Attitudes Towards Migration in a COVID-19 Context: Testing a Behavioral Immune System Hypothesis with Twitter Data
2405.14043
0
0
๐งช
Abstract
The COVID-19 outbreak implied many changes in the daily life of most of the world's population for a long time, prompting severe restrictions on sociality. The Behavioral Immune System (BIS) suggests that when facing pathogens, a psychological mechanism would be activated that, among other things, would generate an increase in prejudice and discrimination towards marginalized groups, including immigrants. This study aimed to test if people tend to enhance their rejection of minorities and foreign groups under the threat of contagious diseases, using the users' attitudes towards migrants in Twitter data from Chile, for pre-pandemic and pandemic contexts. Our results only partially support the BIS hypothesis, since threatened users increased their tweet production in the pandemic period, compared to empathetic users, but the latter grew in number and also increased the reach of their tweets between the two periods. We also found differences in the use of language between these types of users. Alternative explanations for these results may be context-dependent.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The study examines how the COVID-19 pandemic affected people's attitudes towards marginalized groups, such as immigrants, on Twitter in Chile.
- It looks at the differences in behavior between users who expressed threat or empathy in their tweets during the pandemic.
- The results only partially support the hypothesis that people tend to reject minorities and foreigners more when faced with the threat of disease.
Plain English Explanation
The COVID-19 pandemic led to major changes in how most of the world's population lived their daily lives, with severe restrictions on social interaction. A psychological theory called the Behavioral Immune System (BIS) suggests that when people face the threat of diseases, they may become more prejudiced and discriminatory towards marginalized groups, including immigrants.
This study aimed to test whether people in Chile became more rejecting of minorities and foreign groups during the pandemic, using data from their Twitter posts. The researchers looked at the differences in behavior between two types of users: those who expressed a sense of threat, and those who showed more empathy.
The results only partially supported the BIS hypothesis. While threatened users did increase their tweet production during the pandemic, the number of empathetic users also grew, and they were able to reach a wider audience with their tweets. The researchers also found differences in the language used by these two groups of users.
There may be other, context-dependent explanations for these findings that the study did not fully explore.
Technical Explanation
The study analyzed Twitter data from Chile to investigate whether people's attitudes towards immigrants and other marginalized groups changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, as predicted by the Behavioral Immune System (BIS) theory.
The researchers classified Twitter users into two groups: those who expressed a sense of threat (e.g., increased prejudice, discrimination) and those who showed more empathy towards others. They compared the tweet production and reach of these two groups before and during the pandemic.
The results showed that threatened users did increase their tweet production during the pandemic, as expected. However, the number of empathetic users also grew, and they were able to reach a wider audience with their tweets. The study also found differences in the language used by these two groups of users.
The researchers suggest that there may be alternative, context-dependent explanations for these findings that were not fully explored in the study. For example, the use of combined Twitter and mobile phone data or the role of non-resident family members as drivers of migration changes may have influenced the results.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into how the COVID-19 pandemic may have affected people's attitudes towards marginalized groups, such as immigrants, in Chile. However, the results only partially support the Behavioral Immune System (BIS) hypothesis, as the researchers note.
One limitation of the study is that it relies solely on Twitter data, which may not be representative of the broader population. The use of large language models for sentiment analysis of newspaper articles could provide a more comprehensive understanding of how attitudes have changed during the pandemic.
Additionally, the study does not fully explore the context-dependent factors that may have influenced the results, such as the role of cultural and geographical differences in shaping people's responses to the pandemic. Further research is needed to better understand the complex interplay between the pandemic, social attitudes, and the wider socio-cultural context.
Conclusion
This study provides a nuanced look at how the COVID-19 pandemic may have affected people's attitudes towards marginalized groups, such as immigrants, in Chile. While the results only partially support the Behavioral Immune System (BIS) hypothesis, they highlight the importance of considering context-dependent factors and using a diverse range of data sources to understand the complex social dynamics at play during the pandemic. The findings suggest that further research is needed to fully explore the relationship between disease threat, social attitudes, and the broader societal context.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
The Persistence of Contrarianism on Twitter: Mapping users' sharing habits for the Ukraine war, COVID-19 vaccination, and the 2020 Midterm Elections
David Axelrod, Sangyeon Kim, John Paolillo
0
0
Empirical studies of online disinformation emphasize matters of public concern such as the COVID-19 pandemic, foreign election interference, and the Russo-Ukraine war, largely in studies that treat the topics separately. Comparatively fewer studies attempt to relate such disparate topics and address the extent to which they share behaviors. In this study, we compare three samples of Twitter data on COVID-19 vaccination, the Ukraine war and the 2022 midterm elections, to ascertain how distinct ideological stances of users across the three samples might be related. Our results indicate the emergence of a broad contrarian stance that is defined by its opposition to public health narratives/policies along with the Biden administration's foreign policy stances. Sharing activity within the contrarian position falls on a spectrum with outright conspiratorial content on one end. We confirm the existence of ideologically coherent cross-subject stances among Twitter users, but in a manner not squarely aligned with right-left political orientations.
