Dataset-learning duality and emergent criticality
2405.17391
0
0
Abstract
In artificial neural networks, the activation dynamics of non-trainable variables is strongly coupled to the learning dynamics of trainable variables. During the activation pass, the boundary neurons (e.g., input neurons) are mapped to the bulk neurons (e.g., hidden neurons), and during the learning pass, both bulk and boundary neurons are mapped to changes in trainable variables (e.g., weights and biases). For example, in feed-forward neural networks, forward propagation is the activation pass and backward propagation is the learning pass. We show that a composition of the two maps establishes a duality map between a subspace of non-trainable boundary variables (e.g., dataset) and a tangent subspace of trainable variables (i.e., learning). In general, the dataset-learning duality is a complex non-linear map between high-dimensional spaces, but in a learning equilibrium, the problem can be linearized and reduced to many weakly coupled one-dimensional problems. We use the duality to study the emergence of criticality, or the power-law distributions of fluctuations of the trainable variables. In particular, we show that criticality can emerge in the learning system even from the dataset in a non-critical state, and that the power-law distribution can be modified by changing either the activation function or the loss function.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the "dataset-learning duality" in neural networks, where the training dataset and the learning process are intrinsically linked.
- The researchers investigate how the properties of the training data can lead to the emergence of critical phenomena, similar to phase transitions in physics, during the training process.
- The findings have implications for understanding the generalization capabilities and dynamics of neural networks, as well as their connections to complex systems and statistical physics.
Plain English Explanation
Neural networks, the core building blocks of modern artificial intelligence, are complex systems that learn from data. The researchers in this paper explore how the training dataset and the learning process within neural networks are deeply intertwined, a concept they call "dataset-learning duality."
Just like how the properties of a material, such as its crystalline structure, can lead to phase transitions (like the change from solid to liquid) when heated, the researchers find that the properties of the training data can cause critical phenomena to emerge during the training of neural networks. These critical points, similar to phase transitions, can profoundly impact the network's ability to generalize and learn from the data.
By drawing parallels between neural networks and complex systems in physics, the researchers gain insights into the fundamental dynamics underlying machine learning. This work helps us better understand the capabilities and limitations of neural networks, as well as how they might be improved or applied to solve real-world problems.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the "dataset-learning duality" in neural networks, where the properties of the training dataset and the learning process are intrinsically linked. The researchers explore how the characteristics of the training data can lead to the emergence of critical phenomena, similar to phase transitions observed in physical systems, during the training of neural networks.
The team uses theoretical and numerical analyses to study the relationship between the dataset and the learning dynamics. They find that the distributions and correlations within the training data can give rise to critical points, where small changes in the dataset or the learning parameters can drastically alter the network's behavior and generalization performance.
These critical phenomena are analogous to the phase transitions seen in statistical physics, where a system exhibits qualitative changes in its properties at certain "critical" points. The researchers draw connections between the learning dynamics of neural networks and the dynamics of complex systems, suggesting that tools and concepts from statistical physics may be applicable to understanding the fundamental behavior of machine learning algorithms.
The insights from this work have implications for improving the design and training of neural networks, as well as for understanding their capabilities and limitations in real-world applications. By exploring the dataset-learning duality, the researchers aim to uncover the underlying principles that govern the emergent behavior of these powerful artificial intelligence models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and rigorous analysis of the interplay between the training dataset and the learning process in neural networks. The researchers' use of concepts from statistical physics to study the critical phenomena that can arise during training is a novel and promising approach.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and caveats to their work. For example, the analysis is primarily focused on simple, feedforward neural network architectures, and it remains to be seen how well the findings generalize to more complex, modern neural network designs. Additionally, the theoretical and numerical analyses in the paper rely on certain simplifying assumptions, which may not fully capture the nuances of real-world training scenarios.
Further research is needed to explore the dataset-learning duality in a broader range of neural network architectures and learning tasks. It would also be valuable to investigate how these critical phenomena manifest in practical applications, and whether they can be leveraged or mitigated to improve the performance and robustness of AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a compelling exploration of the "dataset-learning duality" in neural networks, where the properties of the training data and the learning process are intrinsically linked. By drawing parallels between the critical phenomena observed in neural network training and the phase transitions studied in statistical physics, the researchers offer new insights into the fundamental dynamics of these powerful AI models.
