Exploring knowledge graph-based neural-symbolic system from application perspective
2405.03524
0
0
đ ď¸
Abstract
Advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deep neural networks have driven significant progress in vision and text processing. However, achieving human-like reasoning and interpretability in AI systems remains a substantial challenge. The Neural-Symbolic paradigm, which integrates neural networks with symbolic systems, presents a promising pathway toward more interpretable AI. Within this paradigm, Knowledge Graphs (KG) are crucial, offering a structured and dynamic method for representing knowledge through interconnected entities and relationships, typically as triples (subject, predicate, object). This paper explores recent advancements in neural-symbolic integration based on KG, examining how it supports integration in three categories: enhancing the reasoning and interpretability of neural networks with symbolic knowledge (Symbol for Neural), refining the completeness and accuracy of symbolic systems via neural network methodologies (Neural for Symbol), and facilitating their combined application in Hybrid Neural-Symbolic Integration. It highlights current trends and proposes future research directions in Neural-Symbolic AI.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep neural networks, have led to significant progress in fields like vision and text processing.
- However, the pursuit of AI systems that exhibit human-like reasoning and interpretability remains a substantial challenge.
- The Neural-Symbolic paradigm integrates the deep learning prowess of neural networks with the reasoning capabilities of symbolic systems, offering a promising pathway toward developing more transparent and comprehensible AI.
- The Knowledge Graph (KG) is a crucial element within the Neural-Symbolic paradigm, providing a structured and dynamic method for representing knowledge through interconnected entities and relationships.
Plain English Explanation
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made amazing advancements, especially in areas like computer vision and language processing. However, creating AI systems that can think and reason like humans is still a significant challenge.
The Neural-Symbolic approach tries to address this by combining the powerful learning capabilities of neural networks with the logical reasoning abilities of symbolic systems. A key part of this approach is the Knowledge Graph (KG), which is a way of representing knowledge as a network of interconnected concepts and relationships.
The researchers in this paper explore how KGs can be used to enhance the reasoning and interpretability of neural networks, refine the accuracy of symbolic systems, and integrate the two approaches to create more transparent and understandable AI.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines recent advancements in the integration of neural networks and symbolic systems, with a focus on the role of Knowledge Graphs (KGs) in facilitating this integration.
The authors categorize the integration into three key areas:
- Symbol for Neural: Enhancing the reasoning and interpretability of neural networks through the incorporation of symbolic knowledge from KGs.
- Neural for Symbol: Refining the completeness and accuracy of symbolic systems via neural network methodologies.
- Hybrid Neural-Symbolic Integration: Combining the strengths of both approaches to create more comprehensible AI systems.
The paper highlights current trends and proposes directions for future research in the domain of Neural-Symbolic AI, emphasizing the potential of KGs to bridge the gap between neural networks and symbolic reasoning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in neural-symbolic integration, underscoring the crucial role of Knowledge Graphs in this endeavor. However, the authors acknowledge the ongoing challenges in fully realizing the potential of this paradigm, such as the difficulty in seamlessly integrating the strengths of neural networks and symbolic systems.
One area that could have been explored further is the limitations and biases inherent in the construction and representation of knowledge within KGs. As the foundation for neural-symbolic integration, the quality and reliability of KGs can have a significant impact on the performance and interpretability of the resulting AI systems.
Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the practical considerations and trade-offs involved in deploying these neural-symbolic approaches in real-world applications, such as the computational overhead, scalability, and the potential for unexpected emergent behaviors.
Conclusion
This paper provides a valuable exploration of the Neural-Symbolic paradigm and the central role of Knowledge Graphs in advancing the development of more transparent and comprehensible AI systems. By highlighting the key integration strategies and current research trends, the authors lay the groundwork for further advancements in this promising field. As the pursuit of human-like reasoning in AI continues, the insights gained from this research could contribute to the creation of more robust, interpretable, and trustworthy artificial intelligence solutions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
đ¤
Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey
Lauren Nicole DeLong (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute), Ramon Fern'andez Mir (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute), Jacques D. Fleuriot (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute)
0
0
Neurosymbolic AI is an increasingly active area of research that combines symbolic reasoning methods with deep learning to leverage their complementary benefits. As knowledge graphs are becoming a popular way to represent heterogeneous and multi-relational data, methods for reasoning on graph structures have attempted to follow this neurosymbolic paradigm. Traditionally, such approaches have utilized either rule-based inference or generated representative numerical embeddings from which patterns could be extracted. However, several recent studies have attempted to bridge this dichotomy to generate models that facilitate interpretability, maintain competitive performance, and integrate expert knowledge. Therefore, we survey methods that perform neurosymbolic reasoning tasks on knowledge graphs and propose a novel taxonomy by which we can classify them. Specifically, we propose three major categories: (1) logically-informed embedding approaches, (2) embedding approaches with logical constraints, and (3) rule learning approaches. Alongside the taxonomy, we provide a tabular overview of the approaches and links to their source code, if available, for more direct comparison. Finally, we discuss the unique characteristics and limitations of these methods, then propose several prospective directions toward which this field of research could evolve.
