Learning to Ask: When LLMs Meet Unclear Instruction

Overview

• The paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can learn to handle unclear or ambiguous instructions by proactively asking for clarification.
• The researchers propose a framework called Noisy ToolBench to train LLMs to engage in interactive dialog to resolve ambiguities in task instructions.
• Key findings include that LLMs can learn to ask relevant clarifying questions and that this ability improves performance on downstream tasks with unclear instructions.

Plain English Explanation

When we give instructions to a computer or AI system, we often make assumptions about what we mean that may not be clear to the system. This can lead to mistakes or undesirable outcomes. The researchers in this paper wanted to see if they could train large language models (LLMs) - the powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text - to proactively ask for clarification when faced with unclear instructions.

The researchers developed a framework called Noisy ToolBench to train the LLMs. This involved having the LLMs practice carrying on a conversation where they would be given a task to do, but the instructions were purposefully ambiguous or confusing. The LLMs then had to figure out what information they were missing and ask relevant follow-up questions to get the clarity they needed to complete the task successfully.

Through this interactive training process, the researchers found that the LLMs did learn to ask good clarifying questions. And when they later used these trained LLMs on new tasks with unclear instructions, the LLMs' ability to ask for clarification helped them perform better compared to LLMs that didn't have this training.

The key insight here is that by teaching AI systems to proactively ask questions when they're unsure, we can help them handle real-world situations where instructions are not perfectly clear. This could make AI systems more robust and reliable when deployed in the real world.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a framework called Noisy ToolBench to train large language models (LLMs) to engage in interactive dialog to resolve ambiguities in task instructions. The framework involves generating "noisy" task descriptions with missing or unclear information, and then having the LLM interact with a dialog agent to ask clarifying questions and receive feedback to complete the task.

The researchers evaluated this approach using the GPT-3 LLM, training it on the Noisy ToolBench framework. They found that the trained GPT-3 model was able to ask relevant clarifying questions when faced with unclear task instructions, and this ability translated to improved performance on downstream tasks with ambiguous prompts.

The key technical contributions include:

1. The Noisy ToolBench framework for generating interactive dialog training data with unclear instructions.
2. Demonstrating that LLMs can learn to ask effective clarifying questions through this training process.
3. Showing that the ability to ask clarifying questions leads to better performance on tasks with ambiguous instructions, compared to LLMs without this training.

The paper provides details on the Noisy ToolBench data generation process, the model architecture and training procedure, and the evaluation on downstream tasks. The results suggest that teaching LLMs to proactively seek clarification can make them more robust and capable of handling real-world situations with unclear or incomplete information.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving the robustness of large language models (LLMs) when faced with unclear or ambiguous instructions. By training the models to engage in interactive dialog to seek clarification, the researchers have shown that LLMs can learn to ask relevant follow-up questions and improve their performance on downstream tasks.

One potential limitation is the scope of the evaluation - the paper focuses on a specific set of tasks and it's unclear how generalizable the findings would be to a wider range of real-world applications. Additionally, the training process in Noisy ToolBench may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of real-world interactions.

Another area for further research could be exploring ways to make the clarification-seeking process more natural and human-like. The current approach relies on a separate dialog agent, but integrating the clarification-seeking directly into the LLM's language generation could lead to more seamless interactions.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by demonstrating the potential of teaching LLMs to proactively ask questions when faced with unclear information. This is an important step towards making AI systems more robust and reliable in real-world applications.

Conclusion

The paper "Learning to Ask: When LLMs Meet Unclear Instruction" explores a novel approach to improving the robustness of large language models (LLMs) by training them to engage in interactive dialog to seek clarification when faced with ambiguous instructions.

The key insights from the research are that LLMs can be taught to ask relevant clarifying questions, and that this ability leads to improved performance on downstream tasks with unclear prompts. The proposed Noisy ToolBench framework provides a way to generate training data that simulates real-world situations with incomplete or ambiguous information.

This work represents an important step towards making AI systems more reliable and capable of handling the complexities of the real world. By teaching LLMs to proactively ask questions, we can help them overcome the limitations of their training data and make them more robust when deployed in unpredictable environments.

The findings in this paper could have wide-ranging implications for the development of AI assistants, conversational agents, and other applications where clear and effective communication is crucial. As the authors note, further research is needed to explore the generalizability of this approach and to integrate the clarification-seeking process more seamlessly into the LLM's language generation. Nevertheless, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of advanced language modeling and its application in the real world.