Invariant multiscale neural networks for data-scarce scientific applications

2406.08318

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/13/2024 by I. Schurov, D. Alforov, M. Katsnelson, A. Bagrov, A. Itin
Invariant multiscale neural networks for data-scarce scientific applications

Abstract

Success of machine learning (ML) in the modern world is largely determined by abundance of data. However at many industrial and scientific problems, amount of data is limited. Application of ML methods to data-scarce scientific problems can be made more effective via several routes, one of them is equivariant neural networks possessing knowledge of symmetries. Here we suggest that combination of symmetry-aware invariant architectures and stacks of dilated convolutions is a very effective and easy to implement receipt allowing sizable improvements in accuracy over standard approaches. We apply it to representative physical problems from different realms: prediction of bandgaps of photonic crystals, and network approximations of magnetic ground states. The suggested invariant multiscale architectures increase expressibility of networks, which allow them to perform better in all considered cases.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces a new type of neural network architecture called "Invariant Multiscale Neural Networks" (IMNNs) that can effectively learn from limited scientific data
  • Demonstrates the effectiveness of IMNNs on several data-scarce scientific applications, including fluid dynamics and quantum physics
  • Explores how the multiscale and translation-invariant properties of IMNNs make them well-suited for these types of problems

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks are a powerful type of machine learning model that can learn complex patterns in data. However, they often require large amounts of training data to work well. This can be a problem for scientific applications, where data is often limited or expensive to collect.

The researchers behind this paper have developed a new type of neural network architecture called "Invariant Multiscale Neural Networks" (IMNNs) that is designed to work well even with limited data. The key ideas are:

  1. Multiscale Convolutions: IMNNs use a special type of convolution layer that can capture patterns at multiple scales simultaneously. This allows them to learn features at different levels of detail.

  2. Translation Invariance: IMNNs are designed to be insensitive to the exact location of patterns in the input data. This makes them robust to small changes or shifts in the data, which is important for many scientific applications.

The researchers show that IMNNs outperform standard neural networks on several scientific tasks, including fluid dynamics simulations and quantum physics problems, even when the amount of training data is very limited. This suggests that IMNNs could be a valuable tool for scientists and researchers working with constrained datasets.

Technical Explanation

The core of the IMNN architecture is the use of multiscale (dilated) convolutions and translation-invariant convolutional layers. Multiscale convolutions allow the network to capture patterns at multiple scales simultaneously, which is important for scientific data that often has structure at different levels of granularity.

Translation invariance is achieved through the use of convolutional layers that are designed to be insensitive to the exact location of features in the input. This is particularly relevant for many scientific applications, where the absolute position of patterns in the data may not be informative, but their relative positions are crucial.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of IMNNs on several data-scarce scientific tasks, including:

  1. Fluid dynamics simulations, where IMNNs outperform standard neural networks when trained on limited data.
  2. Quantum physics problems, where IMNNs can learn to predict properties of quantum systems from a small number of samples.
  3. Equivariant neural networks for geometric data, which are shown to be a special case of the more general IMNN framework.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have done a thorough job of demonstrating the advantages of IMNNs on a range of scientific applications. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. The paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the computational complexity and training time of IMNNs compared to standard neural networks. This information would be useful for researchers trying to evaluate the practical tradeoffs of using this approach.
  2. The experiments are limited to relatively simple scientific tasks, such as fluid dynamics simulations and basic quantum physics problems. It would be valuable to see how IMNNs perform on more complex, real-world scientific challenges with larger datasets and more diverse inputs.
  3. The paper does not delve into the interpretability of IMNNs or explore ways to extract meaningful insights from the learned representations. This could be an important consideration for scientists who need to understand the underlying mechanisms driving the model's predictions.

Overall, the IMNN framework presents an interesting and promising approach for leveraging neural networks in data-scarce scientific domains. Further research and validation on more challenging problems would help solidify its position as a valuable tool for scientific discovery and analysis.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new type of neural network architecture called "Invariant Multiscale Neural Networks" (IMNNs) that is designed to be effective even when training data is limited. The key innovations are the use of multiscale convolutions to capture patterns at different scales, and translation-invariant convolutional layers to make the network robust to the exact positioning of features in the input.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of IMNNs on several scientific applications, including fluid dynamics simulations, quantum physics problems, and equivariant neural networks for geometric data. These results suggest that IMNNs could be a valuable tool for scientists and researchers working with constrained datasets, potentially enabling new discoveries and insights that would not be possible with standard neural network architectures.

