From Cluster Assumption to Graph Convolution: Graph-based Semi-Supervised Learning Revisited
2309.13599
0
0
Abstract
Graph-based semi-supervised learning (GSSL) has long been a hot research topic. Traditional methods are generally shallow learners, based on the cluster assumption. Recently, graph convolutional networks (GCNs) have become the predominant techniques for their promising performance. In this paper, we theoretically discuss the relationship between these two types of methods in a unified optimization framework. One of the most intriguing findings is that, unlike traditional ones, typical GCNs may not jointly consider the graph structure and label information at each layer. Motivated by this, we further propose three simple but powerful graph convolution methods. The first is a supervised method OGC which guides the graph convolution process with labels. The others are two unsupervised methods: GGC and its multi-scale version GGCM, both aiming to preserve the graph structure information during the convolution process. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to show the effectiveness of our methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper revisits the graph-based semi-supervised learning (GSSL) approach, which leverages the cluster assumption and graph convolution to perform classification tasks.
- It provides a comprehensive analysis of the connection between the cluster assumption and graph convolution, offering insights into the effectiveness and limitations of GSSL methods.
- The paper explores various GSSL techniques, including Graph Convolutional Network (GCN), Cluster-based Graph Collaborative Filtering, and Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs), and discusses their strengths and weaknesses.
- Additionally, the paper delves into the Graph Contrastive Learning approach, which aims to learn meaningful representations of graph-structured data.
Plain English Explanation
This research paper examines a popular machine learning technique called graph-based semi-supervised learning (GSSL). GSSL is used to classify data by leveraging the connections, or "graph," between different data points.
The key idea behind GSSL is the "cluster assumption," which suggests that data points that are close to each other in the graph are likely to have the same classification. For example, if you have a social network graph, the cluster assumption says that people who are connected are more likely to share similar interests or characteristics.
The paper looks at how GSSL methods, such as Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), Cluster-based Graph Collaborative Filtering, and Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs), use the cluster assumption to make predictions. It also discusses a newer approach called Graph Contrastive Learning, which tries to learn good representations of the graph structure itself.
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of these different GSSL techniques, helping researchers and practitioners better understand when and how to apply them in real-world problems.
Technical Explanation
The paper starts by introducing the concept of graph-based semi-supervised learning (GSSL). GSSL is a machine learning approach that leverages the connections between data points, represented as a graph, to perform classification tasks. The key assumption underlying GSSL is the cluster assumption, which states that data points that are close to each other in the graph are likely to have the same class labels.
The paper then delves into various GSSL techniques, including:
-
Graph Convolutional Network (GCN): GCNs are a class of neural networks that can operate directly on graph-structured data. They use a graph convolution operation to aggregate information from a node's neighbors, effectively propagating label information through the graph.
-
Cluster-based Graph Collaborative Filtering: This approach first clusters the graph into different communities and then performs collaborative filtering within each cluster, leveraging the cluster assumption to make more accurate predictions.
-
Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs): GCNNs are a variant of GCNs that can handle probabilistic graphs, where the edges have associated probabilities. This allows the model to capture the uncertainty in the graph structure.
The paper also discusses the Graph Contrastive Learning approach, which aims to learn meaningful representations of the graph structure itself. This is in contrast to traditional GSSL methods, which focus on leveraging the graph structure for classification tasks.
Throughout the paper, the authors provide a comprehensive analysis of the strengths and limitations of these different GSSL techniques, highlighting their effectiveness, as well as potential issues and areas for further research.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough analysis of the connection between the cluster assumption and graph convolution, which is the foundation of many GSSL methods. This analysis offers valuable insights into the effectiveness and limitations of these approaches.
One potential limitation discussed in the paper is the sensitivity of GSSL methods to the quality of the graph structure. If the graph does not accurately capture the underlying relationships between data points, the performance of GSSL techniques can be severely impacted. Additionally, the paper notes that the cluster assumption may not always hold true, particularly in complex real-world datasets, which could limit the applicability of GSSL methods in certain scenarios.
The paper also highlights the potential benefits of the Graph Contrastive Learning approach, which aims to learn more generalizable representations of the graph structure. This could be a promising direction for future research, as it may help address some of the limitations of traditional GSSL methods.
While the paper provides a comprehensive technical explanation of the various GSSL techniques, it would be helpful to see more discussion on the practical implications and potential use cases of these methods. Additionally, a deeper exploration of the computational complexity and scalability of the different approaches could further enhance the value of this research for practitioners.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive review of the graph-based semi-supervised learning (GSSL) approach, which leverages the cluster assumption and graph convolution to perform classification tasks. The authors provide a detailed analysis of the connection between the cluster assumption and graph convolution, offering valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of various GSSL techniques, such as Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), Cluster-based Graph Collaborative Filtering, and Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs).
