Interpretable Decision Tree Search as a Markov Decision Process
2309.12701
0
0
🛸
Abstract
Finding an optimal decision tree for a supervised learning task is a challenging combinatorial problem to solve at scale. It was recently proposed to frame the problem as a Markov Decision Problem (MDP) and use deep reinforcement learning to tackle scaling. Unfortunately, these methods are not competitive with the current branch-and-bound state-of-the-art. We propose instead to scale the resolution of such MDPs using an information-theoretic tests generating function that heuristically, and dynamically for every state, limits the set of admissible test actions to a few good candidates. As a solver, we show empirically that our algorithm is at the very least competitive with branch-and-bound alternatives. As a machine learning tool, a key advantage of our approach is to solve for multiple complexity-performance trade-offs at virtually no additional cost. With such a set of solutions, a user can then select the tree that generalizes best and which has the interpretability level that best suits their needs, which no current branch-and-bound method allows.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Developing an optimal decision tree for supervised learning is a challenging combinatorial problem that is difficult to solve at scale.
- Recently, researchers proposed framing the problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and using deep reinforcement learning to tackle scaling.
- However, these methods are not as competitive as the current branch-and-bound state-of-the-art.
- The paper proposes an alternative approach to scale the resolution of such MDPs using an information-theoretic test generating function.
- This heuristically and dynamically limits the set of admissible test actions for every state to a few good candidates.
- The authors show their algorithm is at least competitive with branch-and-bound alternatives.
- A key advantage is the ability to solve for multiple complexity-performance trade-offs at virtually no additional cost, allowing users to select the most appropriate decision tree.
Plain English Explanation
Finding the best decision tree for a machine learning task is a difficult problem, especially as the size and complexity of the data increases. Researchers have recently tried to frame this as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and use deep reinforcement learning to solve it. However, these new methods have not been as effective as the current best approach, called branch-and-bound.
In this paper, the authors propose a different way to tackle this problem. Instead of using reinforcement learning, they use an information-theoretic technique to heuristically and dynamically limit the number of potential decision tests that need to be considered at each step. This makes the optimization problem more manageable, while still finding a high-quality decision tree.
The key advantage of this approach is that it can generate multiple decision trees with different levels of complexity and performance. This gives the user more flexibility to choose the tree that best fits their needs, whether that's maximizing accuracy or maintaining interpretability. Current branch-and-bound methods don't provide this type of trade-off analysis.
Technical Explanation
The authors frame the problem of finding an optimal decision tree as a Markov Decision Process (MDP). However, they note that previous attempts to solve this MDP using deep reinforcement learning have not been competitive with the current state-of-the-art branch-and-bound methods.
To address this, the authors propose a new approach that uses an information-theoretic test generating function to heuristically and dynamically limit the set of admissible test actions for each state in the MDP. This helps scale the resolution of the MDP and makes the optimization problem more tractable.
The authors show empirically that their algorithm is at least competitive with branch-and-bound alternatives. A key advantage is that it can solve for multiple complexity-performance trade-offs at virtually no additional cost. This allows users to select the decision tree that generalizes best and has the appropriate level of interpretability, which is not possible with current branch-and-bound methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel approach to scaling the resolution of decision tree optimization MDPs, which is a significant challenge in the field. The use of an information-theoretic test generating function to dynamically limit the action space is an interesting and promising idea.
However, the authors acknowledge that their method is only "at the very least competitive" with branch-and-bound alternatives. This suggests there may still be room for improvement in terms of outperforming the current state-of-the-art. Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed comparison of the computational efficiency or runtime of their algorithm compared to branch-and-bound.
It would also be valuable to see the algorithm tested on a wider range of datasets and problem settings to better understand its strengths, weaknesses, and generalizable performance. The authors mention the ability to solve for multiple complexity-performance trade-offs, but do not provide a thorough analysis of this capability and its implications.
Overall, the research presented in the paper is a meaningful contribution to the challenge of learning accurate and interpretable decision trees. Further development and testing of the proposed approach could lead to significant advancements in the field.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a novel approach to the challenging problem of finding an optimal decision tree for supervised learning tasks. By framing the problem as a Markov Decision Process and using an information-theoretic test generating function to scale the resolution, the authors have developed an algorithm that is competitive with the current branch-and-bound state-of-the-art.
A key advantage of this method is its ability to efficiently generate a set of decision trees with different complexity-performance trade-offs. This gives users the flexibility to choose the tree that best suits their needs, whether that's maximizing accuracy or maintaining interpretability.