7/1/2024
๐ ๏ธ
Word frequency and sentiment analysis of twitter messages during Coronavirus pandemic
Nikhil Kumar Rajput, Bhavya Ahuja Grover, Vipin Kumar Rathi, Riya Bansal
0
0
The COVID-19 epidemic has had a great impact on social media conversation, especially on sites like Twitter, which has emerged as a hub for public reaction and information sharing. This paper deals by analyzing a vast dataset of Twitter messages related to this disease, starting from January 2020. Two approaches were used: a statistical analysis of word frequencies and a sentiment analysis to gauge user attitudes. Word frequencies are modeled using unigrams, bigrams, and trigrams, with power law distribution as the fitting model. The validity of the model is confirmed through metrics like Sum of Squared Errors (SSE), R-squared ($R^2$), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). High $R^2$ and low SSE/RMSE values indicate a good fit for the model. Sentiment analysis is conducted to understand the general emotional tone of Twitter users messages. The results reveal that a majority of tweets exhibit neutral sentiment polarity, with only 2.57% expressing negative polarity.
6/4/2024
Dynamical evolution of social network polarization and its impact on the propagation of a virus
Ixandra Achitouv, David Chavalarias
0
0
The COVID-19 pandemic that emerged in 2020 has highlighted the complex interplay between vaccine hesitancy and societal polarization. In this study, we analyse the dynamical polarization within a social network as well as the network properties before and after a vaccine was made available. Our results show that as the network evolves from a less structured state to one with more clustered communities. Then using an agent-based modeling approach, we simulate the propagation of a virus in a polarized society by assigning vaccines to pro-vaccine individuals and none to the anti-vaccine individuals. We compare this propagation to the case where the same number of vaccines is distributed homogeneously across the population. In polarized networks, we observe a significantly more widespread diffusion of the virus, highlighting the importance of considering polarization for epidemic forecasting.
6/13/2024
How COVID-19 has Impacted the Anti-Vaccine Discourse: A Large-Scale Twitter Study Spanning Pre-COVID and Post-COVID Era
Soham Poddar, Rajdeep Mukherjee, Subhendu Khatuya, Niloy Ganguly, Saptarshi Ghosh
0
0
The debate around vaccines has been going on for decades, but the COVID-19 pandemic showed how crucial it is to understand and mitigate anti-vaccine sentiments. While the pandemic may be over, it is still important to understand how the pandemic affected the anti-vaccine discourse, and whether the arguments against non-COVID vaccines (e.g., Flu, MMR, IPV, HPV vaccines) have also changed due to the pandemic. This study attempts to answer these questions through a large-scale study of anti-vaccine posts on Twitter. Almost all prior works that utilized social media to understand anti-vaccine opinions considered only the three broad stances of Anti-Vax, Pro-Vax, and Neutral. There has not been any effort to identify the specific reasons/concerns behind the anti-vax sentiments (e.g., side-effects, conspiracy theories, political reasons) on social media at scale. In this work, we propose two novel methods for classifying tweets into 11 different anti-vax concerns -- a discriminative approach (entailment-based) and a generative approach (based on instruction tuning of LLMs) -- which outperform several strong baselines. We then apply this classifier on anti-vaccine tweets posted over a 5-year period (Jan 2018 - Jan 2023) to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the anti-vaccine concerns among the masses. We find that the pandemic has made the anti-vaccine discourse far more complex than in the pre-COVID times, and increased the variety of concerns being voiced. Alarmingly, we find that concerns about COVID vaccines are now being projected onto the non-COVID vaccines, thus making more people hesitant in taking vaccines in the post-COVID era.
4/3/2024