Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models
2406.13094
0
0
Abstract
We seek to elevate the planning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)investigating four main directions. First, we construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning domains and natural language scenarios. This suite includes algorithms to generate instances with varying levels of difficulty, allowing for rigorous and systematic evaluation of LLM performance. Second, we investigate the use of in-context learning (ICL) to enhance LLM planning, exploring the direct relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance. Third, we demonstrate the positive impact of fine-tuning LLMs on optimal planning paths, as well as the effectiveness of incorporating model-driven search procedures. Finally, we investigate the performance of the proposed methods in out-of-distribution scenarios, assessing the ability to generalize to novel and unseen planning challenges.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores and benchmarks the planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), which are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data to understand and generate human-like language.
- The researchers investigate how well LLMs can perform planning tasks, which involve using reasoning and problem-solving skills to develop a sequence of actions to achieve a goal.
- They evaluate the planning capabilities of several prominent LLMs across a diverse set of planning benchmarks, including What's Plan, Large Language Models as Planning Domain Generators, EGOPlan Bench, and Natural Plan.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on understanding how well large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text - can perform planning tasks. Planning tasks involve using reasoning and problem-solving skills to figure out a sequence of actions that will help achieve a particular goal.
The researchers evaluated the planning capabilities of several prominent LLMs, like GPT-3 and PaLM, using a variety of different planning benchmarks. These benchmarks are sets of planning-related problems that the models have to solve, like navigating a maze or scheduling a series of tasks. By testing the models on these benchmarks, the researchers could see how well the LLMs were able to plan and problem-solve.
Overall, the paper provides insights into the current planning capabilities of LLMs and identifies areas where they excel or struggle. This information can help researchers and developers better understand the strengths and limitations of these powerful AI systems and guide the development of more advanced planning-focused techniques.
Technical Explanation
The paper "Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models" investigates the planning abilities of large language models (LLMs). LLMs are AI systems that have been trained on vast amounts of text data, enabling them to understand and generate human-like language.
The researchers evaluate the planning capabilities of several prominent LLMs, including GPT-3, PaLM, and others, across a diverse set of planning benchmarks. These benchmarks include What's Plan, Large Language Models as Planning Domain Generators, EGOPlan Bench, and Natural Plan.
The researchers use a variety of evaluation metrics to assess the planning capabilities of the LLMs, such as their ability to generate valid plans, the quality and efficiency of their plans, and their ability to handle different types of planning problems.
Through their extensive experiments, the researchers gain insights into the current planning capabilities of LLMs, identifying areas where they excel and where they struggle. This information can help guide the development of more advanced planning-focused techniques and inform the further exploration of LLMs as powerful problem-solving tools.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of the planning capabilities of large language models, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.
One key limitation is that the benchmarks used in the study may not fully capture the real-world complexity of planning tasks. The researchers note that the benchmarks are often simplified or idealized, and they encourage the development of more realistic and challenging planning scenarios to further test the capabilities of LLMs.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential biases or safety concerns that may arise from using LLMs for planning tasks. As these models are trained on large datasets that can reflect societal biases, there is a risk of the models perpetuating or amplifying harmful biases in their planning decisions. Further research is needed to address these important ethical considerations.
The paper also highlights the need for more research on the interpretability and explainability of LLM-based planning systems. The inner workings of these models can be opaque, making it difficult to understand how they arrive at their planning decisions. Developing more transparent and accountable planning systems is an important area for future work.
Overall, the paper provides valuable insights into the current state of planning capabilities in large language models, but it also underscores the need for continued research and development to address the limitations and challenges in this rapidly evolving field.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive exploration and benchmarking of the planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The researchers evaluate the performance of several prominent LLMs, including GPT-3 and PaLM, across a diverse set of planning benchmarks, such as What's Plan, Large Language Models as Planning Domain Generators, EGOPlan Bench, and Natural Plan.
The findings provide valuable insights into the current planning capabilities of LLMs, highlighting their strengths and limitations. While LLMs have demonstrated impressive language understanding and generation abilities, the paper shows that they still face challenges in effectively solving complex planning tasks. The researchers emphasize the need for further research and development to address these limitations and unlock the full potential of LLMs as powerful problem-solving tools.
