Automatic Differentiation is Essential in Training Neural Networks for Solving Differential Equations
2405.14099
0
0
🏋️
Abstract
Neural network-based approaches have recently shown significant promise in solving partial differential equations (PDEs) in science and engineering, especially in scenarios featuring complex domains or the incorporation of empirical data. One advantage of the neural network method for PDEs lies in its automatic differentiation (AD), which necessitates only the sample points themselves, unlike traditional finite difference (FD) approximations that require nearby local points to compute derivatives. In this paper, we quantitatively demonstrate the advantage of AD in training neural networks. The concept of truncated entropy is introduced to characterize the training property. Specifically, through comprehensive experimental and theoretical analyses conducted on random feature models and two-layer neural networks, we discover that the defined truncated entropy serves as a reliable metric for quantifying the residual loss of random feature models and the training speed of neural networks for both AD and FD methods. Our experimental and theoretical analyses demonstrate that, from a training perspective, AD outperforms FD in solving partial differential equations.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Neural networks have shown promise in solving partial differential equations (PDEs) in science and engineering.
- One key advantage of neural networks is their use of automatic differentiation (AD), which only requires the sample points themselves, unlike traditional finite difference (FD) methods that need nearby local points to compute derivatives.
- This paper quantifies the benefits of AD over FD when training neural networks to solve PDEs.
Plain English Explanation
This paper explores the use of neural networks to solve partial differential equations (PDEs), which are mathematical equations used to model complex phenomena in science and engineering. The researchers found that neural networks have a significant advantage over traditional numerical methods, thanks to a technique called automatic differentiation (AD).
Traditionally, solving PDEs requires approximating the derivatives (rates of change) using nearby points, a method known as finite difference (FD). In contrast, neural networks can use AD to calculate derivatives directly from the sample points themselves, without needing nearby data. This makes the neural network approach more efficient and flexible, especially when dealing with complex domains or incorporating empirical data.
The paper introduces a new concept called truncated entropy to quantify the training properties of neural networks. Through experiments and theoretical analysis, the researchers showed that truncated entropy is a reliable metric for measuring the performance of neural networks trained using both AD and FD methods. Their results demonstrate that, from a training perspective, the AD approach outperforms the FD method for solving PDEs.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the use of neural network-based approaches, which leverage automatic differentiation (AD), to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) in science and engineering. AD allows neural networks to compute derivatives directly from the sample points, unlike traditional finite difference (FD) methods that require nearby local points.
Through comprehensive experimental and theoretical analyses, the researchers introduce the concept of truncated entropy to quantify the training properties of neural networks. They apply this metric to study the performance of random feature models and two-layer neural networks trained using both AD and FD methods.
The results show that truncated entropy serves as a reliable measure for evaluating the residual loss of random feature models and the training speed of neural networks. The researchers' analyses demonstrate that, from a training perspective, the AD approach outperforms the FD method in solving PDEs, particularly in scenarios involving complex domains or the incorporation of empirical data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous analysis of the advantages of using neural networks with automatic differentiation (AD) over traditional finite difference (FD) methods for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). The introduction of the truncated entropy metric is a novel and insightful contribution, as it allows for a quantitative comparison of the training properties of these two approaches.
While the paper presents compelling evidence for the superiority of the AD method, it would be useful to see further exploration of the limitations and potential drawbacks of this approach. For example, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity or memory requirements of the neural network models compared to FD methods, which could be an important consideration in practical applications.
Additionally, the paper focuses on theoretical analyses and controlled experiments, but it would be valuable to see how these results translate to real-world PDE problems with complex geometries, boundary conditions, and empirical data sources. Extending this research to more practical, end-to-end mesh optimization scenarios could provide further insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the neural network approach.
Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to the field of numerical methods for PDEs by quantifying the advantages of neural networks with automatic differentiation. Future work could explore the scalability, robustness, and practical applicability of this approach, as well as investigate continuous learning techniques for PDE solutions.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates the potential of neural network-based approaches, leveraging automatic differentiation (AD), to outperform traditional finite difference (FD) methods in solving partial differential equations (PDEs). By introducing the concept of truncated entropy, the researchers were able to quantify the training properties of neural networks and show that the AD approach is superior in terms of residual loss and training speed.
