Bayesian neural networks via MCMC: a Python-based tutorial
2304.02595
0
0
🧠
Abstract
Bayesian inference provides a methodology for parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification in machine learning and deep learning methods. Variational inference and Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) sampling methods are used to implement Bayesian inference. In the past three decades, MCMC sampling methods have faced some challenges in being adapted to larger models (such as in deep learning) and big data problems. Advanced proposal distributions that incorporate gradients, such as a Langevin proposal distribution, provide a means to address some of the limitations of MCMC sampling for Bayesian neural networks. Furthermore, MCMC methods have typically been constrained to statisticians and currently not well-known among deep learning researchers. We present a tutorial for MCMC methods that covers simple Bayesian linear and logistic models, and Bayesian neural networks. The aim of this tutorial is to bridge the gap between theory and implementation via coding, given a general sparsity of libraries and tutorials to this end. This tutorial provides code in Python with data and instructions that enable their use and extension. We provide results for some benchmark problems showing the strengths and weaknesses of implementing the respective Bayesian models via MCMC. We highlight the challenges in sampling multi-modal posterior distributions for the case of Bayesian neural networks and the need for further improvement of convergence diagnosis methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper discusses the use of Bayesian inference, a statistical methodology, in machine learning and deep learning.
- It covers two key approaches for implementing Bayesian inference: Variational Inference and Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) sampling.
- The paper highlights challenges in applying MCMC sampling to larger models and big data problems, and introduces advanced proposal distributions that can help address these limitations.
- It presents a tutorial on implementing MCMC for Bayesian linear/logistic models and Bayesian neural networks, with the goal of bridging the gap between theory and practical implementation.
Plain English Explanation
Bayesian inference is a way of making decisions and quantifying uncertainty when working with data and models. In machine learning and deep learning, Bayesian methods can be used to estimate model parameters and understand how confident we can be in the results.
There are a few different approaches for implementing Bayesian inference. Variational inference and Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) sampling are two common techniques. MCMC involves generating a sequence of samples that converge to the desired probability distribution, which can be challenging for large, complex models.
To address the limitations of standard MCMC, the paper discusses using "gradient-based" proposal distributions, which incorporate information about the slopes or gradients of the model. This can make the sampling process more efficient, especially for neural network models.
The tutorial in the paper walks through examples of applying Bayesian methods to simple linear and logistic regression models, as well as more complex Bayesian neural networks. The goal is to provide code and instructions to help bridge the gap between the theoretical Bayesian concepts and actual implementation.
The paper highlights the challenges in obtaining good samples from the posterior distribution, especially for multi-modal distributions that can arise in Bayesian neural networks. It also notes the need for further improvements in convergence diagnosis methods to ensure the sampling is working as intended.
Technical Explanation
The paper covers the use of Bayesian inference for parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification in machine learning. Two key approaches are discussed: Variational Inference and Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) sampling.
MCMC sampling methods have faced difficulties in scaling to larger models, such as those used in deep learning, and big data problems. The paper introduces advanced proposal distributions that incorporate gradient information, like the Langevin proposal, as a way to improve the efficiency of MCMC for Bayesian neural networks.
The tutorial section of the paper demonstrates the implementation of Bayesian linear regression, Bayesian logistic regression, and Bayesian neural networks using MCMC sampling. Python code, data, and instructions are provided to enable readers to experiment with these techniques.
The paper evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the MCMC-based Bayesian models on benchmark problems. It highlights the challenges in sampling from the multi-modal posterior distributions that can arise in Bayesian neural networks, and the need for better convergence diagnosis methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable tutorial for applying Bayesian inference, specifically MCMC sampling, to both simple models and more complex neural networks. The focus on bridging the gap between theory and implementation is commendable, as this can be a significant barrier for many researchers and practitioners.
The introduction of gradient-based proposal distributions, such as the Langevin approach, is a promising direction for improving the efficiency of MCMC sampling for Bayesian neural networks. However, the paper acknowledges that challenges remain in sampling from multi-modal posterior distributions, which can be common in these models.
One area that could be explored further is the comparison of the MCMC-based Bayesian methods to other techniques for uncertainty quantification in deep learning, such as Bayesian Neural Network Latent Variable models or Bayesian optimization approaches. Understanding the relative strengths and weaknesses of these different methods would help provide a more comprehensive perspective.
Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the practical considerations of implementing MCMC-based Bayesian models, such as convergence diagnostics, tuning hyperparameters, and scaling to larger datasets and model architectures. These implementation details can be crucial for successfully applying these techniques in real-world scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper presents a timely and informative tutorial on the use of Bayesian inference, particularly MCMC sampling, for machine learning and deep learning applications. By providing code, data, and step-by-step guidance, the authors have made a valuable contribution towards bridging the gap between the theoretical foundations of Bayesian methods and their practical implementation.
