Beyond the Norms: Detecting Prediction Errors in Regression Models

2406.06968

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/12/2024 by Andres Altieri, Marco Romanelli, Georg Pichler, Florence Alberge, Pablo Piantanida
Beyond the Norms: Detecting Prediction Errors in Regression Models

Abstract

This paper tackles the challenge of detecting unreliable behavior in regression algorithms, which may arise from intrinsic variability (e.g., aleatoric uncertainty) or modeling errors (e.g., model uncertainty). First, we formally introduce the notion of unreliability in regression, i.e., when the output of the regressor exceeds a specified discrepancy (or error). Then, using powerful tools for probabilistic modeling, we estimate the discrepancy density, and we measure its statistical diversity using our proposed metric for statistical dissimilarity. In turn, this allows us to derive a data-driven score that expresses the uncertainty of the regression outcome. We show empirical improvements in error detection for multiple regression tasks, consistently outperforming popular baseline approaches, and contributing to the broader field of uncertainty quantification and safe machine learning systems. Our code is available at https://zenodo.org/records/11281964.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel method for detecting prediction errors in regression models that go beyond the typical assumptions of normality.
  • The authors propose a robust approach that can identify atypical data points and handle complex, non-linear relationships in the data.
  • The method is evaluated on both synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving model performance and providing insights into the data.

Plain English Explanation

Regression models are a common tool used to make predictions based on input data. However, these models often rely on the assumption that the data follows a normal (or Gaussian) distribution. This means that the errors, or differences between the predicted and actual values, are expected to be normally distributed as well.

In reality, many real-world datasets do not fit this assumption. There may be outliers or complex, non-linear relationships that the standard regression models struggle to capture. This can lead to inaccurate predictions and a failure to identify important patterns in the data.

The authors of this paper have developed a new method to address this problem. Their approach, which they call "Beyond the Norms," can detect prediction errors that fall outside of the typical normal distribution. By identifying these atypical data points, the researchers can gain a better understanding of the underlying relationships in the data and improve the performance of the regression model.

The method is tested on both artificial and real-world datasets, and the results show that it outperforms conventional regression techniques in terms of identifying prediction errors and uncovering hidden insights. This could be particularly useful in fields like [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/predictability-analysis-regression-problems-via-conditional-entropy]predictability analysis[/link], [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/analytical-results-uncertainty-propagation-through-trained-machine]uncertainty quantification[/link], and [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-design-evaluation-predictive-algorithms-under-unobserved]robust algorithm design[/link], where accurately modeling complex data is crucial.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new method for detecting prediction errors in regression models that go beyond the typical assumption of normally distributed errors. The authors propose a "Beyond the Norms" approach that leverages conditional entropy to identify atypical data points that do not fit the expected error distribution.

The key idea is to compute the conditional entropy of the prediction errors, which measures the uncertainty or unpredictability of the errors given the input features. By analyzing the conditional entropy, the method can detect data points with unexpectedly high or low prediction errors, indicating potential issues with the model or the data.

The authors evaluate their approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets, including examples from [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/uncertainty-quantification-metrics-deep-regression]deep regression[/link] and [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/model-free-prediction-uncertainty-assessment]uncertainty assessment[/link]. The results show that the "Beyond the Norms" method outperforms standard regression techniques in identifying prediction errors and uncovering hidden patterns in the data.

Critical Analysis

The authors have presented a promising approach for detecting prediction errors in regression models that go beyond the typical assumptions of normality. By leveraging conditional entropy, the method can identify atypical data points and provide insights into the underlying relationships in the data.

One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on the accuracy of the underlying regression model. If the initial model is poorly specified or has other inherent biases, the "Beyond the Norms" approach may not be able to fully correct for these issues. Additionally, the method may be computationally intensive for large-scale datasets, which could limit its practical applicability in some real-world scenarios.

Further research could explore ways to integrate the error detection mechanism more seamlessly into the model training process, potentially allowing for iterative refinement of the regression model based on the identified prediction errors. Investigating the method's performance on a wider range of datasets and use cases would also help to validate its robustness and generalizability.

Conclusion

The "Beyond the Norms" approach presented in this paper offers a promising solution for improving the accuracy and interpretability of regression models by going beyond the assumption of normally distributed errors. By identifying atypical data points and uncovering hidden patterns in the data, the method can help researchers and practitioners gain a deeper understanding of the underlying relationships and make more informed decisions.

