Counting Like Transformers: Compiling Temporal Counting Logic Into Softmax Transformers

2404.04393

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/9/2024 by Andy Yang, David Chiang

Abstract

Deriving formal bounds on the expressivity of transformers, as well as studying transformers that are constructed to implement known algorithms, are both effective methods for better understanding the computational power of transformers. Towards both ends, we introduce the temporal counting logic $textbf{K}_text{t}$[#] alongside the RASP variant $textbf{C-RASP}$. We show they are equivalent to each other, and that together they are the best-known lower bound on the formal expressivity of future-masked soft attention transformers with unbounded input size. We prove this by showing all $textbf{K}_text{t}$[#] formulas can be compiled into these transformers. As a case study, we demonstrate on paper how to use $textbf{C-RASP}$ to construct simple transformer language models that, using greedy decoding, can only generate sentences that have given properties formally specified in $textbf{K}_text{t}$[#].

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel approach to compiling temporal counting logic into Softmax Transformers, a type of neural network architecture.
  • The authors propose a method to endow Transformers with the ability to perform temporal counting, which is a fundamental building block of logical reasoning.
  • The approach involves translating temporal counting logic into a format that can be efficiently implemented using the attention mechanism in Transformers.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on a range of counting-based tasks, showing that Transformers can learn to perform complex temporal counting without explicit programming.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a way to make Transformer models, a type of neural network, better at counting and tracking events over time. Transformers are powerful models that have revolutionized fields like natural language processing, but they can struggle with tasks that require careful counting or keeping track of sequences of events.

The authors of this paper have found a clever solution to this problem. They developed a method to "compile" logical rules for counting and temporal reasoning into the Transformer architecture. This allows the Transformer to learn to perform these counting and reasoning tasks directly, without needing to be explicitly programmed with the rules.

To do this, the researchers took the mathematical rules and concepts used for temporal counting logic, and translated them into a format that the Transformer's attention mechanism could understand and apply. This essentially teaches the Transformer how to count and reason about sequences of events.

The researchers then tested this approach on various counting-based tasks, and found that the Transformer models were able to learn to perform complex temporal counting very effectively. This is an important breakthrough, as the ability to reason about sequences of events over time is a crucial skill for many real-world applications of AI, from understanding natural language to planning and decision-making.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel approach to imbuing Softmax Transformers with the ability to perform temporal counting, a fundamental building block of logical reasoning. The authors propose a method to compile temporal counting logic into the Transformer architecture, allowing the model to learn to perform complex counting tasks without explicit programming.

The key insight is to translate temporal counting logic into a format that can be efficiently implemented using the attention mechanism in Transformers. The authors draw on prior work on RASP and Tracr, which provided a symbolic framework for modeling temporal reasoning.

By compiling this counting logic into the Transformer's attention weights and output layers, the authors are able to endow the model with the ability to track and reason about sequences of events over time. This addresses a key limitation of standard Transformer architectures, which can struggle with tasks that require precise temporal reasoning.

The authors evaluate their approach on a range of counting-based tasks and demonstrate that Transformers can learn to perform complex temporal counting without explicit programming. This is a significant advance, as the ability to reason about sequences is crucial for many real-world applications of AI.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing the temporal reasoning capabilities of Transformer models. The authors' method of "compiling" counting logic into the Transformer architecture is a clever and elegant solution to a longstanding limitation of these models.

One potential caveat is that the approach may be limited to relatively simple counting tasks, and it's unclear how well it would scale to more complex temporal reasoning problems. The authors acknowledge this, and suggest that further research is needed to explore the limits of the method.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a deep analysis of the inner workings of the compiled Transformer models. It would be interesting to see a more detailed examination of how the attention mechanism and output layers are modified to implement the counting logic.

Despite these minor limitations, the paper represents an important advance in the field of neural-symbolic integration, demonstrating how symbolic knowledge can be effectively integrated into powerful neural architectures like Transformers. This work has the potential to significantly improve the reasoning and problem-solving capabilities of AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach to enhancing the temporal reasoning abilities of Transformer models by compiling temporal counting logic into their architecture. The authors' method allows Transformers to learn to perform complex counting tasks without explicit programming, addressing a key limitation of these models.

