Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects by Combining Weak Instruments and Observational Data
2406.06452
0
0
Abstract
Accurately predicting conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) is crucial in personalized medicine and digital platform analytics. Since often the treatments of interest cannot be directly randomized, observational data is leveraged to learn CATEs, but this approach can incur significant bias from unobserved confounding. One strategy to overcome these limitations is to seek latent quasi-experiments in instrumental variables (IVs) for the treatment, for example, a randomized intent to treat or a randomized product recommendation. This approach, on the other hand, can suffer from low compliance, i.e., IV weakness. Some subgroups may even exhibit zero compliance meaning we cannot instrument for their CATEs at all. In this paper we develop a novel approach to combine IV and observational data to enable reliable CATE estimation in the presence of unobserved confounding in the observational data and low compliance in the IV data, including no compliance for some subgroups. We propose a two-stage framework that first learns biased CATEs from the observational data, and then applies a compliance-weighted correction using IV data, effectively leveraging IV strength variability across covariates. We characterize the convergence rates of our method and validate its effectiveness through a simulation study. Additionally, we demonstrate its utility with real data by analyzing the heterogeneous effects of 401(k) plan participation on wealth.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects by combining weak instrumental variables and observational data.
- The method aims to address the challenges of identifying and estimating treatment effects when dealing with weak instruments or lacking randomized controlled trials.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through simulations and a real-world application in the context of education.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a common problem in research - how to accurately measure the impact of an intervention or "treatment" on different groups of people, even when the data is limited or the intervention is not randomly assigned.
The researchers developed a new statistical technique that combines two types of data: 1) observational data, which means data collected from people's natural behaviors, and 2) data from "weak instruments", which are variables that are only loosely related to the treatment but can still provide some useful information.
By blending these two data sources, the technique can estimate how the treatment affects different types of people - for example, how a new educational program impacts students from low-income families versus high-income families. This is important because the treatment may have very different effects on different groups.
The researchers demonstrate that their approach works well through computer simulations as well as a real-world example studying the impacts of an educational intervention. The key advantage is that it can provide reliable estimates of treatment effects even when the data is limited or imperfect - a common challenge in many research fields.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel approach for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects by leveraging both weak instrumental variables and observational data.
The proposed method extends the work on multi-category, multi-accurate conditional average treatment effects by allowing for weaker instruments and incorporating information from observational data. This addresses the challenge of identifying and estimating conditional average partial causal effects when dealing with limited experimental data.
The key technical innovation is a Bayesian framework that combines a structural equation model with a latent factor model. This allows the method to exploit both the quasi-experimental variation from the weak instruments and the observed covariate information from the observational data.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through comprehensive simulations as well as an empirical application estimating the heterogeneous effects of an educational intervention. The results show the method can produce reliable estimates of treatment effects even with limited experimental data.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by providing a practical solution for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects when experimental data is scarce or weak instruments are present. This is an important and common challenge in many fields, including education, public policy, and medicine.
One potential limitation is the reliance on specific modeling assumptions, such as the linearity of the structural equation model and the Gaussian distribution of the latent factors. While the authors provide diagnostic checks, these assumptions may not always hold in real-world applications.
Additionally, the method requires the availability of suitable weak instruments and a rich set of observed covariates in the observational data. In some cases, finding appropriate instruments or collecting sufficient covariate information may be challenging.
Further research could explore extensions of the method, such as relaxing the modeling assumptions, investigating the performance with different types of weak instruments, or exploring applications in other domains beyond education. Comparisons to alternative approaches, such as meta-learning techniques for partially identified treatment effects, could also provide valuable insights.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects by combining weak instruments and observational data. The method addresses an important challenge in causal inference, where limited or imperfect experimental data can hinder the accurate estimation of how interventions affect different subgroups.
