While the researchers acknowledge these issues, further exploration would be valuable to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the broader implications of auto-regressive LLMs.

Additionally, the paper could have benefited from a more critical examination of the limitations and potential biases inherent in the LLM technology itself, as these factors can directly influence the user experience and the cognitive processes observed in the study.

Overall, the paper offers a solid foundation for understanding the interplay between prompting, user experiences, and cognitive behaviors, but additional research is needed to fully capture the complexity and nuances of this rapidly evolving field of AI.

Conclusion

This paper provides valuable insights into the usability and cognitive behaviors enabled by auto-regressive large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. By examining the prompting process and the ways users interact with these systems, the researchers offer a deeper understanding of the unique opportunities and challenges presented by this technology.

The findings suggest that the prompting capabilities of LLMs play a crucial role in shaping user experiences, influencing the cognitive processes and decision-making strategies employed by users. This knowledge can inform the design and development of more effective and user-friendly AI assistants, as well as guide further research into the broader implications of these systems.

As the field of AI continues to evolve, the insights from this paper can contribute to a more holistic understanding of the interplay between human-AI interaction, user experiences, and the cognitive capabilities of advanced language models. This understanding can help unlock the full potential of auto-regressive LLMs while addressing the ethical and societal concerns that arise from their deployment.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📶

Total Score

0

Rethinking ChatGPT's Success: Usability and Cognitive Behaviors Enabled by Auto-regressive LLMs' Prompting

Xinzhe Li, Ming Liu

Over the last decade, a wide range of training and deployment strategies for Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged. Among these, the prompting paradigms of Auto-regressive LLMs (AR-LLMs) have catalyzed a significant surge in Artificial Intelligence (AI). This paper aims to emphasize the significance of utilizing free-form modalities (forms of input and output) and verbal free-form contexts as user-directed channels (methods for transforming modalities) for downstream deployment. Specifically, we analyze the structure of modalities within both two types of LLMs and six task-specific channels during deployment. From the perspective of users, our analysis introduces and applies the analytical metrics of task customizability, transparency, and complexity to gauge their usability, highlighting the superior nature of AR-LLMs' prompting paradigms. Moreover, we examine the stimulation of diverse cognitive behaviors in LLMs through the adoption of free-form text and verbal contexts, mirroring human linguistic expressions of such behaviors. We then detail four common cognitive behaviors to underscore how AR-LLMs' prompting successfully imitate human-like behaviors using this free-form modality and channel. Lastly, the potential for improving LLM deployment, both as autonomous agents and within multi-agent systems, is identified via cognitive behavior concepts and principles.

Read more

5/20/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Exploring the Capabilities of Prompted Large Language Models in Educational and Assessment Applications

Subhankar Maity, Aniket Deroy, Sudeshna Sarkar

In the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the fusion of large language models (LLMs) offers unprecedented opportunities for innovation in the field of modern education. We embark on an exploration of prompted LLMs within the context of educational and assessment applications to uncover their potential. Through a series of carefully crafted research questions, we investigate the effectiveness of prompt-based techniques in generating open-ended questions from school-level textbooks, assess their efficiency in generating open-ended questions from undergraduate-level technical textbooks, and explore the feasibility of employing a chain-of-thought inspired multi-stage prompting approach for language-agnostic multiple-choice question (MCQ) generation. Additionally, we evaluate the ability of prompted LLMs for language learning, exemplified through a case study in the low-resource Indian language Bengali, to explain Bengali grammatical errors. We also evaluate the potential of prompted LLMs to assess human resource (HR) spoken interview transcripts. By juxtaposing the capabilities of LLMs with those of human experts across various educational tasks and domains, our aim is to shed light on the potential and limitations of LLMs in reshaping educational practices.

Read more

5/21/2024

RePrompt: Planning by Automatic Prompt Engineering for Large Language Models Agents
Total Score

0

RePrompt: Planning by Automatic Prompt Engineering for Large Language Models Agents

Weizhe Chen, Sven Koenig, Bistra Dilkina

In this past year, large language models (LLMs) have had remarkable success in domains outside the traditional natural language processing, and people are starting to explore the usage of LLMs in more general and close to application domains like code generation, travel planning, and robot controls. Connecting these LLMs with great capacity and external tools, people are building the so-called LLM agents, which are supposed to help people do all kinds of work in everyday life. In all these domains, the prompt to the LLMs has been shown to make a big difference in what the LLM would generate and thus affect the performance of the LLM agents. Therefore, automatic prompt engineering has become an important question for many researchers and users of LLMs. In this paper, we propose a novel method, textsc{RePrompt}, which does gradient descent to optimize the step-by-step instructions in the prompt of the LLM agents based on the chat history obtained from interactions with LLM agents. By optimizing the prompt, the LLM will learn how to plan in specific domains. We have used experiments in PDDL generation and travel planning to show that our method could generally improve the performance for different reasoning tasks when using the updated prompt as the initial prompt.

Read more

6/18/2024

Large Language Models Enable Automated Formative Feedback in Human-Robot Interaction Tasks
Total Score

0

Large Language Models Enable Automated Formative Feedback in Human-Robot Interaction Tasks

Emily Jensen, Sriram Sankaranarayanan, Bradley Hayes

We claim that LLMs can be paired with formal analysis methods to provide accessible, relevant feedback for HRI tasks. While logic specifications are useful for defining and assessing a task, these representations are not easily interpreted by non-experts. Luckily, LLMs are adept at generating easy-to-understand text that explains difficult concepts. By integrating task assessment outcomes and other contextual information into an LLM prompt, we can effectively synthesize a useful set of recommendations for the learner to improve their performance.

Read more

5/28/2024