Exploring the limitations of blood pressure estimation using the photoplethysmography signal
2404.16049
0
0
✨
Abstract
Hypertension, a leading contributor to cardiovascular morbidity, underscores the need for accurate and continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Photoplethysmography (PPG) presents a promising approach to this end. However, the precision of BP estimates derived from PPG signals has been the subject of ongoing debate, necessitating a comprehensive evaluation of their effectiveness and constraints. We developed a calibration-based Siamese ResNet model for BP estimation, using a signal input paired with a reference BP reading. We compared the use of normalized PPG (N-PPG) against the normalized Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure (N-IABP) signals as input. The N-IABP signals do not directly present systolic and diastolic values but theoretically provide a more accurate BP measure than PPG signals since it is a direct pressure sensor inside the body. Our strategy establishes a critical benchmark for PPG performance, realistically calibrating expectations for PPG's BP estimation capabilities. Nonetheless, we compared the performance of our models using different signal-filtering conditions to evaluate the impact of filtering on the results. We evaluated our method using the AAMI and the BHS standards employing the VitalDB dataset. The N-IABP signals meet with AAMI standards for both Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), with errors of 1.29+-6.33mmHg for systolic pressure and 1.17+-5.78mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure respectively for the raw N-IABP signal. In contrast, N-PPG signals, in their best setup, exhibited inferior performance than N-IABP, presenting 1.49+-11.82mmHg and 0.89+-7.27mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure respectively. Our findings highlight the potential and limitations of employing PPG for BP estimation, showing that these signals contain information correlated to BP but may not be sufficient for predicting it accurately.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Hypertension, a major contributor to heart disease, highlights the need for accurate and continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring.
- Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a promising approach, but the accuracy of BP estimates from PPG signals has been debated.
- The researchers developed a calibration-based Siamese ResNet model to estimate BP using PPG signals and compared it to using normalized Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure (N-IABP) signals.
- N-IABP signals, which directly measure pressure inside the body, provide a more accurate benchmark for evaluating PPG's BP estimation capabilities.
- The researchers also examined the impact of signal filtering on the results.
Plain English Explanation
High blood pressure, also known as hypertension, is a significant risk factor for heart disease and other cardiovascular problems. Accurately and continuously monitoring an individual's blood pressure is crucial for managing this condition. Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a promising technique that can be used to estimate blood pressure without the need for a traditional cuff-based device. However, the accuracy of blood pressure estimates derived from PPG signals has been a subject of ongoing debate.
To address this, the researchers developed a machine learning model called a Siamese ResNet that can estimate blood pressure using PPG signals. They compared the performance of this model when using PPG signals to when using a more direct measure of blood pressure, called Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure (IABP). IABP signals are obtained by directly measuring the pressure inside the body and are considered a more accurate reference for blood pressure.
The researchers also investigated the impact of applying different signal filtering techniques on the performance of their models. Filtering is a common pre-processing step in signal processing that can help improve the quality of the data.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a calibration-based Siamese ResNet model to estimate blood pressure from PPG signals. They compared the performance of this model when using normalized PPG (N-PPG) signals versus normalized IABP (N-IABP) signals as input.
The N-IABP signals do not directly provide systolic and diastolic blood pressure values, but they are considered a more accurate reference for blood pressure since they directly measure the pressure inside the body. By comparing the performance of the model using N-PPG and N-IABP signals, the researchers could establish a critical benchmark for evaluating the capabilities and limitations of using PPG for blood pressure estimation.
The researchers evaluated their method using the AAMI and BHS standards, which are widely used protocols for assessing the accuracy of blood pressure measurement devices. They used the VitalDB dataset, which contains both PPG and IABP signals.
The results showed that the N-IABP signals met the AAMI standards for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, with errors of 1.29±6.33 mmHg for systolic pressure and 1.17±5.78 mmHg for diastolic pressure. In contrast, the N-PPG signals, even in their best setup, exhibited inferior performance, with errors of 1.49±11.82 mmHg and 0.89±7.27 mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure, respectively.
These findings highlight the potential and limitations of using PPG for blood pressure estimation. While PPG signals do contain information related to blood pressure, they may not be sufficient for accurately predicting it, as the IABP signals, which directly measure pressure, outperformed the PPG-based estimates.
Critical Analysis
The researchers provide a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of PPG-based blood pressure estimation, using the more accurate IABP signals as a benchmark. This approach establishes a realistic understanding of the capabilities and limitations of PPG for this task.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential impact of signal filtering on the results. While the researchers did compare the performance of their models under different filtering conditions, they did not provide a detailed analysis of how the filtering techniques affected the results. A more in-depth discussion of the influence of signal processing on the performance of PPG-based blood pressure estimation would be valuable.
Additionally, the researchers focused on evaluating their models using established standards, such as AAMI and BHS. While these are widely used protocols, they do not necessarily capture all the nuances and real-world challenges of blood pressure monitoring. Exploring the performance of the models in more diverse and realistic scenarios, such as during physical activity or in different patient populations, could provide additional insights into the practical applications of PPG-based blood pressure estimation.
Conclusion
This research highlights the potential of using PPG signals for blood pressure estimation, but also underscores the limitations of this approach compared to the more direct IABP measurement. The researchers' calibration-based Siamese ResNet model provides a critical benchmark for evaluating the performance of PPG-based blood pressure estimation, which is crucial for understanding the practical applications and limitations of this technology.
