Small Language Models: Survey, Measurements, and Insights

Read original: arXiv:2409.15790 - Published 9/25/2024 by Zhenyan Lu, Xiang Li, Dongqi Cai, Rongjie Yi, Fangming Liu, Xiwen Zhang, Nicholas D. Lane, Mengwei Xu
Total Score

0

Small Language Models: Survey, Measurements, and Insights

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Small language models (SLMs) are a growing area of interest in the field of natural language processing (NLP).
  • This paper provides a comprehensive survey, measurement, and analysis of SLMs.
  • Key topics include SLM architecture, datasets, training, performance, and potential applications.

Plain English Explanation

SLMs are a type of machine learning model that are trained on large amounts of text data to understand and generate human language. Unlike the massive "large language models" (LLMs) that have gained a lot of attention, SLMs are much smaller in size and may have fewer capabilities.

However, SLMs can still be very useful for a variety of applications, such as answering questions, generating text, and understanding context. They can also be more efficient and easier to deploy than their larger counterparts.

This paper takes a deep dive into the world of SLMs, examining their architecture, the datasets used to train them, and how their performance compares to larger models. The goal is to provide researchers and practitioners with a better understanding of the capabilities and limitations of these smaller but potentially more practical language models.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by introducing the concept of SLMs and why they are an important area of study. It then delves into the specific details of SLM architecture, datasets, and training approaches. This includes discussions of model size, training data, and various optimization techniques used to improve SLM performance.

Next, the paper presents extensive measurements and benchmarking of SLM performance across a range of natural language processing tasks. This includes evaluating SLMs on metrics like perplexity, accuracy, and inference speed, and comparing them to larger language models.

The paper also explores potential applications and use cases for SLMs, highlighting areas where their smaller size and focused capabilities may be advantageous, such as in edge computing or personalized language modeling.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-researched examination of SLMs, but it does acknowledge some important caveats and limitations. For example, the authors note that the performance of SLMs can be heavily influenced by the specific datasets and training approaches used, and that further research is needed to fully understand their capabilities and limitations.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into some of the potential ethical or societal implications of SLMs, such as their potential misuse or the potential for biases to be amplified in smaller models. These are areas that warrant further exploration and discussion.

Overall, however, this paper represents a valuable contribution to the growing body of research on SLMs and their role in the broader landscape of language modeling and natural language processing.

Conclusion

This comprehensive survey, measurement, and analysis of small language models (SLMs) provides valuable insights into the current state of this emerging field. By examining SLM architecture, datasets, training approaches, and performance, the paper offers researchers and practitioners a deeper understanding of the capabilities and limitations of these smaller language models.

While SLMs may not match the raw power of large language models, the paper suggests that they can still be highly useful in a variety of applications, particularly where efficiency, personalization, or specialized capabilities are important. As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, the insights and findings presented in this paper will likely play a key role in guiding future research and development of SLMs and their applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Small Language Models: Survey, Measurements, and Insights
Total Score

0

New!Small Language Models: Survey, Measurements, and Insights

Zhenyan Lu, Xiang Li, Dongqi Cai, Rongjie Yi, Fangming Liu, Xiwen Zhang, Nicholas D. Lane, Mengwei Xu

Small language models (SLMs), despite their widespread adoption in modern smart devices, have received significantly less academic attention compared to their large language model (LLM) counterparts, which are predominantly deployed in data centers and cloud environments. While researchers continue to improve the capabilities of LLMs in the pursuit of artificial general intelligence, SLM research aims to make machine intelligence more accessible, affordable, and efficient for everyday tasks. Focusing on transformer-based, decoder-only language models with 100M-5B parameters, we survey 59 state-of-the-art open-source SLMs, analyzing their technical innovations across three axes: architectures, training datasets, and training algorithms. In addition, we evaluate their capabilities in various domains, including commonsense reasoning, in-context learning, mathematics, and coding. To gain further insight into their on-device runtime costs, we benchmark their inference latency and memory footprints. Through in-depth analysis of our benchmarking data, we offer valuable insights to advance research in this field.

Read more

9/25/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

What is the Role of Small Models in the LLM Era: A Survey

Lihu Chen, Gael Varoquaux

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in advancing artificial general intelligence (AGI), leading to the development of increasingly large models such as GPT-4 and LLaMA-405B. However, scaling up model sizes results in exponentially higher computational costs and energy consumption, making these models impractical for academic researchers and businesses with limited resources. At the same time, Small Models (SMs) are frequently used in practical settings, although their significance is currently underestimated. This raises important questions about the role of small models in the era of LLMs, a topic that has received limited attention in prior research. In this work, we systematically examine the relationship between LLMs and SMs from two key perspectives: Collaboration and Competition. We hope this survey provides valuable insights for practitioners, fostering a deeper understanding of the contribution of small models and promoting more efficient use of computational resources. The code is available at https://github.com/tigerchen52/role_of_small_models

Read more

9/14/2024

Small Language Models for Application Interactions: A Case Study
Total Score

0

Small Language Models for Application Interactions: A Case Study

Beibin Li, Yi Zhang, S'ebastien Bubeck, Jeevan Pathuri, Ishai Menache

We study the efficacy of Small Language Models (SLMs) in facilitating application usage through natural language interactions. Our focus here is on a particular internal application used in Microsoft for cloud supply chain fulfilment. Our experiments show that small models can outperform much larger ones in terms of both accuracy and running time, even when fine-tuned on small datasets. Alongside these results, we also highlight SLM-based system design considerations.

Read more

6/3/2024

Can Small Language Models Learn, Unlearn, and Retain Noise Patterns?
Total Score

0

Can Small Language Models Learn, Unlearn, and Retain Noise Patterns?

Nicy Scaria, Silvester John Joseph Kennedy, Deepak Subramani

Small Language Models (SLMs) are generally considered to be more compact versions of large language models (LLMs), typically having fewer than 7 billion parameters. This study investigates the ability of small language models to learn, retain, and subsequently eliminate noise that is typically not found on the internet, where most pretraining datasets are sourced. For this, four pre-trained SLMs were utilized: Olmo 1B, Qwen1.5 1.8B, Gemma 2B, and Phi2 2.7B. The models were instruction-tuned without noise and tested for task execution with in-context learning. Afterward, noise patterns were introduced to evaluate the models' learning and unlearning capabilities. We evaluated the models' performance at various training levels. Phi consistently excelled with word-level noise but performed the worst with character-level noise. Despite being the smallest with approximately 1 billion parameters, Olmo performed consistently well on tasks.

Read more

7/2/2024