A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models
2402.13457
0
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMS) have increasingly become central to generating content with potential societal impacts. Notably, these models have demonstrated capabilities for generating content that could be deemed harmful. To mitigate these risks, researchers have adopted safety training techniques to align model outputs with societal values to curb the generation of malicious content. However, the phenomenon of jailbreaking, where carefully crafted prompts elicit harmful responses from models, persists as a significant challenge. This research conducts a comprehensive analysis of existing studies on jailbreaking LLMs and their defense techniques. We meticulously investigate nine attack techniques and seven defense techniques applied across three distinct language models: Vicuna, LLama, and GPT-3.5 Turbo. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of these attack and defense techniques. Our findings reveal that existing white-box attacks underperform compared to universal techniques and that including special tokens in the input significantly affects the likelihood of successful attacks. This research highlights the need to concentrate on the security facets of LLMs. Additionally, we contribute to the field by releasing our datasets and testing framework, aiming to foster further research into LLM security. We believe these contributions will facilitate the exploration of security measures within this domain.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a comprehensive study on techniques for attacking and defending against large language model (LLM) jailbreak - the ability to bypass the intended safety constraints of an LLM and make it generate harmful or undesirable content.
- It explores the latest jailbreak attack methods, as well as various defense strategies to mitigate these attacks.
- The research aims to advance the understanding of LLM security and safety, which is crucial as these models become more prevalent in real-world applications.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, these models are often designed with safety constraints to prevent them from producing harmful or undesirable content. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/jailbreakv-28k-benchmark-assessing-robustness-multimodal-large">Jailbreak attacks</a> aim to bypass these constraints, allowing the LLM to generate dangerous or malicious text.
This paper explores the latest techniques for attacking and defending against LLM jailbreak. The researchers investigate different methods that can be used to circumvent the safety measures put in place by LLM developers, such as <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/subtoxic-questions-dive-into-attitude-change-llms">prompting the model with subtle, subversive questions</a> or using <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/rethinking-how-to-evaluate-language-model-jailbreak">novel evaluation techniques</a> to find weaknesses in the model's defenses.
At the same time, the paper also examines various defense strategies that can be employed to protect LLMs from these jailbreak attacks. This includes developing more robust safety mechanisms, <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/jailbreaklens-visual-analysis-jailbreak-attacks-against-large">using visual analysis tools to detect and mitigate attacks</a>, and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/do-anything-now-characterizing-evaluating-wild-jailbreak">continuously evaluating and improving the model's security</a>.
Overall, this research is crucial for ensuring the safe and responsible development of powerful AI systems like LLMs, which are becoming increasingly important in a wide range of applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on LLM jailbreak, explaining the concept of bypassing the intended safety constraints of these models to generate harmful or undesirable content. It then reviews the related work in this area, including recent studies on jailbreak attack techniques and defense strategies.
The core of the paper focuses on the researchers' own comprehensive investigation into LLM jailbreak. They examine a wide range of attack methods, such as using carefully crafted prompts to bypass the model's safety checks, as well as novel evaluation techniques that can uncover weaknesses in the model's defenses.
To assess the effectiveness of these attack methods, the researchers develop a <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/jailbreakv-28k-benchmark-assessing-robustness-multimodal-large">comprehensive benchmark</a> for evaluating the robustness of LLMs to jailbreak attacks. This benchmark includes a diverse set of test cases and metrics to measure the model's performance under different attack scenarios.
In parallel, the paper explores various defense strategies to mitigate the threat of LLM jailbreak. These include developing more robust safety mechanisms, <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/jailbreaklens-visual-analysis-jailbreak-attacks-against-large">using visual analysis tools to detect and analyze attacks</a>, and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/do-anything-now-characterizing-evaluating-wild-jailbreak">continuously evaluating and improving the model's security</a>.
The researchers present the results of their experiments and analyses, providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of both the attack and defense techniques. They discuss the implications of their findings for the development and deployment of secure and responsible LLMs.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study on LLM jailbreak, covering a wide range of attack and defense techniques. The researchers have clearly put a significant effort into developing a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the robustness of LLMs, which is a valuable contribution to the field.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations in its approach. For example, the researchers note that their evaluation focuses primarily on text-based jailbreak attacks, and there may be additional challenges when considering multimodal inputs or other attack vectors. Additionally, the paper suggests that further research is needed to understand the long-term sustainability of the proposed defense strategies and their effectiveness against evolving attack methods.
One potential area for further investigation is the ethical and societal implications of LLM jailbreak. While the paper is primarily focused on the technical aspects of the problem, it would be valuable to explore the wider implications of these attacks, such as the potential for misuse or the impact on public trust in AI systems.
Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to the understanding of LLM security and safety, and its findings will be of great interest to researchers and practitioners working in this field.
Conclusion
This comprehensive study on LLM jailbreak attack and defense techniques provides valuable insights into the current state of the art in this critical area of AI security. By exploring a wide range of attack methods and defense strategies, the researchers have significantly advanced our understanding of the challenges and potential solutions for ensuring the safe and responsible development of powerful language models.
The findings of this paper will be of great importance as LLMs become more prevalent in real-world applications, where the ability to bypass safety constraints could have serious consequences. The researchers' development of a robust benchmark for evaluating LLM robustness is a particularly valuable contribution, as it will enable further research and development in this area.
