Evaluating Quality of Answers for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Strong LLM Is All You Need
2406.18064
0
0
Abstract
We present a comprehensive evaluation of answer quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) applications using vRAG-Eval, a novel grading system that is designed to assess correctness, completeness, and honesty. We further map the grading of quality aspects aforementioned into a binary score, indicating an accept or reject decision, mirroring the intuitive thumbs-up or thumbs-down gesture commonly used in chat applications. This approach suits factual business settings where a clear decision opinion is essential. Our assessment applies vRAG-Eval to two Large Language Models (LLMs), evaluating the quality of answers generated by a vanilla RAG application. We compare these evaluations with human expert judgments and find a substantial alignment between GPT-4's assessments and those of human experts, reaching 83% agreement on accept or reject decisions. This study highlights the potential of LLMs as reliable evaluators in closed-domain, closed-ended settings, particularly when human evaluations require significant resources.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper evaluates the performance of large language models (LLMs) in answering questions, with a focus on the quality of answers produced by retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models.
- The authors find that a strong LLM alone can outperform more complex RAG models on various question-answering tasks, challenging the common assumption that retrieval-augmented approaches are necessary for good performance.
- The paper provides insights into the capabilities and limitations of current LLMs and RAG models, and explores the implications for the future development of question-answering systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how well large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text - perform at answering questions. Specifically, the researchers looked at a type of model called "retrieval-augmented generation" (RAG), which combines an LLM with a retrieval system to find relevant information to include in the answers.
The key finding is that a strong LLM on its own can actually outperform more complex RAG models on various question-answering tasks. This challenges the common assumption that retrieval-augmented approaches are necessary to get good results.
The paper provides important insights into the current capabilities and limitations of LLMs and RAG models. This information can help guide the future development of question-answering systems, as researchers work to create AI assistants that can effectively and reliably answer a wide range of questions.
Technical Explanation
The paper Evaluating Quality of Answers for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Strong LLM Is All You Need evaluates the performance of large language models (LLMs) in answering questions, with a focus on the quality of answers produced by retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models.
The authors conducted experiments on several question-answering datasets, comparing the performance of RAG models to that of standalone LLMs. They found that a strong LLM alone can outperform more complex RAG models, challenging the assumption that retrieval-augmented approaches are necessary for good performance.
The paper provides insights into the current capabilities and limitations of LLMs and RAG models, and explores the implications for the future development of question-answering systems. The authors also discuss the automated evaluation of retrieval-augmented language models, which is an important consideration in assessing the performance of these systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling case that a strong LLM can outperform more complex RAG models on certain question-answering tasks. However, the authors acknowledge that there may be some tasks or use cases where the retrieval component of RAG models could provide additional benefits not captured in their experiments.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the quality of answers produced by these models, but does not delve deeply into other important factors such as the efficiency, robustness, or fairness of the systems. Further research may be needed to fully understand the tradeoffs and limitations of LLM-based and retrieval-augmented approaches to question answering.
It is also worth noting that the field of language modeling and question answering is rapidly evolving, and the relative performance of LLMs and RAG models may change as new advancements are made in these areas.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the current state of large language models and retrieval-augmented generation systems for question answering. The key finding that a strong LLM can outperform more complex RAG models challenges common assumptions and has important implications for the future development of AI-powered question-answering systems.
