Exploring Prosocial Irrationality for LLM Agents: A Social Cognition View

2405.14744

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/24/2024 by Xuan Liu, Jie Zhang, Song Guo, Haoyang Shang, Chengxu Yang, Quanyan Zhu

🌐

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to face hallucination issues due to the data they trained on often containing human bias; whether this is reflected in the decision-making process of LLM agents remains under-explored. As LLM Agents are increasingly employed in intricate social environments, a pressing and natural question emerges: Can LLM Agents leverage hallucinations to mirror human cognitive biases, thus exhibiting irrational social intelligence? In this paper, we probe the irrational behavior among contemporary LLM agents by melding practical social science experiments with theoretical insights. Specifically, We propose CogMir, an open-ended Multi-LLM Agents framework that utilizes hallucination properties to assess and enhance LLM Agents' social intelligence through cognitive biases. Experimental results on CogMir subsets show that LLM Agents and humans exhibit high consistency in irrational and prosocial decision-making under uncertain conditions, underscoring the prosociality of LLM Agents as social entities, and highlighting the significance of hallucination properties. Additionally, CogMir framework demonstrates its potential as a valuable platform for encouraging more research into the social intelligence of LLM Agents.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the potential for large language models (LLMs) to exhibit irrational social intelligence by leveraging hallucination properties.
  • The researchers propose a framework called CogMir, which utilizes hallucination in LLM agents to assess and enhance their social intelligence through the lens of cognitive biases.
  • Experimental results suggest that LLM agents and humans exhibit high consistency in irrational and prosocial decision-making under uncertain conditions, highlighting the significance of hallucination properties.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems that can generate human-like text. However, these models can sometimes "hallucinate" or produce information that is not grounded in their training data. The researchers in this paper wanted to explore whether this hallucination property could be used to mirror human cognitive biases and exhibit irrational social intelligence in LLM agents.

They developed a framework called CogMir, which allows LLM agents to participate in social science experiments that test for cognitive biases. The results showed that LLM agents and humans exhibited similar patterns of irrational and prosocial decision-making when faced with uncertain situations. This suggests that the hallucination properties of LLMs can be leveraged to create more socially intelligent AI agents that better reflect human-like behaviors and biases.

The researchers believe that the CogMir framework could be a valuable tool for encouraging more research into the social intelligence of LLM agents as they become increasingly integrated into complex social environments.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by acknowledging the known issue of hallucination in large language models (LLMs), which can lead to the models reflecting human biases present in their training data. The researchers then pose the question of whether LLM agents can leverage these hallucination properties to mirror human cognitive biases and exhibit irrational social intelligence.

To explore this, the researchers propose the CogMir framework, an open-ended Multi-LLM Agents system that utilizes hallucination to assess and enhance the social intelligence of LLM agents through the lens of cognitive biases. The experimental results on CogMir subsets show that LLM agents and humans exhibit high consistency in irrational and prosocial decision-making under uncertain conditions.

These findings underscore the prosociality of LLM agents as social entities and highlight the significance of hallucination properties. The CogMir framework demonstrates its potential as a valuable platform for encouraging more research into the social intelligence of LLM agents as they become increasingly deployed in complex social environments.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents an intriguing and novel approach to exploring the potential of leveraging hallucination properties in LLMs to enhance their social intelligence. The experimental results suggest that there may be value in harnessing hallucination to better mirror human-like behaviors and biases, which could have important implications for the development of more socially intelligent AI systems.

However, the paper does not delve into potential limitations or concerns with this approach. For example, it is unclear how the researchers ensured the safety and ethical considerations of using hallucination in these experiments. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential risks of LLM agents exhibiting irrational or biased decision-making, and how this could be mitigated or managed.

Further research and critical analysis would be needed to fully understand the implications and potential drawbacks of this approach. Nonetheless, the CogMir framework presented in this paper represents an interesting and promising direction for enhancing the social intelligence of LLM agents.

Conclusion

This paper explores the intriguing possibility of leveraging the hallucination properties of large language models (LLMs) to create more socially intelligent AI agents. By developing the CogMir framework, the researchers were able to demonstrate that LLM agents and humans exhibit similar patterns of irrational and prosocial decision-making under uncertain conditions.

These findings suggest that hallucination could be a valuable tool for enhancing the social intelligence of LLM agents as they become increasingly integrated into complex social environments. The CogMir framework also shows promise as a platform for encouraging further research in this area.