The insights from this paper can help guide the ongoing advancement of planning-focused techniques and the responsible development of LLM-based planning systems. As these powerful AI models continue to evolve, a deeper understanding of their planning capabilities will be crucial for shaping the future of artificial intelligence and its real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
What's the Plan? Evaluating and Developing Planning-Aware Techniques for Language Models
Eran Hirsch, Guy Uziel, Ateret Anaby-Tavor
0
0
Planning is a fundamental task in artificial intelligence that involves finding a sequence of actions that achieve a specified goal in a given environment. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for applications that require planning capabilities, such as web or embodied agents. In line with recent studies, we demonstrate through experimentation that LLMs lack necessary skills required for planning. Based on these observations, we advocate for the potential of a hybrid approach that combines LLMs with classical planning methodology. Then, we introduce SimPlan, a novel hybrid-method, and evaluate its performance in a new challenging setup. Our extensive experiments across various planning domains demonstrate that SimPlan significantly outperforms existing LLM-based planners.
5/24/2024
💬
Large Language Models as Planning Domain Generators
James Oswald, Kavitha Srinivas, Harsha Kokel, Junkyu Lee, Michael Katz, Shirin Sohrabi
0
0
Developing domain models is one of the few remaining places that require manual human labor in AI planning. Thus, in order to make planning more accessible, it is desirable to automate the process of domain model generation. To this end, we investigate if large language models (LLMs) can be used to generate planning domain models from simple textual descriptions. Specifically, we introduce a framework for automated evaluation of LLM-generated domains by comparing the sets of plans for domain instances. Finally, we perform an empirical analysis of 7 large language models, including coding and chat models across 9 different planning domains, and under three classes of natural language domain descriptions. Our results indicate that LLMs, particularly those with high parameter counts, exhibit a moderate level of proficiency in generating correct planning domains from natural language descriptions. Our code is available at https://github.com/IBM/NL2PDDL.
5/14/2024
EgoPlan-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Human-Level Planning
Yi Chen, Yuying Ge, Yixiao Ge, Mingyu Ding, Bohao Li, Rui Wang, Ruifeng Xu, Ying Shan, Xihui Liu
0
0
The pursuit of artificial general intelligence (AGI) has been accelerated by Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), which exhibit superior reasoning, generalization capabilities, and proficiency in processing multimodal inputs. A crucial milestone in the evolution of AGI is the attainment of human-level planning, a fundamental ability for making informed decisions in complex environments, and solving a wide range of real-world problems. Despite the impressive advancements in MLLMs, a question remains: How far are current MLLMs from achieving human-level planning? To shed light on this question, we introduce EgoPlan-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate the planning abilities of MLLMs in real-world scenarios from an egocentric perspective, mirroring human perception. EgoPlan-Bench emphasizes the evaluation of planning capabilities of MLLMs, featuring realistic tasks, diverse action plans, and intricate visual observations. Our rigorous evaluation of a wide range of MLLMs reveals that EgoPlan-Bench poses significant challenges, highlighting a substantial scope for improvement in MLLMs to achieve human-level task planning. To facilitate this advancement, we further present EgoPlan-IT, a specialized instruction-tuning dataset that effectively enhances model performance on EgoPlan-Bench. We have made all codes, data, and a maintained benchmark leaderboard available to advance future research.
6/12/2024
NATURAL PLAN: Benchmarking LLMs on Natural Language Planning
Huaixiu Steven Zheng, Swaroop Mishra, Hugh Zhang, Xinyun Chen, Minmin Chen, Azade Nova, Le Hou, Heng-Tze Cheng, Quoc V. Le, Ed H. Chi, Denny Zhou
0
0
We introduce NATURAL PLAN, a realistic planning benchmark in natural language containing 3 key tasks: Trip Planning, Meeting Planning, and Calendar Scheduling. We focus our evaluation on the planning capabilities of LLMs with full information on the task, by providing outputs from tools such as Google Flights, Google Maps, and Google Calendar as contexts to the models. This eliminates the need for a tool-use environment for evaluating LLMs on Planning. We observe that NATURAL PLAN is a challenging benchmark for state of the art models. For example, in Trip Planning, GPT-4 and Gemini 1.5 Pro could only achieve 31.1% and 34.8% solve rate respectively. We find that model performance drops drastically as the complexity of the problem increases: all models perform below 5% when there are 10 cities, highlighting a significant gap in planning in natural language for SoTA LLMs. We also conduct extensive ablation studies on NATURAL PLAN to further shed light on the (in)effectiveness of approaches such as self-correction, few-shot generalization, and in-context planning with long-contexts on improving LLM planning.
6/10/2024