Harnessing the Power of Vicinity-Informed Analysis for Classification under Covariate Shift

2405.16906

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/28/2024 by Mitsuhiro Fujikawa, Yohei Akimoto, Jun Sakuma, Kazuto Fukuchi

🏷️

Abstract

Transfer learning enhances prediction accuracy on a target distribution by leveraging data from a source distribution, demonstrating significant benefits in various applications. This paper introduces a novel dissimilarity measure that utilizes vicinity information, i.e., the local structure of data points, to analyze the excess error in classification under covariate shift, a transfer learning setting where marginal feature distributions differ but conditional label distributions remain the same. We characterize the excess error using the proposed measure and demonstrate faster or competitive convergence rates compared to previous techniques. Notably, our approach is effective in situations where the non-absolute continuousness assumption, which often appears in real-world applications, holds. Our theoretical analysis bridges the gap between current theoretical findings and empirical observations in transfer learning, particularly in scenarios with significant differences between source and target distributions.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores techniques for improving the robustness and fairness of machine learning models when dealing with distribution shifts in the data.
  • The authors propose several approaches, including quantifying uncertainty, training conditional coverage bounds, and self-organizing clustering systems to handle different types of covariate shifts.
  • The research aims to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of AI systems, particularly in real-world applications where data distributions can change over time.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses ways to make machine learning models more reliable and fair when the data they are trained on changes over time. This is a common problem, as the real world is constantly changing, and the data used to train AI systems may not always match the data encountered in the field.

The researchers suggest several techniques to address this challenge. One approach is to quantify the uncertainty in the model's predictions, so the system can recognize when it is less confident and may need to be updated or adjusted. Another method is to train the model to provide conditional coverage bounds, which means the model can estimate the range of possible outcomes, rather than just providing a single prediction.

The researchers also propose a self-organizing clustering system that can automatically detect changes in the data distribution and adapt the model accordingly, without the need for human intervention. This could be useful in real-world applications where the data is constantly evolving.

Additionally, the paper explores techniques for ensuring algorithmic fairness when the data used to train the model changes. This is crucial for building AI systems that treat all individuals and groups fairly, regardless of changes in the underlying data.

Overall, this research aims to make AI systems more robust, reliable, and fair in the face of shifting data distributions, which is a crucial challenge for the widespread adoption and responsible use of machine learning technology.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents several approaches for enhancing the robustness and fairness of machine learning models when dealing with distribution shifts in the data.

One key contribution is the quantification of distribution shifts and associated uncertainties. The authors propose a method to measure the distance between the training and testing data distributions, and then use this information to calibrate the model's predictive uncertainty. This allows the model to recognize when it is less confident in its predictions, which can be important for real-world deployment.

The paper also introduces a framework for training conditional coverage bounds. Instead of producing a single point prediction, the model learns to estimate a range of possible outcomes, along with the probability that the true value will fall within that range. This can help quantify the inherent uncertainty in the model's outputs.

Additionally, the researchers present a self-organizing clustering system that can automatically detect changes in the data distribution and adapt the model accordingly. This unsupervised approach allows the system to stay up-to-date without the need for constant human monitoring and retraining.

The paper also explores techniques for ensuring algorithmic fairness under covariate shift conditions. The authors propose methods to maintain fairness guarantees even as the underlying data distribution changes, which is crucial for deploying fair and equitable AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The research presented in this paper addresses important challenges in the field of machine learning, particularly the need for robust and fair models that can adapt to changing data distributions.

One potential limitation is the reliance on specific assumptions about the nature of the distribution shifts, such as the ability to measure the distance between training and testing data. In real-world scenarios, the shifts may be more complex and harder to quantify, which could limit the applicability of the proposed methods.

Additionally, while the self-organizing clustering system is an interesting approach, its performance and scalability in large-scale, high-dimensional datasets may need further investigation. The paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the computational and memory requirements of this approach.

The algorithmic fairness techniques presented in the paper are an important contribution, but their effectiveness may depend on the specific fairness definitions and constraints used. The paper does not explore the trade-offs between different fairness criteria or the potential for fairness-accuracy trade-offs.

Overall, the research presented in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of robust and fair machine learning. However, as with any research, further validation, testing, and refinement may be necessary to ensure the practical applicability and scalability of the proposed techniques in real-world scenarios.

Conclusion

This research paper explores innovative approaches for improving the robustness and fairness of machine learning models when dealing with distribution shifts in the data. The key contributions include techniques for quantifying uncertainty, training conditional coverage bounds, and developing self-organizing clustering systems to adapt to changing data distributions.

These methods aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of AI systems, particularly in real-world applications where the data is constantly evolving. By addressing the challenges of distribution shifts and algorithmic fairness, the researchers are paving the way for more robust, adaptable, and equitable machine learning solutions that can be deployed with confidence in a wide range of domains.