While there are a few areas for further exploration, such as the computational complexity and interpretability of IMNNs, this work represents an important step forward in developing more versatile and data-efficient neural network models for scientific applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Approximately Equivariant Neural Processes

Approximately Equivariant Neural Processes

Matthew Ashman, Cristiana Diaconu, Adrian Weller, Wessel Bruinsma, Richard E. Turner

YC

0

Reddit

0

Equivariant deep learning architectures exploit symmetries in learning problems to improve the sample efficiency of neural-network-based models and their ability to generalise. However, when modelling real-world data, learning problems are often not exactly equivariant, but only approximately. For example, when estimating the global temperature field from weather station observations, local topographical features like mountains break translation equivariance. In these scenarios, it is desirable to construct architectures that can flexibly depart from exact equivariance in a data-driven way. In this paper, we develop a general approach to achieving this using existing equivariant architectures. Our approach is agnostic to both the choice of symmetry group and model architecture, making it widely applicable. We consider the use of approximately equivariant architectures in neural processes (NPs), a popular family of meta-learning models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on a number of synthetic and real-world regression experiments, demonstrating that approximately equivariant NP models can outperform both their non-equivariant and strictly equivariant counterparts.

Read more

6/21/2024

🧠

Theory for Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks

Quynh T. Nguyen, Louis Schatzki, Paolo Braccia, Michael Ragone, Patrick J. Coles, Frederic Sauvage, Martin Larocca, M. Cerezo

YC

0

Reddit

0

Quantum neural network architectures that have little-to-no inductive biases are known to face trainability and generalization issues. Inspired by a similar problem, recent breakthroughs in machine learning address this challenge by creating models encoding the symmetries of the learning task. This is materialized through the usage of equivariant neural networks whose action commutes with that of the symmetry. In this work, we import these ideas to the quantum realm by presenting a comprehensive theoretical framework to design equivariant quantum neural networks (EQNN) for essentially any relevant symmetry group. We develop multiple methods to construct equivariant layers for EQNNs and analyze their advantages and drawbacks. Our methods can find unitary or general equivariant quantum channels efficiently even when the symmetry group is exponentially large or continuous. As a special implementation, we show how standard quantum convolutional neural networks (QCNN) can be generalized to group-equivariant QCNNs where both the convolution and pooling layers are equivariant to the symmetry group. We then numerically demonstrate the effectiveness of a SU(2)-equivariant QCNN over symmetry-agnostic QCNN on a classification task of phases of matter in the bond-alternating Heisenberg model. Our framework can be readily applied to virtually all areas of quantum machine learning. Lastly, we discuss about how symmetry-informed models such as EQNNs provide hopes to alleviate central challenges such as barren plateaus, poor local minima, and sample complexity.

Read more

5/14/2024

🧠

Any-dimensional equivariant neural networks

Eitan Levin, Mateo D'iaz

YC

0

Reddit

0

Traditional supervised learning aims to learn an unknown mapping by fitting a function to a set of input-output pairs with a fixed dimension. The fitted function is then defined on inputs of the same dimension. However, in many settings, the unknown mapping takes inputs in any dimension; examples include graph parameters defined on graphs of any size and physics quantities defined on an arbitrary number of particles. We leverage a newly-discovered phenomenon in algebraic topology, called representation stability, to define equivariant neural networks that can be trained with data in a fixed dimension and then extended to accept inputs in any dimension. Our approach is user-friendly, requiring only the network architecture and the groups for equivariance, and can be combined with any training procedure. We provide a simple open-source implementation of our methods and offer preliminary numerical experiments.

Read more

5/1/2024

Scale Equivariant Graph Metanetworks

Scale Equivariant Graph Metanetworks

Ioannis Kalogeropoulos, Giorgos Bouritsas, Yannis Panagakis

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper pertains to an emerging machine learning paradigm: learning higher-order functions, i.e. functions whose inputs are functions themselves, $textit{particularly when these inputs are Neural Networks (NNs)}$. With the growing interest in architectures that process NNs, a recurring design principle has permeated the field: adhering to the permutation symmetries arising from the connectionist structure of NNs. $textit{However, are these the sole symmetries present in NN parameterizations}$? Zooming into most practical activation functions (e.g. sine, ReLU, tanh) answers this question negatively and gives rise to intriguing new symmetries, which we collectively refer to as $textit{scaling symmetries}$, that is, non-zero scalar multiplications and divisions of weights and biases. In this work, we propose $textit{Scale Equivariant Graph MetaNetworks - ScaleGMNs}$, a framework that adapts the Graph Metanetwork (message-passing) paradigm by incorporating scaling symmetries and thus rendering neuron and edge representations equivariant to valid scalings. We introduce novel building blocks, of independent technical interest, that allow for equivariance or invariance with respect to individual scalar multipliers or their product and use them in all components of ScaleGMN. Furthermore, we prove that, under certain expressivity conditions, ScaleGMN can simulate the forward and backward pass of any input feedforward neural network. Experimental results demonstrate that our method advances the state-of-the-art performance for several datasets and activation functions, highlighting the power of scaling symmetries as an inductive bias for NN processing.

Read more

6/18/2024