While the paper does not definitively outperform branch-and-bound, it represents an important step forward in addressing the scalability challenges of decision tree optimization. Further research and refinement of this approach could lead to significant breakthroughs in the field of fast and efficient decision tree learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
Transition Constrained Bayesian Optimization via Markov Decision Processes
Jose Pablo Folch, Calvin Tsay, Robert M Lee, Behrang Shafei, Weronika Ormaniec, Andreas Krause, Mark van der Wilk, Ruth Misener, Mojm'ir Mutn'y
0
0
Bayesian optimization is a methodology to optimize black-box functions. Traditionally, it focuses on the setting where you can arbitrarily query the search space. However, many real-life problems do not offer this flexibility; in particular, the search space of the next query may depend on previous ones. Example challenges arise in the physical sciences in the form of local movement constraints, required monotonicity in certain variables, and transitions influencing the accuracy of measurements. Altogether, such transition constraints necessitate a form of planning. This work extends classical Bayesian optimization via the framework of Markov Decision Processes. We iteratively solve a tractable linearization of our utility function using reinforcement learning to obtain a policy that plans ahead for the entire horizon. This is a parallel to the optimization of an acquisition function in policy space. The resulting policy is potentially history-dependent and non-Markovian. We showcase applications in chemical reactor optimization, informative path planning, machine calibration, and other synthetic examples.
5/30/2024
Online Learning of Decision Trees with Thompson Sampling
Ayman Chaouki, Jesse Read, Albert Bifet
0
0
Decision Trees are prominent prediction models for interpretable Machine Learning. They have been thoroughly researched, mostly in the batch setting with a fixed labelled dataset, leading to popular algorithms such as C4.5, ID3 and CART. Unfortunately, these methods are of heuristic nature, they rely on greedy splits offering no guarantees of global optimality and often leading to unnecessarily complex and hard-to-interpret Decision Trees. Recent breakthroughs addressed this suboptimality issue in the batch setting, but no such work has considered the online setting with data arriving in a stream. To this end, we devise a new Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm, Thompson Sampling Decision Trees (TSDT), able to produce optimal Decision Trees in an online setting. We analyse our algorithm and prove its almost sure convergence to the optimal tree. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments to validate our findings empirically. The proposed TSDT outperforms existing algorithms on several benchmarks, all while presenting the practical advantage of being tailored to the online setting.
4/10/2024
📈
Policy Trees for Prediction: Interpretable and Adaptive Model Selection for Machine Learning
Dimitris Bertsimas, Matthew Peroni
0
0
As a multitude of capable machine learning (ML) models become widely available in forms such as open-source software and public APIs, central questions remain regarding their use in real-world applications, especially in high-stakes decision-making. Is there always one best model that should be used? When are the models likely to be error-prone? Should a black-box or interpretable model be used? In this work, we develop a prescriptive methodology to address these key questions, introducing a tree-based approach, Optimal Predictive-Policy Trees (OP2T), that yields interpretable policies for adaptively selecting a predictive model or ensemble, along with a parameterized option to reject making a prediction. We base our methods on learning globally optimized prescriptive trees. Our approach enables interpretable and adaptive model selection and rejection while only assuming access to model outputs. By learning policies over different feature spaces, including the model outputs, our approach works with both structured and unstructured datasets. We evaluate our approach on real-world datasets, including regression and classification tasks with both structured and unstructured data. We demonstrate that our approach provides both strong performance against baseline methods while yielding insights that help answer critical questions about which models to use, and when.
6/3/2024
🎲
Monte Carlo Planning for Stochastic Control on Constrained Markov Decision Processes
Larkin Liu, Shiqi Liu, Matej Jusup
0
0
In the world of stochastic control, especially in economics and engineering, Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) can effectively model various stochastic decision processes, from asset management to transportation optimization. These underlying MDPs, upon closer examination, often reveal a specifically constrained causal structure concerning the transition and reward dynamics. By exploiting this structure, we can obtain a reduction in the causal representation of the problem setting, allowing us to solve of the optimal value function more efficiently. This work defines an MDP framework, the texttt{SD-MDP}, where we disentangle the causal structure of MDPs' transition and reward dynamics, providing distinct partitions on the temporal causal graph. With this stochastic reduction, the texttt{SD-MDP} reflects a general class of resource allocation problems. This disentanglement further enables us to derive theoretical guarantees on the estimation error of the value function under an optimal policy by allowing independent value estimation from Monte Carlo sampling. Subsequently, by integrating this estimator into well-known Monte Carlo planning algorithms, such as Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), we derive bounds on the simple regret of the algorithm. Finally, we quantify the policy improvement of MCTS under the texttt{SD-MDP} framework by demonstrating that the MCTS planning algorithm achieves higher expected reward (lower costs) under a constant simulation budget, on a tangible economic example based on maritime refuelling.
6/26/2024