The findings of this paper have important implications for the field of computational science and engineering, as they suggest that neural networks could be a powerful tool for solving complex PDE problems, particularly those involving intricate domains or the incorporation of empirical data. As the research in this area continues to evolve, we can expect to see further advancements in the use of neural networks for PDE modeling and simulation, with potential applications in areas such as fluid dynamics, materials science, and climate modeling.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Solving partial differential equations with sampled neural networks
Chinmay Datar, Taniya Kapoor, Abhishek Chandra, Qing Sun, Iryna Burak, Erik Lien Bolager, Anna Veselovska, Massimo Fornasier, Felix Dietrich
0
0
Approximation of solutions to partial differential equations (PDE) is an important problem in computational science and engineering. Using neural networks as an ansatz for the solution has proven a challenge in terms of training time and approximation accuracy. In this contribution, we discuss how sampling the hidden weights and biases of the ansatz network from data-agnostic and data-dependent probability distributions allows us to progress on both challenges. In most examples, the random sampling schemes outperform iterative, gradient-based optimization of physics-informed neural networks regarding training time and accuracy by several orders of magnitude. For time-dependent PDE, we construct neural basis functions only in the spatial domain and then solve the associated ordinary differential equation with classical methods from scientific computing over a long time horizon. This alleviates one of the greatest challenges for neural PDE solvers because it does not require us to parameterize the solution in time. For second-order elliptic PDE in Barron spaces, we prove the existence of sampled networks with $L^2$ convergence to the solution. We demonstrate our approach on several time-dependent and static PDEs. We also illustrate how sampled networks can effectively solve inverse problems in this setting. Benefits compared to common numerical schemes include spectral convergence and mesh-free construction of basis functions.
6/3/2024
🧠
Algorithmically Designed Artificial Neural Networks (ADANNs): Higher order deep operator learning for parametric partial differential equations
Arnulf Jentzen, Adrian Riekert, Philippe von Wurstemberger
0
0
In this article we propose a new deep learning approach to approximate operators related to parametric partial differential equations (PDEs). In particular, we introduce a new strategy to design specific artificial neural network (ANN) architectures in conjunction with specific ANN initialization schemes which are tailor-made for the particular approximation problem under consideration. In the proposed approach we combine efficient classical numerical approximation techniques with deep operator learning methodologies. Specifically, we introduce customized adaptions of existing ANN architectures together with specialized initializations for these ANN architectures so that at initialization we have that the ANNs closely mimic a chosen efficient classical numerical algorithm for the considered approximation problem. The obtained ANN architectures and their initialization schemes are thus strongly inspired by numerical algorithms as well as by popular deep learning methodologies from the literature and in that sense we refer to the introduced ANNs in conjunction with their tailor-made initialization schemes as Algorithmically Designed Artificial Neural Networks (ADANNs). We numerically test the proposed ADANN methodology in the case of several parametric PDEs. In the tested numerical examples the ADANN methodology significantly outperforms existing traditional approximation algorithms as well as existing deep operator learning methodologies from the literature.
5/30/2024
🤷
Solutions to Elliptic and Parabolic Problems via Finite Difference Based Unsupervised Small Linear Convolutional Neural Networks
Adrian Celaya, Keegan Kirk, David Fuentes, Beatrice Riviere
0
0
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in leveraging deep learning and neural networks to address scientific problems, particularly in solving partial differential equations (PDEs). However, many neural network-based methods like PINNs rely on auto differentiation and sampling collocation points, leading to a lack of interpretability and lower accuracy than traditional numerical methods. As a result, we propose a fully unsupervised approach, requiring no training data, to estimate finite difference solutions for PDEs directly via small linear convolutional neural networks. Our proposed approach uses substantially fewer parameters than similar finite difference-based approaches while also demonstrating comparable accuracy to the true solution for several selected elliptic and parabolic problems compared to the finite difference method.
4/24/2024
📊
Constrained or Unconstrained? Neural-Network-Based Equation Discovery from Data
Grant Norman, Jacqueline Wentz, Hemanth Kolla, Kurt Maute, Alireza Doostan
0
0
Throughout many fields, practitioners often rely on differential equations to model systems. Yet, for many applications, the theoretical derivation of such equations and/or accurate resolution of their solutions may be intractable. Instead, recently developed methods, including those based on parameter estimation, operator subset selection, and neural networks, allow for the data-driven discovery of both ordinary and partial differential equations (PDEs), on a spectrum of interpretability. The success of these strategies is often contingent upon the correct identification of representative equations from noisy observations of state variables and, as importantly and intertwined with that, the mathematical strategies utilized to enforce those equations. Specifically, the latter has been commonly addressed via unconstrained optimization strategies. Representing the PDE as a neural network, we propose to discover the PDE by solving a constrained optimization problem and using an intermediate state representation similar to a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN). The objective function of this constrained optimization problem promotes matching the data, while the constraints require that the PDE is satisfied at several spatial collocation points. We present a penalty method and a widely used trust-region barrier method to solve this constrained optimization problem, and we compare these methods on numerical examples. Our results on the Burgers' and the Korteweg-De Vreis equations demonstrate that the latter constrained method outperforms the penalty method, particularly for higher noise levels or fewer collocation points. For both methods, we solve these discovered neural network PDEs with classical methods, such as finite difference methods, as opposed to PINNs-type methods relying on automatic differentiation. We briefly highlight other small, yet crucial, implementation details.
6/6/2024