The findings have significant implications for understanding the generalization capabilities of neural networks, as well as their connections to complex systems and the broader field of machine learning. While further research is needed to fully unravel the nuances of the dataset-learning duality, this work represents an important step towards a more comprehensive theory of neural network behavior and performance.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Two Tales of Single-Phase Contrastive Hebbian Learning
Rasmus Kj{ae}r H{o}ier, Christopher Zach
0
0
The search for ``biologically plausible'' learning algorithms has converged on the idea of representing gradients as activity differences. However, most approaches require a high degree of synchronization (distinct phases during learning) and introduce substantial computational overhead, which raises doubts regarding their biological plausibility as well as their potential utility for neuromorphic computing. Furthermore, they commonly rely on applying infinitesimal perturbations (nudges) to output units, which is impractical in noisy environments. Recently it has been shown that by modelling artificial neurons as dyads with two oppositely nudged compartments, it is possible for a fully local learning algorithm named ``dual propagation'' to bridge the performance gap to backpropagation, without requiring separate learning phases or infinitesimal nudging. However, the algorithm has the drawback that its numerical stability relies on symmetric nudging, which may be restrictive in biological and analog implementations. In this work we first provide a solid foundation for the objective underlying the dual propagation method, which also reveals a surprising connection with adversarial robustness. Second, we demonstrate how dual propagation is related to a particular adjoint state method, which is stable regardless of asymmetric nudging.
6/26/2024
🧠
Learning time-scales in two-layers neural networks
Raphael Berthier, Andrea Montanari, Kangjie Zhou
0
0
Gradient-based learning in multi-layer neural networks displays a number of striking features. In particular, the decrease rate of empirical risk is non-monotone even after averaging over large batches. Long plateaus in which one observes barely any progress alternate with intervals of rapid decrease. These successive phases of learning often take place on very different time scales. Finally, models learnt in an early phase are typically `simpler' or `easier to learn' although in a way that is difficult to formalize. Although theoretical explanations of these phenomena have been put forward, each of them captures at best certain specific regimes. In this paper, we study the gradient flow dynamics of a wide two-layer neural network in high-dimension, when data are distributed according to a single-index model (i.e., the target function depends on a one-dimensional projection of the covariates). Based on a mixture of new rigorous results, non-rigorous mathematical derivations, and numerical simulations, we propose a scenario for the learning dynamics in this setting. In particular, the proposed evolution exhibits separation of timescales and intermittency. These behaviors arise naturally because the population gradient flow can be recast as a singularly perturbed dynamical system.
4/19/2024
🧠
Stretched and measured neural predictions of complex network dynamics
Vaiva Vasiliauskaite, Nino Antulov-Fantulin
0
0
Differential equations are a ubiquitous tool to study dynamics, ranging from physical systems to complex systems, where a large number of agents interact through a graph with non-trivial topological features. Data-driven approximations of differential equations present a promising alternative to traditional methods for uncovering a model of dynamical systems, especially in complex systems that lack explicit first principles. A recently employed machine learning tool for studying dynamics is neural networks, which can be used for data-driven solution finding or discovery of differential equations. Specifically for the latter task, however, deploying deep learning models in unfamiliar settings - such as predicting dynamics in unobserved state space regions or on novel graphs - can lead to spurious results. Focusing on complex systems whose dynamics are described with a system of first-order differential equations coupled through a graph, we show that extending the model's generalizability beyond traditional statistical learning theory limits is feasible. However, achieving this advanced level of generalization requires neural network models to conform to fundamental assumptions about the dynamical model. Additionally, we propose a statistical significance test to assess prediction quality during inference, enabling the identification of a neural network's confidence level in its predictions.
4/26/2024
🏋️
Identifying Equivalent Training Dynamics
William T. Redman, Juan M. Bello-Rivas, Maria Fonoberova, Ryan Mohr, Ioannis G. Kevrekidis, Igor Mezi'c
0
0
Study of the nonlinear evolution deep neural network (DNN) parameters undergo during training has uncovered regimes of distinct dynamical behavior. While a detailed understanding of these phenomena has the potential to advance improvements in training efficiency and robustness, the lack of methods for identifying when DNN models have equivalent dynamics limits the insight that can be gained from prior work. Topological conjugacy, a notion from dynamical systems theory, provides a precise definition of dynamical equivalence, offering a possible route to address this need. However, topological conjugacies have historically been challenging to compute. By leveraging advances in Koopman operator theory, we develop a framework for identifying conjugate and non-conjugate training dynamics. To validate our approach, we demonstrate that it can correctly identify a known equivalence between online mirror descent and online gradient descent. We then utilize it to: identify non-conjugate training dynamics between shallow and wide fully connected neural networks; characterize the early phase of training dynamics in convolutional neural networks; uncover non-conjugate training dynamics in Transformers that do and do not undergo grokking. Our results, across a range of DNN architectures, illustrate the flexibility of our framework and highlight its potential for shedding new light on training dynamics.
6/5/2024