5/17/2024
đ
New!A Semantic Framework for Neural-Symbolic Computing
Simon Odense, Artur d'Avila Garcez
0
0
Two approaches to AI, neural networks and symbolic systems, have been proven very successful for an array of AI problems. However, neither has been able to achieve the general reasoning ability required for human-like intelligence. It has been argued that this is due to inherent weaknesses in each approach. Luckily, these weaknesses appear to be complementary, with symbolic systems being adept at the kinds of things neural networks have trouble with and vice-versa. The field of neural-symbolic AI attempts to exploit this asymmetry by combining neural networks and symbolic AI into integrated systems. Often this has been done by encoding symbolic knowledge into neural networks. Unfortunately, although many different methods for this have been proposed, there is no common definition of an encoding to compare them. We seek to rectify this problem by introducing a semantic framework for neural-symbolic AI, which is then shown to be general enough to account for a large family of neural-symbolic systems. We provide a number of examples and proofs of the application of the framework to the neural encoding of various forms of knowledge representation and neural network. These, at first sight disparate approaches, are all shown to fall within the framework's formal definition of what we call semantic encoding for neural-symbolic AI.
7/1/2024
đ§
Aligning Knowledge Graphs Provided by Humans and Generated from Neural Networks in Specific Tasks
Tangrui Li, Jun Zhou
0
0
This paper develops an innovative method that enables neural networks to generate and utilize knowledge graphs, which describe their concept-level knowledge and optimize network parameters through alignment with human-provided knowledge. This research addresses a gap where traditionally, network-generated knowledge has been limited to applications in downstream symbolic analysis or enhancing network transparency. By integrating a novel autoencoder design with the Vector Symbolic Architecture (VSA), we have introduced auxiliary tasks that support end-to-end training. Our approach eschews traditional dependencies on ontologies or word embedding models, mining concepts from neural networks and directly aligning them with human knowledge. Experiments show that our method consistently captures network-generated concepts that align closely with human knowledge and can even uncover new, useful concepts not previously identified by humans. This plug-and-play strategy not only enhances the interpretability of neural networks but also facilitates the integration of symbolic logical reasoning within these systems.
4/29/2024
SymbolicAI: A framework for logic-based approaches combining generative models and solvers
Marius-Constantin Dinu, Claudiu Leoveanu-Condrei, Markus Holzleitner, Werner Zellinger, Sepp Hochreiter
0
0
We introduce SymbolicAI, a versatile and modular framework employing a logic-based approach to concept learning and flow management in generative processes. SymbolicAI enables the seamless integration of generative models with a diverse range of solvers by treating large language models (LLMs) as semantic parsers that execute tasks based on both natural and formal language instructions, thus bridging the gap between symbolic reasoning and generative AI. We leverage probabilistic programming principles to tackle complex tasks, and utilize differentiable and classical programming paradigms with their respective strengths. The framework introduces a set of polymorphic, compositional, and self-referential operations for multi-modal data that connects multi-step generative processes and aligns their outputs with user objectives in complex workflows. As a result, we can transition between the capabilities of various foundation models with in-context learning capabilities and specialized, fine-tuned models or solvers proficient in addressing specific problems. Through these operations based on in-context learning our framework enables the creation and evaluation of explainable computational graphs. Finally, we introduce a quality measure and its empirical score for evaluating these computational graphs, and propose a benchmark that compares various state-of-the-art LLMs across a set of complex workflows. We refer to the empirical score as the Vector Embedding for Relational Trajectory Evaluation through Cross-similarity, or VERTEX score for short. The framework codebase and benchmark are linked below.
5/28/2024