Large Human Language Models: A Need and the Challenges

Overview

• As natural language processing (NLP) systems become more advanced, there is growing recognition of the importance of incorporating human and social factors into these models.
• Current large language models (LLMs) often do not adequately represent the human context and authors of the text they are trained on.
• To build NLP systems that truly understand human language, researchers advocate for integrating more human contexts and perspectives into LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

NLP systems are computer programs that can analyze and understand human language. As these systems have become more sophisticated, researchers have realized that they need to take into account more than just the words themselves. The way people use language is heavily influenced by their individual backgrounds, experiences, and social contexts.

However, the large language models that power many of today's NLP applications often lack this kind of human context. They are trained on vast amounts of text from the internet, but don't necessarily capture the nuances of how real people communicate.

The researchers argue that to build NLP systems that can genuinely comprehend human language, we need to find ways to better integrate these human factors into the language models. This could involve training the models on data that provides more insight into the authors and their circumstances, or developing modeling approaches that can dynamically account for the changing nature of human context.

Ultimately, the goal is to create "large human language models" (LHLMs) that can understand language the way humans do - taking into account not just the words, but the full human context behind them.

Technical Explanation

The paper outlines three key positions the authors advocate for in developing more human-centric large language models:

1. LM training should include the human context. Current LLMs are primarily trained on text data without much metadata about the authors or circumstances. Incorporating more information about the human sources and contexts of the training data could help the models better capture nuances of real-world language use.

2. LHLMs should recognize that people are more than their group(s). Rather than just modeling broad demographic or social categories, LHLMs should strive to represent the full complexity and intersectionality of individual human identities and experiences.

3. LHLMs should be able to account for the dynamic and temporally-dependent nature of human context. People's language, perspectives, and social circumstances are constantly evolving. LHLMs need modeling approaches that can adapt to these changes over time.

The paper discusses relevant prior research and highlights open challenges that need to be addressed to realize these human-centric LHLM goals, such as data collection, representation learning, and dynamic modeling strategies.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of incorporating more human and social factors into NLP systems, which have historically been quite text-centric and divorced from real-world human contexts. The three positions outlined provide a useful framework for thinking about the key design considerations and research directions.

That said, the paper acknowledges that realizing these goals for more human-centered large language models poses significant technical challenges. Collecting and representing rich metadata about text authors and their contexts is non-trivial, as is developing dynamic modeling approaches that can account for the fluid nature of human language and identity.

Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore potential privacy, fairness, and ethical concerns that could arise from modeling human identities and contexts so extensively. There may be risks of reinforcing stereotypes or enabling misuse of sensitive personal information that would need to be carefully considered.

Overall, the paper makes a strong case for the importance of this research direction, but there remains much work to be done to translate the high-level vision into concrete, responsible LHLM systems.

Conclusion

As natural language processing systems become more advanced and prevalent, there is a growing recognition that they need to better account for the human contexts and social factors underlying language use. Current large language models often lack these crucial elements, leading to limitations in their ability to truly understand human communication.

This paper lays out a compelling case for developing "large human language models" (LHLMs) that can more effectively integrate human perspectives and experiences. The authors advocate for key principles like including more human metadata in training, avoiding over-simplistic group-based representations, and enabling dynamic modeling of evolving contexts.

Realizing this vision for human-centric NLP will require tackling significant technical challenges, as well as carefully navigating important ethical considerations. But the potential benefits - language models that can engage with the full richness and nuance of human expression - make this a vital area of research for the field.