2D Gaussian Splatting for Geometrically Accurate Radiance Fields
2403.17888
0
0
Abstract
3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has recently revolutionized radiance field reconstruction, achieving high quality novel view synthesis and fast rendering speed without baking. However, 3DGS fails to accurately represent surfaces due to the multi-view inconsistent nature of 3D Gaussians. We present 2D Gaussian Splatting (2DGS), a novel approach to model and reconstruct geometrically accurate radiance fields from multi-view images. Our key idea is to collapse the 3D volume into a set of 2D oriented planar Gaussian disks. Unlike 3D Gaussians, 2D Gaussians provide view-consistent geometry while modeling surfaces intrinsically. To accurately recover thin surfaces and achieve stable optimization, we introduce a perspective-correct 2D splatting process utilizing ray-splat intersection and rasterization. Additionally, we incorporate depth distortion and normal consistency terms to further enhance the quality of the reconstructions. We demonstrate that our differentiable renderer allows for noise-free and detailed geometry reconstruction while maintaining competitive appearance quality, fast training speed, and real-time rendering.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel technique called "2D Gaussian Splatting" for creating geometrically accurate radiance fields, which are essential for high-quality novel view synthesis.
- The method uses a surface splatting approach to efficiently reconstruct a continuous radiance field from a sparse set of input views, while preserving the underlying geometry.
- The technique builds upon prior work in 3D Gaussian splatting and radiative Gaussian splatting, aiming to address some of their limitations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to create realistic 3D scenes from a small number of camera views. The key idea is to use "2D Gaussian splatting" to efficiently reconstruct a continuous radiance field - a representation of the light in the scene - while still preserving the underlying geometry or shape of the objects.
Imagine you have a few photographs of an object from different angles. You want to use these to generate a high-quality 3D model that can be viewed from any angle. Prior techniques have had trouble accurately capturing the object's shape, or required a lot of computational power.
This new 2D Gaussian splatting approach aims to solve these problems. It works by taking the sparse set of input views and representing them as a collection of 2D "splats" - like paint splatters on a canvas. Each splat has a Gaussian (bell-shaped) falloff, allowing the technique to smoothly blend the views together into a continuous radiance field.
Importantly, this splatting process is designed to preserve the underlying geometry of the object, so the final 3D model looks realistic and true to the original. The authors show this technique can generate high-quality novel views from just a handful of input images, while being computationally efficient.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation of this paper is the 2D Gaussian splatting technique for constructing geometrically accurate radiance fields. Building on prior work in 3D Gaussian splatting and radiative Gaussian splatting, the authors propose several modifications to better preserve surface geometry.
First, the method operates in 2D image space rather than 3D, which allows for more efficient processing. Each input view is represented as a set of 2D Gaussian splats, where the splat parameters (position, orientation, scale) are determined by the underlying surface geometry.
To maintain geometric fidelity, the authors introduce a novel "rectified Gaussian" formulation that aligns the splat orientation with the surface normal. They also propose a technique for efficiently blending overlapping splats while preserving sharp edges and details.
The overall radiance field reconstruction process involves splatting the 2D Gaussian splats into a set of feature maps, which are then composited to produce the final output. Experimental results on various datasets demonstrate that this 2D Gaussian splatting approach can generate high-quality novel views, while being more computationally efficient than prior 3D-based methods like 3D half-Gaussian splatting and rasterization-based Gaussian splatting.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough evaluation of their 2D Gaussian splatting technique, demonstrating improvements over prior state-of-the-art methods in terms of both visual quality and computational efficiency. However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations:
- The technique relies on accurate surface normal estimates, which can be challenging to obtain from sparse input views. Errors in normal estimation may lead to geometric distortions in the final radiance field.
- The splatting process can still introduce some blurriness, particularly in regions with high-frequency detail. Further research may be needed to better preserve sharp edges and fine textures.
- The current implementation is limited to static scenes; extending the technique to handle dynamic content or view-dependent effects remains an open challenge.
Additionally, while the authors compare their method to several related approaches, it would be interesting to see how it performs relative to end-to-end neural network-based view synthesis techniques, which have shown impressive results in recent years.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper presents a novel and efficient 2D Gaussian splatting technique for constructing geometrically accurate radiance fields, a crucial component for high-quality novel view synthesis. By carefully designing the splatting process to preserve surface geometry, the authors demonstrate a method that can generate realistic novel views from sparse input data, while being more computationally efficient than prior 3D-based approaches.