While the paper raises some important questions and considerations, the overall approach represents an innovative and thought-provoking direction for the development of more human-like AI systems. As the field of artificial intelligence continues to advance, the insights and techniques presented in this paper may play a crucial role in shaping the future of socially intelligent AI agents.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

📈

Can a Hallucinating Model help in Reducing Human Hallucination?

Sowmya S Sundaram, Balaji Alwar

YC

0

Reddit

0

The prevalence of unwarranted beliefs, spanning pseudoscience, logical fallacies, and conspiracy theories, presents substantial societal hurdles and the risk of disseminating misinformation. Utilizing established psychometric assessments, this study explores the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) vis-a-vis the average human in detecting prevalent logical pitfalls. We undertake a philosophical inquiry, juxtaposing the rationality of humans against that of LLMs. Furthermore, we propose methodologies for harnessing LLMs to counter misconceptions, drawing upon psychological models of persuasion such as cognitive dissonance theory and elaboration likelihood theory. Through this endeavor, we highlight the potential of LLMs as personalized misinformation debunking agents.

Read more

5/3/2024

Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View

Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View

Jintian Zhang, Xin Xu, Ningyu Zhang, Ruibo Liu, Bryan Hooi, Shumin Deng

YC

0

Reddit

0

As Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems are increasingly employed in intricate social environments, a pressing query emerges: Can these NLP systems mirror human-esque collaborative intelligence, in a multi-agent society consisting of multiple large language models (LLMs)? This paper probes the collaboration mechanisms among contemporary NLP systems by melding practical experiments with theoretical insights. We fabricate four unique `societies' comprised of LLM agents, where each agent is characterized by a specific `trait' (easy-going or overconfident) and engages in collaboration with a distinct `thinking pattern' (debate or reflection). Through evaluating these multi-agent societies on three benchmark datasets, we discern that certain collaborative strategies not only outshine previous top-tier approaches, but also optimize efficiency (using fewer API tokens). Moreover, our results further illustrate that LLM agents manifest human-like social behaviors, such as conformity and consensus reaching, mirroring foundational social psychology theories. In conclusion, we integrate insights from social psychology to contextualize the collaboration of LLM agents, inspiring further investigations into the collaboration mechanism for LLMs. We commit to sharing our code and datasetsfootnote{url{https://github.com/zjunlp/MachineSoM}.}, hoping to catalyze further research in this promising avenue.

Read more

5/28/2024

Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? The Misleading Success of Simulating Social Interactions With LLMs

Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? The Misleading Success of Simulating Social Interactions With LLMs

Xuhui Zhou, Zhe Su, Tiwalayo Eisape, Hyunwoo Kim, Maarten Sap

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent advances in large language models (LLM) have enabled richer social simulations, allowing for the study of various social phenomena. However, most recent work has used a more omniscient perspective on these simulations (e.g., single LLM to generate all interlocutors), which is fundamentally at odds with the non-omniscient, information asymmetric interactions that involve humans and AI agents in the real world. To examine these differences, we develop an evaluation framework to simulate social interactions with LLMs in various settings (omniscient, non-omniscient). Our experiments show that LLMs perform better in unrealistic, omniscient simulation settings but struggle in ones that more accurately reflect real-world conditions with information asymmetry. Our findings indicate that addressing information asymmetry remains a fundamental challenge for LLM-based agents.

Read more

4/22/2024

Small Agent Can Also Rock! Empowering Small Language Models as Hallucination Detector

Small Agent Can Also Rock! Empowering Small Language Models as Hallucination Detector

Xiaoxue Cheng, Junyi Li, Wayne Xin Zhao, Hongzhi Zhang, Fuzheng Zhang, Di Zhang, Kun Gai, Ji-Rong Wen

YC

0

Reddit

0

Hallucination detection is a challenging task for large language models (LLMs), and existing studies heavily rely on powerful closed-source LLMs such as GPT-4. In this paper, we propose an autonomous LLM-based agent framework, called HaluAgent, which enables relatively smaller LLMs (e.g. Baichuan2-Chat 7B) to actively select suitable tools for detecting multiple hallucination types such as text, code, and mathematical expression. In HaluAgent, we integrate the LLM, multi-functional toolbox, and design a fine-grained three-stage detection framework along with memory mechanism. To facilitate the effectiveness of HaluAgent, we leverage existing Chinese and English datasets to synthesize detection trajectories for fine-tuning, which endows HaluAgent with the capability for bilingual hallucination detection. Extensive experiments demonstrate that only using 2K samples for tuning LLMs, HaluAgent can perform hallucination detection on various types of tasks and datasets, achieving performance comparable to or even higher than GPT-4 without tool enhancements on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets. We release our dataset and code at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/HaluAgent.

Read more

6/18/2024