FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logic
2209.00840
1
0
šæ
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on a variety of natural language understanding tasks. However, existing benchmarks are inadequate in measuring the complex logical reasoning capabilities of a model. We present FOLIO, a human-annotated, logically complex and diverse dataset for reasoning in natural language (NL), equipped with first-order logic (FOL) annotations. FOLIO consists of 1,430 examples (unique conclusions), each paired with one of 487 sets of premises used to deductively reason for the validity of each conclusion. The logical correctness of the premises and conclusions is ensured by their FOL annotations, which are automatically verified by an FOL inference engine. In addition to the main NL reasoning task, NL-FOL pairs in FOLIO constitute a new NL-FOL translation dataset. Our experiments on FOLIO systematically evaluate the FOL reasoning ability of supervised fine-tuning on medium-sized language models. For both NL reasoning and NL-FOL translation, we benchmark multiple state-of-the-art language models. Our results show that a subset of FOLIO presents a challenge for one of the most capable {Large Language Model (LLM)} publicly available, GPT-4.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Researchers have developed a new dataset called FOLIO to assess the logical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
- FOLIO consists of 1,430 examples, each paired with a set of premises used to reason about the validity of the conclusion
- The premises and conclusions are annotated with first-order logic (FOL) to ensure logical correctness, which is automatically verified
- FOLIO also serves as a new dataset for translating natural language to first-order logic
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 have become remarkably good at understanding and generating human language. However, existing benchmarks may not adequately measure their ability to perform complex logical reasoning. To address this, researchers have created a new dataset called FOLIO (First-Order LOgic in Language) that focuses on testing the logical reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
FOLIO contains 1,430 unique conclusions, each paired with a set of premises that can be used to logically deduce the validity of the conclusion. The premises and conclusions are annotated using first-order logic (FOL), a formal language for representing logical statements. This ensures that the logical relationships between the premises and conclusions are well-defined and can be automatically verified by an FOL inference engine.
In addition to the main task of reasoning about the validity of the conclusions, FOLIO also serves as a new dataset for translating natural language into first-order logic. This can be valuable for building systems that can understand and reason about logical statements expressed in natural language.
Technical Explanation
The researchers created FOLIO to specifically evaluate the logical reasoning capabilities of LLMs. The dataset consists of 1,430 unique conclusions, each paired with one of 487 sets of premises. The premises and conclusions are annotated with first-order logic (FOL) expressions, which are automatically verified to ensure logical correctness.
To create FOLIO, the researchers first generated a large number of logically valid premises and conclusions using a combination of manual curation and automated generation. They then used crowd-sourcing to annotate the natural language premises and conclusions with their corresponding FOL expressions. The FOL annotations were verified using an FOL inference engine to ensure that the logical relationships were correctly represented.
The researchers benchmark the performance of several state-of-the-art language models, including GPT-4, on both the natural language reasoning task and the natural language to first-order logic translation task. Their results show that while the models perform well on some aspects of the tasks, a subset of the FOLIO dataset presents a significant challenge, even for the powerful GPT-4 model.
Critical Analysis
The FOLIO dataset represents an important step towards better evaluating the logical reasoning capabilities of large language models. By using formal logic annotations, the researchers have created a dataset that can rigorously test a model's ability to understand and reason about logical relationships, which is a crucial aspect of human intelligence that is not always well-captured by existing language understanding benchmarks.
However, the researchers acknowledge that FOLIO is just a first step and that further work is needed to fully assess the logical reasoning abilities of LLMs. For example, the dataset focuses on deductive reasoning, but real-world reasoning often involves other forms of logical inference, such as abductive or inductive reasoning. Expanding the dataset to cover a wider range of logical reasoning could provide a more comprehensive evaluation.
Additionally, the researchers note that the current dataset size may be too small to fully capture the breadth of logical reasoning skills that a model can possess. Increasing the scale and diversity of the dataset could lead to more nuanced and reliable assessments of a model's logical reasoning capabilities.
Conclusion
The FOLIO dataset represents an important step forward in evaluating the logical reasoning capabilities of large language models. By using formal logic annotations, the researchers have created a dataset that can rigorously test a model's ability to understand and reason about logical relationships, which is a crucial aspect of human intelligence.
