Learning S-Matrix Phases with Neural Operators

Overview

• The paper explores the use of Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs) to study the relationship between the modulus and phase of amplitudes in 2-to-2 elastic scattering at fixed energies.
• Unlike previous approaches, the researchers do not use the integral relation imposed by unitarity, but instead train FNOs to discover this relationship from many samples of amplitudes with finite partial wave expansions.
• The FNO model can correctly predict the (unique or ambiguous) phases of amplitudes with infinite partial wave expansions when trained only on true samples.
• When also trained on false samples, the FNO can produce a true/false classifying index that is strongly correlated with the violation of the unitarity constraint for the predicted phase, and can delineate the boundary between allowed and disallowed profiles of the modulus.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a novel approach to studying the relationship between the modulus (or absolute value) and phase of amplitudes in a type of particle physics experiment called 2-to-2 elastic scattering. In these experiments, particles interact and scatter off each other, and the researchers are interested in understanding the patterns and connections between the different properties of the scattered particles.

Traditionally, researchers have used a mathematical concept called unitarity to study this relationship. Unitarity imposes certain constraints on the possible values of the modulus and phase. However, the authors of this paper took a different approach. Instead of using the unitarity constraint directly, they trained a type of artificial intelligence model called a Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) to learn the relationship between modulus and phase from many samples of amplitudes with finite partial wave expansions.

The key finding is that when the FNO model was trained only on "true" samples (i.e., samples that obey the unitarity constraint), it was able to correctly predict the unique or ambiguous phases of amplitudes with infinite partial wave expansions. This means the model was able to discover the unitarity constraint on its own, without being explicitly told about it.

Furthermore, when the researchers also trained the FNO on "false" samples (i.e., samples that violate the unitarity constraint), the model was able to produce a classification index that could identify which predicted phases were allowed (i.e., obeyed unitarity) and which were not. This index was strongly correlated with the degree of violation of the unitarity constraint.

This approach is unconventional in that it combines regression (predicting the phase) and classification (identifying allowed vs. disallowed phases) tasks in a single model. The authors argue that this highlights the important role of statistics and ensemble learning in the application of Fourier Neural Operators to problems in theoretical physics.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on using Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs) to study the relationship between the modulus and phase of amplitudes in 2-to-2 elastic scattering at fixed energies. Unlike previous approaches, the researchers do not employ the integral relation imposed by unitarity, but instead train FNOs to discover this relationship from many samples of amplitudes with finite partial wave expansions.

The key elements of the research are:

1. Experiment Design: The researchers generated many samples of amplitudes with finite partial wave expansions, some of which obeyed the unitarity constraint (true samples) and some of which violated it (false samples).
2. Architecture: They used FNOs, a type of neural network architecture that is well-suited for learning the underlying physics of complex systems, to model the relationship between the modulus and phase of the amplitudes.
3. Training: The FNOs were trained in two ways: 1) only on true samples, and 2) on a mixture of true and false samples. The goal was to see if the model could discover the unitarity constraint and also identify which predicted phases were allowed and which were not.
4. Insights: The trained FNOs were able to correctly predict the (unique or ambiguous) phases of amplitudes with infinite partial wave expansions when trained only on true samples, effectively discovering the unitarity constraint. When also trained on false samples, the FNOs could produce a true/false classifying index that was strongly correlated with the violation of the unitarity constraint for the predicted phase, and could delineate the boundary between allowed and disallowed profiles of the modulus.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several caveats and limitations of their approach:

1. Reliance on Finite Samples: The FNOs were trained on finite sets of amplitudes, which may not fully capture the underlying physics. Extending the analysis to larger ensembles of samples could provide more robust and generalizable insights.
2. Ambiguity in Phase Predictions: While the FNOs could correctly predict the phases of amplitudes with infinite partial wave expansions, some of these predictions were ambiguous. Further work is needed to understand the sources of this ambiguity and how to resolve it.
3. Interpreting the Classifying Index: The true/false classifying index produced by the FNOs when trained on both true and false samples is a useful diagnostic tool, but its precise interpretation and relationship to the underlying physics may require additional investigation.

Additionally, one could question whether the simultaneous regression-classification task employed in this study is the most natural or efficient way to approach the problem. Alternative architectures or training strategies that more directly incorporate the unitarity constraint may be worth exploring.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting and unconventional application of Fourier Neural Operators to a problem in theoretical physics. The authors' emphasis on the role of statistics and ensemble learning in this context is a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the use of machine learning techniques in physics.

Conclusion

This paper explores a novel approach to studying the relationship between the modulus and phase of amplitudes in 2-to-2 elastic scattering experiments using Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs). By training FNOs on samples of amplitudes with finite partial wave expansions, the researchers were able to discover the unitarity constraint that traditionally governs this relationship, without explicitly incorporating it into their model.

Furthermore, when the FNOs were trained on a mix of true and false samples, they were able to produce a classifying index that could distinguish between allowed and disallowed profiles of the modulus, highlighting the potential of this approach to provide new insights into the underlying physics.

While the paper acknowledges several caveats and limitations, it represents an unconventional and promising application of machine learning techniques to problems in theoretical physics. The authors' emphasis on the role of statistics and ensemble learning in this context could inspire new methodologies and avenues of research in the field.