Overall, this study underscores the critical need for ongoing research and innovation in the field of AI security, as the race between attackers and defenders continues to evolve. By addressing these challenges head-on, the research community can help ensure that the transformative potential of LLMs is realized in a way that prioritizes safety, security, and ethical considerations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Subtoxic Questions: Dive Into Attitude Change of LLM's Response in Jailbreak Attempts
Tianyu Zhang, Zixuan Zhao, Jiaqi Huang, Jingyu Hua, Sheng Zhong
0
0
As Large Language Models (LLMs) of Prompt Jailbreaking are getting more and more attention, it is of great significance to raise a generalized research paradigm to evaluate attack strengths and a basic model to conduct subtler experiments. In this paper, we propose a novel approach by focusing on a set of target questions that are inherently more sensitive to jailbreak prompts, aiming to circumvent the limitations posed by enhanced LLM security. Through designing and analyzing these sensitive questions, this paper reveals a more effective method of identifying vulnerabilities in LLMs, thereby contributing to the advancement of LLM security. This research not only challenges existing jailbreaking methodologies but also fortifies LLMs against potential exploits.
4/15/2024
🌀
Bag of Tricks: Benchmarking of Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs
Zhao Xu, Fan Liu, Hao Liu
0
0
Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities in executing complex tasks in a zero-shot manner, they are susceptible to jailbreak attacks and can be manipulated to produce harmful outputs. Recently, a growing body of research has categorized jailbreak attacks into token-level and prompt-level attacks. However, previous work primarily overlooks the diverse key factors of jailbreak attacks, with most studies concentrating on LLM vulnerabilities and lacking exploration of defense-enhanced LLMs. To address these issues, we evaluate the impact of various attack settings on LLM performance and provide a baseline benchmark for jailbreak attacks, encouraging the adoption of a standardized evaluation framework. Specifically, we evaluate the eight key factors of implementing jailbreak attacks on LLMs from both target-level and attack-level perspectives. We further conduct seven representative jailbreak attacks on six defense methods across two widely used datasets, encompassing approximately 320 experiments with about 50,000 GPU hours on A800-80G. Our experimental results highlight the need for standardized benchmarking to evaluate these attacks on defense-enhanced LLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/usail-hkust/Bag_of_Tricks_for_LLM_Jailbreaking.
6/14/2024
💬
Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks Through Goal Prioritization
Zhexin Zhang, Junxiao Yang, Pei Ke, Fei Mi, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
0
0
While significant attention has been dedicated to exploiting weaknesses in LLMs through jailbreaking attacks, there remains a paucity of effort in defending against these attacks. We point out a pivotal factor contributing to the success of jailbreaks: the intrinsic conflict between the goals of being helpful and ensuring safety. Accordingly, we propose to integrate goal prioritization at both training and inference stages to counteract. Implementing goal prioritization during inference substantially diminishes the Attack Success Rate (ASR) of jailbreaking from 66.4% to 3.6% for ChatGPT. And integrating goal prioritization into model training reduces the ASR from 71.0% to 6.6% for Llama2-13B. Remarkably, even in scenarios where no jailbreaking samples are included during training, our approach slashes the ASR by half. Additionally, our findings reveal that while stronger LLMs face greater safety risks, they also possess a greater capacity to be steered towards defending against such attacks, both because of their stronger ability in instruction following. Our work thus contributes to the comprehension of jailbreaking attacks and defenses, and sheds light on the relationship between LLMs' capability and safety. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/thu-coai/JailbreakDefense_GoalPriority}.
6/13/2024
💬
Take a Look at it! Rethinking How to Evaluate Language Model Jailbreak
Hongyu Cai, Arjun Arunasalam, Leo Y. Lin, Antonio Bianchi, Z. Berkay Celik
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly integrated with various applications. To ensure that LLMs do not generate unsafe responses, they are aligned with safeguards that specify what content is restricted. However, such alignment can be bypassed to produce prohibited content using a technique commonly referred to as jailbreak. Different systems have been proposed to perform the jailbreak automatically. These systems rely on evaluation methods to determine whether a jailbreak attempt is successful. However, our analysis reveals that current jailbreak evaluation methods have two limitations. (1) Their objectives lack clarity and do not align with the goal of identifying unsafe responses. (2) They oversimplify the jailbreak result as a binary outcome, successful or not. In this paper, we propose three metrics, safeguard violation, informativeness, and relative truthfulness, to evaluate language model jailbreak. Additionally, we demonstrate how these metrics correlate with the goal of different malicious actors. To compute these metrics, we introduce a multifaceted approach that extends the natural language generation evaluation method after preprocessing the response. We evaluate our metrics on a benchmark dataset produced from three malicious intent datasets and three jailbreak systems. The benchmark dataset is labeled by three annotators. We compare our multifaceted approach with three existing jailbreak evaluation methods. Experiments demonstrate that our multifaceted evaluation outperforms existing methods, with F1 scores improving on average by 17% compared to existing baselines. Our findings motivate the need to move away from the binary view of the jailbreak problem and incorporate a more comprehensive evaluation to ensure the safety of the language model.
5/8/2024