Balancing Progress and Responsibility: A Synthesis of Sustainability Trade-Offs of AI-Based Systems
2404.03995
0
0
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities have increased the eagerness of companies to integrate AI into software systems. While AI can be used to have a positive impact on several dimensions of sustainability, this is often overshadowed by its potential negative influence. While many studies have explored sustainability factors in isolation, there is insufficient holistic coverage of potential sustainability benefits or costs that practitioners need to consider during decision-making for AI adoption. We therefore aim to synthesize trade-offs related to sustainability in the context of integrating AI into software systems. We want to make the sustainability benefits and costs of integrating AI more transparent and accessible for practitioners. The study was conducted in collaboration with a Dutch financial organization. We first performed a rapid review that led to the inclusion of 151 research papers. Afterward, we conducted six semi-structured interviews to enrich the data with industry perspectives. The combined results showcase the potential sustainability benefits and costs of integrating AI. The labels synthesized from the review regarding potential sustainability benefits were clustered into 16 themes, with energy management being the most frequently mentioned one. 11 themes were identified in the interviews, with the top mentioned theme being employee wellbeing. Regarding sustainability costs, the review discovered seven themes, with deployment issues being the most popular one, followed by ethics & society. Environmental issues was the top theme from the interviews. Our results provide valuable insights to organizations and practitioners for understanding the potential sustainability implications of adopting AI.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Background and Related Work
The paper examines the sustainability trade-offs of AI-based systems, exploring the balance between technological progress and responsible development. It provides a synthesis of the costs and benefits associated with AI systems, drawing insights from a rapid review of the literature and expert interviews.
Overview
- The paper explores the sustainability trade-offs of AI-based systems, focusing on the balance between technological progress and responsible development.
- It synthesizes the costs and benefits of AI systems through a rapid review of the literature and expert interviews.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at the pros and cons of AI systems and how to find the right balance between using these powerful technologies and making sure they are developed and used responsibly. The researchers did a quick review of previous studies on this topic and also talked to experts to get a well-rounded understanding of the trade-offs involved.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a synthesis of the sustainability trade-offs of AI-based systems, drawing on a rapid review of the literature and semi-structured interviews with domain experts. The rapid review examined academic and gray literature on the costs and benefits of AI systems, while the interviews provided additional insights and perspectives on the complex challenges and considerations involved in balancing AI progress and responsibility.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the sustainability trade-offs associated with AI-based systems, highlighting the need to carefully weigh the potential upsides and downsides. However, the rapid review and interview-based approach may have limitations in terms of the breadth and depth of the insights gathered. More extensive empirical research and a broader range of stakeholder perspectives could further enrich the analysis.
Conclusion
The paper offers a nuanced perspective on the sustainability trade-offs of AI-based systems, underscoring the importance of striking a balance between technological progress and responsible development. The findings emphasize the complex, multi-faceted nature of this challenge and the need for continued research, dialogue, and collaborative efforts to navigate the path forward.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
On the role of ethics and sustainability in business innovation
Maria Fay, Frederik F. Flother
0
0
For organizations to survive and flourish in the long term, innovation and novelty must be continually introduced, which is particularly true in today's rapidly changing world. This raises a variety of ethical and sustainability considerations that seldom receive the attention they deserve. Existing innovation adoption frameworks often focus on technological, organizational, environmental, and social factors impacting adoption. In this chapter, we explore the ethical and sustainability angles, particularly as they relate to emerging technologies, artificial intelligence (AI) being a prominent example. We consider how to facilitate the development and cultivation of innovation cultures in organizations, including budding startups as well as established enterprises, through approaches such as systems thinking.
4/12/2024
🤖
Assessing the Potential of AI for Spatially Sensitive Nature-Related Financial Risks
Steven Reece, Emma O donnell, Felicia Liu, Joanna Wolstenholme, Frida Arriaga, Giacomo Ascenzi, Richard Pywell
0
0
There is growing recognition among financial institutions, financial regulators and policy makers of the importance of addressing nature-related risks and opportunities. Evaluating and assessing nature-related risks for financial institutions is challenging due to the large volume of heterogeneous data available on nature and the complexity of investment value chains and the various components' relationship to nature. The dual problem of scaling data analytics and analysing complex systems can be addressed using Artificial Intelligence (AI). We address issues such as plugging existing data gaps with discovered data, data estimation under uncertainty, time series analysis and (near) real-time updates. This report presents potential AI solutions for models of two distinct use cases, the Brazil Beef Supply Use Case and the Water Utility Use Case. Our two use cases cover a broad perspective within sustainable finance. The Brazilian cattle farming use case is an example of greening finance - integrating nature-related considerations into mainstream financial decision-making to transition investments away from sectors with poor historical track records and unsustainable operations. The deployment of nature-based solutions in the UK water utility use case is an example of financing green - driving investment to nature-positive outcomes. The two use cases also cover different sectors, geographies, financial assets and AI modelling techniques, providing an overview on how AI could be applied to different challenges relating to nature's integration into finance. This report is primarily aimed at financial institutions but is also of interest to ESG data providers, TNFD, systems modellers, and, of course, AI practitioners.
4/29/2024
Towards an Ethical and Inclusive Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: A Multidimensional Framework
Ernesto Giralt Hern'andez
0
0
This article analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on contemporary society and the importance of adopting an ethical approach to its development and implementation within organizations. It examines the technocritical perspective of some philosophers and researchers, who warn of the risks of excessive technologization that could undermine human autonomy. However, the article also acknowledges the active role that various actors, such as governments, academics, and civil society, can play in shaping the development of AI aligned with human and social values. A multidimensional approach is proposed that combines ethics with regulation, innovation, and education. It highlights the importance of developing detailed ethical frameworks, incorporating ethics into the training of professionals, conducting ethical impact audits, and encouraging the participation of stakeholders in the design of AI. In addition, four fundamental pillars are presented for the ethical implementation of AI in organizations: 1) Integrated values, 2) Trust and transparency, 3) Empowering human growth, and 4) Identifying strategic factors. These pillars encompass aspects such as alignment with the company's ethical identity, governance and accountability, human-centered design, continuous training, and adaptability to technological and market changes. The conclusion emphasizes that ethics must be the cornerstone of any organization's strategy that seeks to incorporate AI, establishing a solid framework that ensures that technology is developed and used in a way that respects and promotes human values.
5/6/2024
🎲
Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
Saleh Afroogh, Ali Akbari, Evan Malone, Mohammadali Kargar, Hananeh Alambeigi
0
0
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in our daily life through various applications, services, and products explains the significance of trust/distrust in AI from a user perspective. AI-driven systems (as opposed to other technologies) have ubiquitously diffused in our life not only as some beneficial tools to be used by human agents but also are going to be substitutive agents on our behalf, or manipulative minds that would influence human thought, decision, and agency. Trust/distrust in AI plays the role of a regulator and could significantly control the level of this diffusion, as trust can increase, and distrust may reduce the rate of adoption of AI. Recently, varieties of studies have paid attention to the variant dimension of trust/distrust in AI, and its relevant considerations. In this systematic literature review, after conceptualization of trust in the current AI literature review, we will investigate trust in different types of human-Machine interaction, and its impact on technology acceptance in different domains. In addition to that, we propose a taxonomy of technical (i.e., safety, accuracy, robustness) and non-technical axiological (i.e., ethical, legal, and mixed) trustworthiness metrics, and some trustworthy measurements. Moreover, we examine some major trust-breakers in AI (e.g., autonomy and dignity threat), and trust makers; and propose some future directions and probable solutions for the transition to a trustworthy AI.
4/5/2024