While the paper focuses on answer quality, further research is needed to fully understand the tradeoffs and limitations of these approaches. As the field continues to evolve, this work contributes to our understanding of the capabilities and potential of large language models in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
A Survey on RAG Meets LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Wenqi Fan, Yujuan Ding, Liangbo Ning, Shijie Wang, Hengyun Li, Dawei Yin, Tat-Seng Chua, Qing Li
0
0
As one of the most advanced techniques in AI, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can offer reliable and up-to-date external knowledge, providing huge convenience for numerous tasks. Particularly in the era of AI-Generated Content (AIGC), the powerful capacity of retrieval in providing additional knowledge enables RAG to assist existing generative AI in producing high-quality outputs. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated revolutionary abilities in language understanding and generation, while still facing inherent limitations, such as hallucinations and out-of-date internal knowledge. Given the powerful abilities of RAG in providing the latest and helpful auxiliary information, Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models (RA-LLMs) have emerged to harness external and authoritative knowledge bases, rather than solely relying on the model's internal knowledge, to augment the generation quality of LLMs. In this survey, we comprehensively review existing research studies in RA-LLMs, covering three primary technical perspectives: architectures, training strategies, and applications. As the preliminary knowledge, we briefly introduce the foundations and recent advances of LLMs. Then, to illustrate the practical significance of RAG for LLMs, we systematically review mainstream relevant work by their architectures, training strategies, and application areas, detailing specifically the challenges of each and the corresponding capabilities of RA-LLMs. Finally, to deliver deeper insights, we discuss current limitations and several promising directions for future research. Updated information about this survey can be found at https://advanced-recommender-systems.github.io/RAG-Meets-LLMs/
6/18/2024
✨
Evaluating the Retrieval Component in LLM-Based Question Answering Systems
Ashkan Alinejad, Krtin Kumar, Ali Vahdat
0
0
Question answering systems (QA) utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) heavily depend on the retrieval component to provide them with domain-specific information and reduce the risk of generating inaccurate responses or hallucinations. Although the evaluation of retrievers dates back to the early research in Information Retrieval, assessing their performance within LLM-based chatbots remains a challenge. This study proposes a straightforward baseline for evaluating retrievers in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based chatbots. Our findings demonstrate that this evaluation framework provides a better image of how the retriever performs and is more aligned with the overall performance of the QA system. Although conventional metrics such as precision, recall, and F1 score may not fully capture LLMs' capabilities - as they can yield accurate responses despite imperfect retrievers - our method considers LLMs' strengths to ignore irrelevant contexts, as well as potential errors and hallucinations in their responses.
6/11/2024
Are Large Language Models Good at Utility Judgments?
Hengran Zhang, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Maarten de Rijke, Yixing Fan, Xueqi Cheng
0
0
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is considered to be a promising approach to alleviate the hallucination issue of large language models (LLMs), and it has received widespread attention from researchers recently. Due to the limitation in the semantic understanding of retrieval models, the success of RAG heavily lies on the ability of LLMs to identify passages with utility. Recent efforts have explored the ability of LLMs to assess the relevance of passages in retrieval, but there has been limited work on evaluating the utility of passages in supporting question answering. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive study about the capabilities of LLMs in utility evaluation for open-domain QA. Specifically, we introduce a benchmarking procedure and collection of candidate passages with different characteristics, facilitating a series of experiments with five representative LLMs. Our experiments reveal that: (i) well-instructed LLMs can distinguish between relevance and utility, and that LLMs are highly receptive to newly generated counterfactual passages. Moreover, (ii) we scrutinize key factors that affect utility judgments in the instruction design. And finally, (iii) to verify the efficacy of utility judgments in practical retrieval augmentation applications, we delve into LLMs' QA capabilities using the evidence judged with utility and direct dense retrieval results. (iv) We propose a k-sampling, listwise approach to reduce the dependency of LLMs on the sequence of input passages, thereby facilitating subsequent answer generation. We believe that the way we formalize and study the problem along with our findings contributes to a critical assessment of retrieval-augmented LLMs. Our code and benchmark can be found at url{https://github.com/ict-bigdatalab/utility_judgments}.
6/11/2024
Improving Retrieval for RAG based Question Answering Models on Financial Documents
Spurthi Setty, Katherine Jijo, Eden Chung, Natan Vidra
0
0
The effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating accurate responses relies heavily on the quality of input provided, particularly when employing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques. RAG enhances LLMs by sourcing the most relevant text chunk(s) to base queries upon. Despite the significant advancements in LLMs' response quality in recent years, users may still encounter inaccuracies or irrelevant answers; these issues often stem from suboptimal text chunk retrieval by RAG rather than the inherent capabilities of LLMs. To augment the efficacy of LLMs, it is crucial to refine the RAG process. This paper explores the existing constraints of RAG pipelines and introduces methodologies for enhancing text retrieval. It delves into strategies such as sophisticated chunking techniques, query expansion, the incorporation of metadata annotations, the application of re-ranking algorithms, and the fine-tuning of embedding algorithms. Implementing these approaches can substantially improve the retrieval quality, thereby elevating the overall performance and reliability of LLMs in processing and responding to queries.
4/12/2024