While PPG-based methods offer the advantages of being non-invasive and potentially more accessible, the findings suggest that they may not yet be sufficient for accurately predicting blood pressure, especially in comparison to the more direct IABP measurement. Continued research and development in this area, including exploring the impact of signal processing and evaluating the models in diverse real-world scenarios, will be important for advancing the use of PPG for continuous and accurate blood pressure monitoring.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
Deep Learning Classification of Photoplethysmogram Signal for Hypertension Levels
Nida Nasir, Mustafa Sameer, Feras Barneih, Omar Alshaltone, Muneeb Ahmed
0
0
Continuous photoplethysmography (PPG)-based blood pressure monitoring is necessary for healthcare and fitness applications. In Artificial Intelligence (AI), signal classification levels with the machine and deep learning arrangements need to be explored further. Techniques based on time-frequency spectra, such as Short-time Fourier Transform (STFT), have been used to address the challenges of motion artifact correction. Therefore, the proposed study works with PPG signals of more than 200 patients (650+ signal samples) with hypertension, using STFT with various Neural Networks (Convolution Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM), followed by machine learning classifiers, such as, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF). The classification has been done for two categories: Prehypertension (normal levels) and Hypertension (includes Stage I and Stage II). Various performance metrics have been obtained with two batch sizes of 3 and 16 for the fusion of the neural networks. With precision and specificity of 100% and recall of 82.1%, the LSTM model provides the best results among all combinations of Neural Networks. However, the maximum accuracy of 71.9% is achieved by the LSTM-CNN model. Further stacked Ensemble method has been used to achieve 100% accuracy for Meta-LSTM-RF, Meta- LSTM-CNN-RF and Meta- STFT-CNN-SVM.
5/24/2024
Cuff-less Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform Synthesis from Single-site PPG using Transformer & Frequency-domain Learning
Muhammad Wasim Nawaz, Muhammad Ahmad Tahir, Ahsan Mehmood, Muhammad Mahboob Ur Rahman, Kashif Riaz, Qammer H. Abbasi
0
0
We develop and evaluate two novel purpose-built deep learning (DL) models for synthesis of the arterial blood pressure (ABP) waveform in a cuff-less manner, using a single-site photoplethysmography (PPG) signal. We train and evaluate our DL models on the data of 209 subjects from the public UCI dataset on cuff-less blood pressure (CLBP) estimation. Our transformer model consists of an encoder-decoder pair that incorporates positional encoding, multi-head attention, layer normalization, and dropout techniques for ABP waveform synthesis. Secondly, under our frequency-domain (FD) learning approach, we first obtain the discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients of the PPG and ABP signals, and then learn a linear/non-linear (L/NL) regression between them. The transformer model (FD L/NL model) synthesizes the ABP waveform with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.01 (4.23). Further, the synthesis of ABP waveform also allows us to estimate the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values. To this end, the transformer model reports an MAE of 3.77 mmHg and 2.69 mmHg, for SBP and DBP, respectively. On the other hand, the FD L/NL method reports an MAE of 4.37 mmHg and 3.91 mmHg, for SBP and DBP, respectively. Both methods fulfill the AAMI criterion. As for the BHS criterion, our transformer model (FD L/NL regression model) achieves grade A (grade B).
6/11/2024
Deep Imbalanced Regression to Estimate Vascular Age from PPG Data: a Novel Digital Biomarker for Cardiovascular Health
Guangkun Nie, Qinghao Zhao, Gongzheng Tang, Jun Li, Shenda Hong
0
0
Photoplethysmography (PPG) is emerging as a crucial tool for monitoring human hemodynamics, with recent studies highlighting its potential in assessing vascular aging through deep learning. However, real-world age distributions are often imbalanced, posing significant challenges for deep learning models. In this paper, we introduce a novel, simple, and effective loss function named the Dist Loss to address deep imbalanced regression tasks. We trained a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (Net1D) incorporating the Dist Loss on the extensive UK Biobank dataset (n=502,389) to estimate vascular age from PPG signals and validate its efficacy in characterizing cardiovascular health. The model's performance was validated on a 40% held-out test set, achieving state-of-the-art results, especially in regions with small sample sizes. Furthermore, we divided the population into three subgroups based on the difference between predicted vascular age and chronological age: less than -10 years, between -10 and 10 years, and greater than 10 years. We analyzed the relationship between predicted vascular age and several cardiovascular events over a follow-up period of up to 10 years, including death, coronary heart disease, and heart failure. Our results indicate that the predicted vascular age has significant potential to reflect an individual's cardiovascular health status. Our code will be available at https://github.com/Ngk03/AI-vascular-age.
6/24/2024
Large Language Models for Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement From Wearable Biosignals
Zengding Liu, Chen Chen, Jiannong Cao, Minglei Pan, Jikui Liu, Nan Li, Fen Miao, Ye Li
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have captured significant interest from both academia and industry due to their impressive performance across various textual tasks. However, the potential of LLMs to analyze physiological time-series data remains an emerging research field. Particularly, there is a notable gap in the utilization of LLMs for analyzing wearable biosignals to achieve cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement, which is critical for the management of cardiovascular diseases. This paper presents the first work to explore the capacity of LLMs to perform cuffless BP estimation based on wearable biosignals. We extracted physiological features from electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals and designed context-enhanced prompts by combining these features with BP domain knowledge and user information. Subsequently, we adapted LLMs to BP estimation tasks through fine-tuning. To evaluate the proposed approach, we conducted assessments of ten advanced LLMs using a comprehensive public dataset of wearable biosignals from 1,272 participants. The experimental results demonstrate that the optimally fine-tuned LLM significantly surpasses conventional task-specific baselines, achieving an estimation error of 0.00 $pm$ 9.25 mmHg for systolic BP and 1.29 $pm$ 6.37 mmHg for diastolic BP. Notably, the ablation studies highlight the benefits of our context enhancement strategy, leading to an 8.9% reduction in mean absolute error for systolic BP estimation. This paper pioneers the exploration of LLMs for cuffless BP measurement, providing a potential solution to enhance the accuracy of cuffless BP measurement.
6/28/2024