The potential applications of this work span a wide range of fields, from [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/predictability-analysis-regression-problems-via-conditional-entropy]predictability analysis[/link] to [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-design-evaluation-predictive-algorithms-under-unobserved]robust algorithm design[/link], where accurately modeling complex data is crucial. As the field of machine learning continues to advance, techniques like the "Beyond the Norms" approach will likely play an increasingly important role in unlocking the full potential of regression models and driving progress in a variety of domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Predictability Analysis of Regression Problems via Conditional Entropy Estimations

Predictability Analysis of Regression Problems via Conditional Entropy Estimations

Yu-Hsueh Fang, Chia-Yen Lee

YC

0

Reddit

0

In the field of machine learning, regression problems are pivotal due to their ability to predict continuous outcomes. Traditional error metrics like mean squared error, mean absolute error, and coefficient of determination measure model accuracy. The model accuracy is the consequence of the selected model and the features, which blurs the analysis of contribution. Predictability, in the other hand, focus on the predictable level of a target variable given a set of features. This study introduces conditional entropy estimators to assess predictability in regression problems, bridging this gap. We enhance and develop reliable conditional entropy estimators, particularly the KNIFE-P estimator and LMC-P estimator, which offer under- and over-estimation, providing a practical framework for predictability analysis. Extensive experiments on synthesized and real-world datasets demonstrate the robustness and utility of these estimators. Additionally, we extend the analysis to the coefficient of determination (R^2 ), enhancing the interpretability of predictability. The results highlight the effectiveness of KNIFE-P and LMC-P in capturing the achievable performance and limitations of feature sets, providing valuable tools in the development of regression models. These indicators offer a robust framework for assessing the predictability for regression problems.

Read more

6/7/2024

Analytical results for uncertainty propagation through trained machine learning regression models

Analytical results for uncertainty propagation through trained machine learning regression models

Andrew Thompson

YC

0

Reddit

0

Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being used in metrology applications. However, for ML models to be credible in a metrology context they should be accompanied by principled uncertainty quantification. This paper addresses the challenge of uncertainty propagation through trained/fixed machine learning (ML) regression models. Analytical expressions for the mean and variance of the model output are obtained/presented for certain input data distributions and for a variety of ML models. Our results cover several popular ML models including linear regression, penalised linear regression, kernel ridge regression, Gaussian Processes (GPs), support vector machines (SVMs) and relevance vector machines (RVMs). We present numerical experiments in which we validate our methods and compare them with a Monte Carlo approach from a computational efficiency point of view. We also illustrate our methods in the context of a metrology application, namely modelling the state-of-health of lithium-ion cells based upon Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) data

Read more

5/9/2024

🤿

Uncertainty Quantification Metrics for Deep Regression

Simon Kristoffersson Lind, Ziliang Xiong, Per-Erik Forss'en, Volker Kruger

YC

0

Reddit

0

When deploying deep neural networks on robots or other physical systems, the learned model should reliably quantify predictive uncertainty. A reliable uncertainty allows downstream modules to reason about the safety of its actions. In this work, we address metrics for evaluating such an uncertainty. Specifically, we focus on regression tasks, and investigate Area Under Sparsification Error (AUSE), Calibration Error, Spearman's Rank Correlation, and Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL). Using synthetic regression datasets, we look into how those metrics behave under four typical types of uncertainty, their stability regarding the size of the test set, and reveal their strengths and weaknesses. Our results indicate that Calibration Error is the most stable and interpretable metric, but AUSE and NLL also have their respective use cases. We discourage the usage of Spearman's Rank Correlation for evaluating uncertainties and recommend replacing it with AUSE.

Read more

5/24/2024

🛸

Robust Design and Evaluation of Predictive Algorithms under Unobserved Confounding

Ashesh Rambachan, Amanda Coston, Edward Kennedy

YC

0

Reddit

0

Predictive algorithms inform consequential decisions in settings where the outcome is selectively observed given choices made by human decision makers. We propose a unified framework for the robust design and evaluation of predictive algorithms in selectively observed data. We impose general assumptions on how much the outcome may vary on average between unselected and selected units conditional on observed covariates and identified nuisance parameters, formalizing popular empirical strategies for imputing missing data such as proxy outcomes and instrumental variables. We develop debiased machine learning estimators for the bounds on a large class of predictive performance estimands, such as the conditional likelihood of the outcome, a predictive algorithm's mean square error, true/false positive rate, and many others, under these assumptions. In an administrative dataset from a large Australian financial institution, we illustrate how varying assumptions on unobserved confounding leads to meaningful changes in default risk predictions and evaluations of credit scores across sensitive groups.

Read more

5/21/2024