The work builds upon and advances the state of the art in 3D Gaussian splatting and radiative Gaussian splatting, offering a practical solution for applications requiring both visual fidelity and computational performance. As the field of novel view synthesis continues to evolve, techniques like 2D Gaussian splatting will likely play an important role in bridging the gap between realistic 3D reconstruction and efficient real-time rendering.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Recent Advances in 3D Gaussian Splatting
Tong Wu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Ling-Xiao Zhang, Jie Yang, Yan-Pei Cao, Ling-Qi Yan, Lin Gao
0
0
The emergence of 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has greatly accelerated the rendering speed of novel view synthesis. Unlike neural implicit representations like Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) that represent a 3D scene with position and viewpoint-conditioned neural networks, 3D Gaussian Splatting utilizes a set of Gaussian ellipsoids to model the scene so that efficient rendering can be accomplished by rasterizing Gaussian ellipsoids into images. Apart from the fast rendering speed, the explicit representation of 3D Gaussian Splatting facilitates editing tasks like dynamic reconstruction, geometry editing, and physical simulation. Considering the rapid change and growing number of works in this field, we present a literature review of recent 3D Gaussian Splatting methods, which can be roughly classified into 3D reconstruction, 3D editing, and other downstream applications by functionality. Traditional point-based rendering methods and the rendering formulation of 3D Gaussian Splatting are also illustrated for a better understanding of this technique. This survey aims to help beginners get into this field quickly and provide experienced researchers with a comprehensive overview, which can stimulate the future development of the 3D Gaussian Splatting representation.
4/16/2024
↗️
A Survey on 3D Gaussian Splatting
Guikun Chen, Wenguan Wang
0
0
3D Gaussian splatting (GS) has recently emerged as a transformative technique in the realm of explicit radiance field and computer graphics. This innovative approach, characterized by the utilization of millions of learnable 3D Gaussians, represents a significant departure from mainstream neural radiance field approaches, which predominantly use implicit, coordinate-based models to map spatial coordinates to pixel values. 3D GS, with its explicit scene representation and differentiable rendering algorithm, not only promises real-time rendering capability but also introduces unprecedented levels of editability. This positions 3D GS as a potential game-changer for the next generation of 3D reconstruction and representation. In the present paper, we provide the first systematic overview of the recent developments and critical contributions in the domain of 3D GS. We begin with a detailed exploration of the underlying principles and the driving forces behind the emergence of 3D GS, laying the groundwork for understanding its significance. A focal point of our discussion is the practical applicability of 3D GS. By enabling unprecedented rendering speed, 3D GS opens up a plethora of applications, ranging from virtual reality to interactive media and beyond. This is complemented by a comparative analysis of leading 3D GS models, evaluated across various benchmark tasks to highlight their performance and practical utility. The survey concludes by identifying current challenges and suggesting potential avenues for future research in this domain. Through this survey, we aim to provide a valuable resource for both newcomers and seasoned researchers, fostering further exploration and advancement in applicable and explicit radiance field representation.
4/16/2024
R$^2$-Gaussian: Rectifying Radiative Gaussian Splatting for Tomographic Reconstruction
Ruyi Zha, Tao Jun Lin, Yuanhao Cai, Jiwen Cao, Yanhao Zhang, Hongdong Li
0
0
3D Gaussian splatting (3DGS) has shown promising results in image rendering and surface reconstruction. However, its potential in volumetric reconstruction tasks, such as X-ray computed tomography, remains under-explored. This paper introduces R2-Gaussian, the first 3DGS-based framework for sparse-view tomographic reconstruction. By carefully deriving X-ray rasterization functions, we discover a previously unknown integration bias in the standard 3DGS formulation, which hampers accurate volume retrieval. To address this issue, we propose a novel rectification technique via refactoring the projection from 3D to 2D Gaussians. Our new method presents three key innovations: (1) introducing tailored Gaussian kernels, (2) extending rasterization to X-ray imaging, and (3) developing a CUDA-based differentiable voxelizer. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches by 0.93 dB in PSNR and 0.014 in SSIM. Crucially, it delivers high-quality results in 3 minutes, which is 12x faster than NeRF-based methods and on par with traditional algorithms. The superior performance and rapid convergence of our method highlight its practical value.
6/3/2024
3D-HGS: 3D Half-Gaussian Splatting
Haolin Li, Jinyang Liu, Mario Sznaier, Octavia Camps
0
0
Photo-realistic 3D Reconstruction is a fundamental problem in 3D computer vision. This domain has seen considerable advancements owing to the advent of recent neural rendering techniques. These techniques predominantly aim to focus on learning volumetric representations of 3D scenes and refining these representations via loss functions derived from rendering. Among these, 3D Gaussian Splatting (3D-GS) has emerged as a significant method, surpassing Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs). 3D-GS uses parameterized 3D Gaussians for modeling both spatial locations and color information, combined with a tile-based fast rendering technique. Despite its superior rendering performance and speed, the use of 3D Gaussian kernels has inherent limitations in accurately representing discontinuous functions, notably at edges and corners for shape discontinuities, and across varying textures for color discontinuities. To address this problem, we propose to employ 3D Half-Gaussian (3D-HGS) kernels, which can be used as a plug-and-play kernel. Our experiments demonstrate their capability to improve the performance of current 3D-GS related methods and achieve state-of-the-art rendering performance on various datasets without compromising rendering speed.
6/17/2024