The paper also discusses the Graph Contrastive Learning approach, which aims to learn meaningful representations of the graph structure itself. This research offers a deeper understanding of the GSSL framework and its potential applications, while also highlighting areas for future exploration, such as addressing the sensitivity of GSSL methods to the quality of the graph structure and exploring more generalized graph representation learning techniques.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
Graph Learning Dual Graph Convolutional Network For Semi-Supervised Node Classification With Subgraph Sketch
Zibin Huang, Jun Xian
0
0
In this paper, we propose the Graph-Learning-Dual Graph Convolutional Neural Network called GLDGCN based on the classic Graph Convolutional Neural Network(GCN) by introducing dual convolutional layer and graph learning layer. We apply GLDGCN to the semi-supervised node classification task. Compared with the baseline methods, we achieve higher classification accuracy on three citation networks Citeseer, Cora and Pubmed, and we also analyze and discussabout selection of the hyperparameters and network depth. GLDGCN also perform well on the classic social network KarateClub and the new Wiki-CS dataset. For the insufficient ability of our algorithm to process large graphs during the experiment, we also introduce subgraph clustering and stochastic gradient descent methods into GCN and design a semi-supervised node classification algorithm based on the CLustering Graph Convolutional neural Network, which enables GCN to process large graph and improves its application value. We complete semi-supervised node classification experiments on two classic large graph which are PPI dataset (more than 50,000 nodes) and Reddit dataset (more than 200,000 nodes), and also perform well.
4/26/2024
Cluster-based Graph Collaborative Filtering
Fan Liu, Shuai Zhao, Zhiyong Cheng, Liqiang Nie, Mohan Kankanhalli
0
0
Graph Convolution Networks (GCNs) have significantly succeeded in learning user and item representations for recommendation systems. The core of their efficacy is the ability to explicitly exploit the collaborative signals from both the first- and high-order neighboring nodes. However, most existing GCN-based methods overlook the multiple interests of users while performing high-order graph convolution. Thus, the noisy information from unreliable neighbor nodes (e.g., users with dissimilar interests) negatively impacts the representation learning of the target node. Additionally, conducting graph convolution operations without differentiating high-order neighbors suffers the over-smoothing issue when stacking more layers, resulting in performance degradation. In this paper, we aim to capture more valuable information from high-order neighboring nodes while avoiding noise for better representation learning of the target node. To achieve this goal, we propose a novel GCN-based recommendation model, termed Cluster-based Graph Collaborative Filtering (ClusterGCF). This model performs high-order graph convolution on cluster-specific graphs, which are constructed by capturing the multiple interests of users and identifying the common interests among them. Specifically, we design an unsupervised and optimizable soft node clustering approach to classify user and item nodes into multiple clusters. Based on the soft node clustering results and the topology of the user-item interaction graph, we assign the nodes with probabilities for different clusters to construct the cluster-specific graphs. To evaluate the effectiveness of ClusterGCF, we conducted extensive experiments on four publicly available datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that our model can significantly improve recommendation performance.
4/17/2024
🧠
Graph Convolutional Neural Networks Sensitivity under Probabilistic Error Model
Xinjue Wang, Esa Ollila, Sergiy A. Vorobyov
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), particularly Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs), have emerged as pivotal instruments in machine learning and signal processing for processing graph-structured data. This paper proposes an analysis framework to investigate the sensitivity of GCNNs to probabilistic graph perturbations, directly impacting the graph shift operator (GSO). Our study establishes tight expected GSO error bounds, which are explicitly linked to the error model parameters, and reveals a linear relationship between GSO perturbations and the resulting output differences at each layer of GCNNs. This linearity demonstrates that a single-layer GCNN maintains stability under graph edge perturbations, provided that the GSO errors remain bounded, regardless of the perturbation scale. For multilayer GCNNs, the dependency of system's output difference on GSO perturbations is shown to be a recursion of linearity. Finally, we exemplify the framework with the Graph Isomorphism Network (GIN) and Simple Graph Convolution Network (SGCN). Experiments validate our theoretical derivations and the effectiveness of our approach.
5/7/2024
➖
Towards Graph Contrastive Learning: A Survey and Beyond
Wei Ju, Yifan Wang, Yifang Qin, Zhengyang Mao, Zhiping Xiao, Junyu Luo, Junwei Yang, Yiyang Gu, Dongjie Wang, Qingqing Long, Siyu Yi, Xiao Luo, Ming Zhang
0
0
In recent years, deep learning on graphs has achieved remarkable success in various domains. However, the reliance on annotated graph data remains a significant bottleneck due to its prohibitive cost and time-intensive nature. To address this challenge, self-supervised learning (SSL) on graphs has gained increasing attention and has made significant progress. SSL enables machine learning models to produce informative representations from unlabeled graph data, reducing the reliance on expensive labeled data. While SSL on graphs has witnessed widespread adoption, one critical component, Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL), has not been thoroughly investigated in the existing literature. Thus, this survey aims to fill this gap by offering a dedicated survey on GCL. We provide a comprehensive overview of the fundamental principles of GCL, including data augmentation strategies, contrastive modes, and contrastive optimization objectives. Furthermore, we explore the extensions of GCL to other aspects of data-efficient graph learning, such as weakly supervised learning, transfer learning, and related scenarios. We also discuss practical applications spanning domains such as drug discovery, genomics analysis, recommender systems, and finally outline the challenges and potential future directions in this field.
5/21/2024