The proposed techniques represent an important step forward in the ongoing quest to develop AI systems that are not only highly accurate, but also transparent, accountable, and fair, even as the world around them changes. As the field of machine learning continues to advance, this research highlights the critical importance of designing models that can adapt and evolve alongside the data they are trained on.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🔄

An adaptive transfer learning perspective on classification in non-stationary environments

Henry W J Reeve

YC

0

Reddit

0

We consider a semi-supervised classification problem with non-stationary label-shift in which we observe a labelled data set followed by a sequence of unlabelled covariate vectors in which the marginal probabilities of the class labels may change over time. Our objective is to predict the corresponding class-label for each covariate vector, without ever observing the ground-truth labels, beyond the initial labelled data set. Previous work has demonstrated the potential of sophisticated variants of online gradient descent to perform competitively with the optimal dynamic strategy (Bai et al. 2022). In this work we explore an alternative approach grounded in statistical methods for adaptive transfer learning. We demonstrate the merits of this alternative methodology by establishing a high-probability regret bound on the test error at any given individual test-time, which adapt automatically to the unknown dynamics of the marginal label probabilities. Further more, we give bounds on the average dynamic regret which match the average guarantees of the online learning perspective for any given time interval.

Read more

5/29/2024

Quantifying Distribution Shifts and Uncertainties for Enhanced Model Robustness in Machine Learning Applications

Quantifying Distribution Shifts and Uncertainties for Enhanced Model Robustness in Machine Learning Applications

Vegard Flovik

YC

0

Reddit

0

Distribution shifts, where statistical properties differ between training and test datasets, present a significant challenge in real-world machine learning applications where they directly impact model generalization and robustness. In this study, we explore model adaptation and generalization by utilizing synthetic data to systematically address distributional disparities. Our investigation aims to identify the prerequisites for successful model adaptation across diverse data distributions, while quantifying the associated uncertainties. Specifically, we generate synthetic data using the Van der Waals equation for gases and employ quantitative measures such as Kullback-Leibler divergence, Jensen-Shannon distance, and Mahalanobis distance to assess data similarity. These metrics en able us to evaluate both model accuracy and quantify the associated uncertainty in predictions arising from data distribution shifts. Our findings suggest that utilizing statistical measures, such as the Mahalanobis distance, to determine whether model predictions fall within the low-error interpolation regime or the high-error extrapolation regime provides a complementary method for assessing distribution shift and model uncertainty. These insights hold significant value for enhancing model robustness and generalization, essential for the successful deployment of machine learning applications in real-world scenarios.

Read more

5/6/2024

Beyond Discrepancy: A Closer Look at the Theory of Distribution Shift

Beyond Discrepancy: A Closer Look at the Theory of Distribution Shift

Robi Bhattacharjee, Nick Rittler, Kamalika Chaudhuri

YC

0

Reddit

0

Many machine learning models appear to deploy effortlessly under distribution shift, and perform well on a target distribution that is considerably different from the training distribution. Yet, learning theory of distribution shift bounds performance on the target distribution as a function of the discrepancy between the source and target, rarely guaranteeing high target accuracy. Motivated by this gap, this work takes a closer look at the theory of distribution shift for a classifier from a source to a target distribution. Instead of relying on the discrepancy, we adopt an Invariant-Risk-Minimization (IRM)-like assumption connecting the distributions, and characterize conditions under which data from a source distribution is sufficient for accurate classification of the target. When these conditions are not met, we show when only unlabeled data from the target is sufficient, and when labeled target data is needed. In all cases, we provide rigorous theoretical guarantees in the large sample regime.

Read more

5/30/2024

Assessing Model Generalization in Vicinity

Assessing Model Generalization in Vicinity

Yuchi Liu, Yifan Sun, Jingdong Wang, Liang Zheng

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper evaluates the generalization ability of classification models on out-of-distribution test sets without depending on ground truth labels. Common approaches often calculate an unsupervised metric related to a specific model property, like confidence or invariance, which correlates with out-of-distribution accuracy. However, these metrics are typically computed for each test sample individually, leading to potential issues caused by spurious model responses, such as overly high or low confidence. To tackle this challenge, we propose incorporating responses from neighboring test samples into the correctness assessment of each individual sample. In essence, if a model consistently demonstrates high correctness scores for nearby samples, it increases the likelihood of correctly predicting the target sample, and vice versa. The resulting scores are then averaged across all test samples to provide a holistic indication of model accuracy. Developed under the vicinal risk formulation, this approach, named vicinal risk proxy (VRP), computes accuracy without relying on labels. We show that applying the VRP method to existing generalization indicators, such as average confidence and effective invariance, consistently improves over these baselines both methodologically and experimentally. This yields a stronger correlation with model accuracy, especially on challenging out-of-distribution test sets.

Read more

6/14/2024