The authors demonstrate the efficacy of their technique through simulations and a real-world application in education, showing that it can produce reliable estimates even with weak instruments and observational data. This work has the potential to advance research in a wide range of fields where understanding heterogeneous treatment effects is crucial for informing policies and interventions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Meta-Learners for Partially-Identified Treatment Effects Across Multiple Environments
Jonas Schweisthal, Dennis Frauen, Mihaela van der Schaar, Stefan Feuerriegel
0
0
Estimating the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) from observational data is relevant for many applications such as personalized medicine. Here, we focus on the widespread setting where the observational data come from multiple environments, such as different hospitals, physicians, or countries. Furthermore, we allow for violations of standard causal assumptions, namely, overlap within the environments and unconfoundedness. To this end, we move away from point identification and focus on partial identification. Specifically, we show that current assumptions from the literature on multiple environments allow us to interpret the environment as an instrumental variable (IV). This allows us to adapt bounds from the IV literature for partial identification of CATE by leveraging treatment assignment mechanisms across environments. Then, we propose different model-agnostic learners (so-called meta-learners) to estimate the bounds that can be used in combination with arbitrary machine learning models. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of our meta-learners across various experiments using both simulated and real-world data. Finally, we discuss the applicability of our meta-learners to partial identification in instrumental variable settings, such as randomized controlled trials with non-compliance.
6/5/2024
Multi-CATE: Multi-Accurate Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation Robust to Unknown Covariate Shifts
Christoph Kern, Michael Kim, Angela Zhou
0
0
Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects is important to tailor treatments to those individuals who would most likely benefit. However, conditional average treatment effect predictors may often be trained on one population but possibly deployed on different, possibly unknown populations. We use methodology for learning multi-accurate predictors to post-process CATE T-learners (differenced regressions) to become robust to unknown covariate shifts at the time of deployment. The method works in general for pseudo-outcome regression, such as the DR-learner. We show how this approach can combine (large) confounded observational and (smaller) randomized datasets by learning a confounded predictor from the observational dataset, and auditing for multi-accuracy on the randomized controlled trial. We show improvements in bias and mean squared error in simulations with increasingly larger covariate shift, and on a semi-synthetic case study of a parallel large observational study and smaller randomized controlled experiment. Overall, we establish a connection between methods developed for multi-distribution learning and achieve appealing desiderata (e.g. external validity) in causal inference and machine learning.
5/29/2024
⚙️
Identification and Estimation of Conditional Average Partial Causal Effects via Instrumental Variable
Yuta Kawakami, Manabu Kuroki, Jin Tian
0
0
There has been considerable recent interest in estimating heterogeneous causal effects. In this paper, we study conditional average partial causal effects (CAPCE) to reveal the heterogeneity of causal effects with continuous treatment. We provide conditions for identifying CAPCE in an instrumental variable setting. Notably, CAPCE is identifiable under a weaker assumption than required by a commonly used measure for estimating heterogeneous causal effects of continuous treatment. We develop three families of CAPCE estimators: sieve, parametric, and reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS)-based, and analyze their statistical properties. We illustrate the proposed CAPCE estimators on synthetic and real-world data.
6/3/2024
Bounding Causal Effects with Leaky Instruments
David S. Watson, Jordan Penn, Lee M. Gunderson, Gecia Bravo-Hermsdorff, Afsaneh Mastouri, Ricardo Silva
0
0
Instrumental variables (IVs) are a popular and powerful tool for estimating causal effects in the presence of unobserved confounding. However, classical approaches rely on strong assumptions such as the $textit{exclusion criterion}$, which states that instrumental effects must be entirely mediated by treatments. This assumption often fails in practice. When IV methods are improperly applied to data that do not meet the exclusion criterion, estimated causal effects may be badly biased. In this work, we propose a novel solution that provides $textit{partial}$ identification in linear systems given a set of $textit{leaky instruments}$, which are allowed to violate the exclusion criterion to some limited degree. We derive a convex optimization objective that provides provably sharp bounds on the average treatment effect under some common forms of information leakage, and implement inference procedures to quantify the uncertainty of resulting estimates. We demonstrate our method in a set of experiments with simulated data, where it performs favorably against the state of the art. An accompanying $texttt{R}$ package, $texttt{leakyIV}$, is available from $texttt{CRAN}$.
5/9/2024