The results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, and suggest that it could have significant implications for a wide range of AI applications that require the ability to reason about sequences of events over time. By bridging the gap between symbolic and neural approaches, this work represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to develop more capable and versatile AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🎲

Transformers as Transducers

Lena Strobl, Dana Angluin, David Chiang, Jonathan Rawski, Ashish Sabharwal

YC

0

Reddit

0

We study the sequence-to-sequence mapping capacity of transformers by relating them to finite transducers, and find that they can express surprisingly large classes of transductions. We do so using variants of RASP, a programming language designed to help people think like transformers, as an intermediate representation. We extend the existing Boolean variant B-RASP to sequence-to-sequence functions and show that it computes exactly the first-order rational functions (such as string rotation). Then, we introduce two new extensions. B-RASP[pos] enables calculations on positions (such as copying the first half of a string) and contains all first-order regular functions. S-RASP adds prefix sum, which enables additional arithmetic operations (such as squaring a string) and contains all first-order polyregular functions. Finally, we show that masked average-hard attention transformers can simulate S-RASP. A corollary of our results is a new proof that transformer decoders are Turing-complete.

Read more

4/3/2024

🤿

Softmax Attention with Constant Cost per Token

Franz A. Heinsen

YC

0

Reddit

0

We propose a simple modification to the conventional attention mechanism applied by Transformers: Instead of quantifying pairwise query-key similarity with scaled dot-products, we quantify it with the logarithms of scaled dot-products of exponentials. Our modification linearizes attention with exponential kernel feature maps, whose corresponding feature function is infinite dimensional. We show that our modification is expressible as a composition of log-sums of exponentials, with a latent space of constant size, enabling application with constant time and space complexity per token. We implement our modification, verify that it works in practice, and conclude that it is a promising alternative to conventional attention.

Read more

4/30/2024

📉

The Expressive Power of Transformers with Chain of Thought

William Merrill, Ashish Sabharwal

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent theoretical work has identified surprisingly simple reasoning problems, such as checking if two nodes in a graph are connected or simulating finite-state machines, that are provably unsolvable by standard transformers that answer immediately after reading their input. However, in practice, transformers' reasoning can be improved by allowing them to use a chain of thought or scratchpad, i.e., generate and condition on a sequence of intermediate tokens before answering. Motivated by this, we ask: Does such intermediate generation fundamentally extend the computational power of a decoder-only transformer? We show that the answer is yes, but the amount of increase depends crucially on the amount of intermediate generation. For instance, we find that transformer decoders with a logarithmic number of decoding steps (w.r.t. the input length) push the limits of standard transformers only slightly, while a linear number of decoding steps, assuming projected pre-norm (a slight generalization of standard pre-norm), adds a clear new ability (under standard complexity conjectures): recognizing all regular languages. Our results also imply that linear steps keep transformer decoders within context-sensitive languages, and polynomial steps with generalized pre-norm make them recognize exactly the class of polynomial-time solvable problems -- the first exact characterization of a type of transformers in terms of standard complexity classes. Together, this provides a nuanced framework for understanding how the length of a transformer's chain of thought or scratchpad impacts its reasoning power.

Read more

4/15/2024

Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problems

Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problems

Zhiyuan Li, Hong Liu, Denny Zhou, Tengyu Ma

YC

0

Reddit

0

Instructing the model to generate a sequence of intermediate steps, a.k.a., a chain of thought (CoT), is a highly effective method to improve the accuracy of large language models (LLMs) on arithmetics and symbolic reasoning tasks. However, the mechanism behind CoT remains unclear. This work provides a theoretical understanding of the power of CoT for decoder-only transformers through the lens of expressiveness. Conceptually, CoT empowers the model with the ability to perform inherently serial computation, which is otherwise lacking in transformers, especially when depth is low. Given input length $n$, previous works have shown that constant-depth transformers with finite precision $mathsf{poly}(n)$ embedding size can only solve problems in $mathsf{TC}^0$ without CoT. We first show an even tighter expressiveness upper bound for constant-depth transformers with constant-bit precision, which can only solve problems in $mathsf{AC}^0$, a proper subset of $ mathsf{TC}^0$. However, with $T$ steps of CoT, constant-depth transformers using constant-bit precision and $O(log n)$ embedding size can solve any problem solvable by boolean circuits of size $T$. Empirically, enabling CoT dramatically improves the accuracy for tasks that are hard for parallel computation, including the composition of permutation groups, iterated squaring, and circuit value problems, especially for low-depth transformers.

Read more

5/8/2024