The introduction of advanced proposal distributions, such as the Langevin approach, highlights an important direction for improving the efficiency of MCMC sampling in complex models. However, the paper also underscores the ongoing challenges in handling multi-modal posterior distributions, which remain an area for further research and development.
Overall, the tutorial and insights provided in this paper can be a useful resource for both researchers and practitioners looking to incorporate Bayesian techniques into their machine learning workflows, with the potential to lead to more robust and interpretable models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
A Variational Approach to Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference
Cheng Zhang, Frederick A. Matsen IV
0
0
Bayesian phylogenetic inference is currently done via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) with simple proposal mechanisms. This hinders exploration efficiency and often requires long runs to deliver accurate posterior estimates. In this paper, we present an alternative approach: a variational framework for Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. We propose combining subsplit Bayesian networks, an expressive graphical model for tree topology distributions, and a structured amortization of the branch lengths over tree topologies for a suitable variational family of distributions. We train the variational approximation via stochastic gradient ascent and adopt gradient estimators for continuous and discrete variational parameters separately to deal with the composite latent space of phylogenetic models. We show that our variational approach provides competitive performance to MCMC, while requiring much fewer (though more costly) iterations due to a more efficient exploration mechanism enabled by variational inference. Experiments on a benchmark of challenging real data Bayesian phylogenetic inference problems demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our methods.
5/24/2024
🤯
Few-sample Variational Inference of Bayesian Neural Networks with Arbitrary Nonlinearities
David J. Schodt
0
0
Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) extend traditional neural networks to provide uncertainties associated with their outputs. On the forward pass through a BNN, predictions (and their uncertainties) are made either by Monte Carlo sampling network weights from the learned posterior or by analytically propagating statistical moments through the network. Though flexible, Monte Carlo sampling is computationally expensive and can be infeasible or impractical under resource constraints or for large networks. While moment propagation can ameliorate the computational costs of BNN inference, it can be difficult or impossible for networks with arbitrary nonlinearities, thereby restricting the possible set of network layers permitted with such a scheme. In this work, we demonstrate a simple yet effective approach for propagating statistical moments through arbitrary nonlinearities with only 3 deterministic samples, enabling few-sample variational inference of BNNs without restricting the set of network layers used. Furthermore, we leverage this approach to demonstrate a novel nonlinear activation function that we use to inject physics-informed prior information into output nodes of a BNN.
5/22/2024
Scalable Bayesian Learning with posteriors
Samuel Duffield, Kaelan Donatella, Johnathan Chiu, Phoebe Klett, Daniel Simpson
0
0
Although theoretically compelling, Bayesian learning with modern machine learning models is computationally challenging since it requires approximating a high dimensional posterior distribution. In this work, we (i) introduce posteriors, an easily extensible PyTorch library hosting general-purpose implementations making Bayesian learning accessible and scalable to large data and parameter regimes; (ii) present a tempered framing of stochastic gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo, as implemented in posteriors, that transitions seamlessly into optimization and unveils a minor modification to deep ensembles to ensure they are asymptotically unbiased for the Bayesian posterior, and (iii) demonstrate and compare the utility of Bayesian approximations through experiments including an investigation into the cold posterior effect and applications with large language models.
6/4/2024
🧠
A Study of Bayesian Neural Network Surrogates for Bayesian Optimization
Yucen Lily Li, Tim G. J. Rudner, Andrew Gordon Wilson
0
0
Bayesian optimization is a highly efficient approach to optimizing objective functions which are expensive to query. These objectives are typically represented by Gaussian process (GP) surrogate models which are easy to optimize and support exact inference. While standard GP surrogates have been well-established in Bayesian optimization, Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) have recently become practical function approximators, with many benefits over standard GPs such as the ability to naturally handle non-stationarity and learn representations for high-dimensional data. In this paper, we study BNNs as alternatives to standard GP surrogates for optimization. We consider a variety of approximate inference procedures for finite-width BNNs, including high-quality Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, low-cost stochastic MCMC, and heuristics such as deep ensembles. We also consider infinite-width BNNs, linearized Laplace approximations, and partially stochastic models such as deep kernel learning. We evaluate this collection of surrogate models on diverse problems with varying dimensionality, number of objectives, non-stationarity, and discrete and continuous inputs. We find: (i) the ranking of methods is highly problem dependent, suggesting the need for tailored inductive biases; (ii) HMC is the most successful approximate inference procedure for fully stochastic BNNs; (iii) full stochasticity may be unnecessary as deep kernel learning is relatively competitive; (iv) deep ensembles perform relatively poorly; (v) infinite-width BNNs are particularly promising, especially in high dimensions.
5/9/2024