While the current version of FOLIO presents a significant challenge for even the most capable language models, the researchers' work lays the foundation for further advancements in this area. Expanding the dataset and exploring other forms of logical reasoning could lead to a better understanding of the strengths and limitations of LLMs in logical reasoning, ultimately paving the way for the development of more intelligent and capable AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
šæ
NL2FOL: Translating Natural Language to First-Order Logic for Logical Fallacy Detection
Abhinav Lalwani, Lovish Chopra, Christopher Hahn, Caroline Trippel, Zhijing Jin, Mrinmaya Sachan
0
0
Logical fallacies are common errors in reasoning that undermine the logic of an argument. Automatically detecting logical fallacies has important applications in tracking misinformation and validating claims. In this paper, we design a process to reliably detect logical fallacies by translating natural language to First-order Logic (FOL) step-by-step using Large Language Models (LLMs). We then utilize Satisfiability Modulo Theory (SMT) solvers to reason about the validity of the formula and classify inputs as either a fallacy or valid statement. Our model also provides a novel means of utilizing LLMs to interpret the output of the SMT solver, offering insights into the counter-examples that illustrate why a given sentence is considered a logical fallacy. Our approach is robust, interpretable and does not require training data or fine-tuning. We evaluate our model on a mixed dataset of fallacies and valid sentences. The results demonstrate improved performance compared to end-to-end LLMs, with our classifier achieving an F1-score of 71% on the Logic dataset. The approach is able to generalize effectively, achieving an F1-score of 73% on the challenge set, LogicClimate, outperforming state-of-the-art models by 21% despite its much smaller size.
5/7/2024
LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models
Mihir Parmar, Nisarg Patel, Neeraj Varshney, Mutsumi Nakamura, Man Luo, Santosh Mashetty, Arindam Mitra, Chitta Baral
0
0
Recently developed large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform remarkably well on a wide range of language understanding tasks. But, can they really reason over the natural language? This question has been receiving significant research attention and many reasoning skills such as commonsense, numerical, and qualitative have been studied. However, the crucial skill pertaining to 'logical reasoning' has remained underexplored. Existing work investigating this reasoning ability of LLMs has focused only on a couple of inference rules (such as modus ponens and modus tollens) of propositional and first-order logic. Addressing the above limitation, we comprehensively evaluate the logical reasoning ability of LLMs on 25 different reasoning patterns spanning over propositional, first-order, and non-monotonic logics. To enable systematic evaluation, we introduce LogicBench, a natural language question-answering dataset focusing on the use of a single inference rule. We conduct detailed analysis with a range of LLMs such as GPT-4, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama-2, and Mistral using chain-of-thought prompting. Experimental results show that existing LLMs do not fare well on LogicBench; especially, they struggle with instances involving complex reasoning and negations. Furthermore, they sometimes overlook contextual information necessary for reasoning to arrive at the correct conclusion. We believe that our work and findings facilitate future research for evaluating and enhancing the logical reasoning ability of LLMs. Data and code are available at https://github.com/Mihir3009/LogicBench.
6/7/2024
š§Ŗ
Scaling Synthetic Logical Reasoning Datasets with Context-Sensitive Declarative Grammars
Damien Sileo
0
0
Logical reasoning remains a challenge for natural language processing, but it can be improved by training language models to mimic theorem provers on procedurally generated problems. Previous work used domain-specific proof generation algorithms, which biases reasoning toward specific proof traces and limits auditability and extensibility. We present a simpler and more general declarative framework with flexible context-sensitive rules binding multiple languages (specifically, simplified English and the TPTP theorem-proving language). We construct first-order logic problems by selecting up to 32 premises and one hypothesis. We demonstrate that using semantic constraints during generation and careful English verbalization of predicates enhances logical reasoning without hurting natural English tasks. We use relatively small DeBERTa-v3 models to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on the FOLIO human-authored logic dataset, surpassing GPT-4 in accuracy with or without an external solver by 12%.
6/18/2024
Reason from Fallacy: Enhancing Large Language Models' Logical Reasoning through Logical Fallacy Understanding
Yanda Li, Dixuan Wang, Jiaqing Liang, Guochao Jiang, Qianyu He, Yanghua Xiao, Deqing Yang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated good performance in many reasoning tasks, but they still struggle with some complicated reasoning tasks including logical reasoning. One non-negligible reason for LLMs' suboptimal performance on logical reasoning is their overlooking of understanding logical fallacies correctly. To evaluate LLMs' capability of logical fallacy understanding (LFU), we propose five concrete tasks from three cognitive dimensions of WHAT, WHY, and HOW in this paper. Towards these LFU tasks, we have successfully constructed a new dataset LFUD based on GPT-4 accompanied by a little human effort. Our extensive experiments justify that our LFUD can be used not only to evaluate LLMs' LFU capability, but also to fine-tune LLMs to obtain significantly enhanced performance on logical reasoning.
4/9/2024