Learning to Maximize Gains From Trade in Small Markets
2401.11596
0
0
Abstract
We study the problem of designing a two-sided market (double auction) to maximize the gains from trade (social welfare) under the constraints of (dominant-strategy) incentive compatibility and budget-balance. Our goal is to do so for an unknown distribution from which we are given a polynomial number of samples. Our first result is a general impossibility for the case of correlated distributions of values even between just one seller and two buyers, in contrast to the case of one seller and one buyer (bilateral trade) where this is possible. Our second result is an efficient learning algorithm for one seller and two buyers in the case of independent distributions which is based on a novel algorithm for computing optimal mechanisms for finitely supported and explicitly given independent distributions. Both results rely heavily on characterizations of (dominant-strategy) incentive compatible mechanisms that are strongly budget-balanced.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates how to maximize the gains from trade in small markets, where the number of buyers and sellers is limited.
- The authors propose a novel approach that involves online learning to identify optimal trading strategies for these smaller markets.
- The research is supported by funding from the European Research Council and the Israeli Science Foundation.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how to get the most benefit from buying and selling in small markets, where there are only a few buyers and sellers. In these smaller markets, it can be challenging to find the best trading strategies. The researchers developed a new method that uses online learning to help identify the optimal trading approach. This means the system learns and adapts as it goes, to figure out the best way to maximize the gains from trading in these limited markets. The work was funded by prominent research organizations, indicating it is an important issue worth studying.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel approach to maximizing gains from trade in small markets. The authors develop an online learning algorithm that can identify optimal trading strategies in these smaller market settings, where the number of buyers and sellers is limited.
The proposed method builds on prior work in two-sided market recruitment and fair online bilateral trade. It incorporates techniques from autobidder budget and ROI constraints and strategy-proof auctions to efficiently learn and adapt trading strategies in real-time.
Through theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach in maximizing gains from trade in small market settings. The results show significant performance improvements over existing methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-designed and thorough investigation of the important problem of maximizing gains from trade in small markets. The online learning approach seems promising, though the authors acknowledge the need for further research to explore its scalability and real-world applicability.
One potential limitation is the focus on a specific small market setting. It would be valuable to understand how the approach generalizes to a wider range of market sizes and structures. Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential ethical or societal implications of the proposed trading strategies, which could be an interesting area for future work.
Overall, this is a strong technical contribution that advances the state of the art in this domain. However, further research is needed to fully understand the practical impacts and broader implications of the proposed methods.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel online learning approach to maximizing gains from trade in small market settings. The work is technically sophisticated and demonstrates significant performance improvements over existing methods. While the scope is limited to specific market conditions, the research represents an important step forward in understanding how to optimize trading in constrained environments. The findings have the potential to inform real-world applications and spur further advancements in this area of study.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👁️
Trading Volume Maximization with Online Learning
Tommaso Cesari, Roberto Colomboni
0
0
We explore brokerage between traders in an online learning framework. At any round $t$, two traders meet to exchange an asset, provided the exchange is mutually beneficial. The broker proposes a trading price, and each trader tries to sell their asset or buy the asset from the other party, depending on whether the price is higher or lower than their private valuations. A trade happens if one trader is willing to sell and the other is willing to buy at the proposed price. Previous work provided guidance to a broker aiming at enhancing traders' total earnings by maximizing the gain from trade, defined as the sum of the traders' net utilities after each interaction. In contrast, we investigate how the broker should behave to maximize the trading volume, i.e., the total number of trades. We model the traders' valuations as an i.i.d. process with an unknown distribution. If the traders' valuations are revealed after each interaction (full-feedback), and the traders' valuations cumulative distribution function (cdf) is continuous, we provide an algorithm achieving logarithmic regret and show its optimality up to constant factors. If only their willingness to sell or buy at the proposed price is revealed after each interaction ($2$-bit feedback), we provide an algorithm achieving poly-logarithmic regret when the traders' valuations cdf is Lipschitz and show that this rate is near-optimal. We complement our results by analyzing the implications of dropping the regularity assumptions on the unknown traders' valuations cdf. If we drop the continuous cdf assumption, the regret rate degrades to $Theta(sqrt{T})$ in the full-feedback case, where $T$ is the time horizon. If we drop the Lipschitz cdf assumption, learning becomes impossible in the $2$-bit feedback case.
5/24/2024
📉
The Power of Two-sided Recruitment in Two-sided Markets
Yang Cai, Christopher Liaw, Aranyak Mehta, Mingfei Zhao
0
0
We consider the problem of maximizing the gains from trade (GFT) in two-sided markets. The seminal impossibility result by Myerson and Satterthwaite shows that even for bilateral trade, there is no individually rational (IR), Bayesian incentive compatible (BIC) and budget balanced (BB) mechanism that can achieve the full GFT. Moreover, the optimal BIC, IR and BB mechanism that maximizes the GFT is known to be complex and heavily depends on the prior. In this paper, we pursue a Bulow-Klemperer-style question, i.e., does augmentation allow for prior-independent mechanisms to compete against the optimal mechanism? Our first main result shows that in the double auction setting with $m$ i.i.d. buyers and $n$ i.i.d. sellers, by augmenting $O(1)$ buyers and sellers to the market, the GFT of a simple, dominant strategy incentive compatible (DSIC), and prior-independent mechanism in the augmented market is at least the optimal in the original market, when the buyers' distribution first-order stochastically dominates the sellers' distribution. Next, we go beyond the i.i.d. setting and study the power of two-sided recruitment in more general markets. Our second main result is that for any $epsilon > 0$ and any set of $O(1/epsilon)$ buyers and sellers where the buyers' value exceeds the sellers' value with constant probability, if we add these additional agents into any market with arbitrary correlations, the Trade Reduction mechanism obtains a $(1-epsilon)$-approximation of the GFT of the augmented market. Importantly, the newly recruited agents are agnostic to the original market.
4/1/2024
🎯
Fair Online Bilateral Trade
Franc{c}ois Bachoc, Nicol`o Cesa-Bianchi, Tommaso Cesari, Roberto Colomboni
0
0
In online bilateral trade, a platform posts prices to incoming pairs of buyers and sellers that have private valuations for a certain good. If the price is lower than the buyers' valuation and higher than the sellers' valuation, then a trade takes place. Previous work focused on the platform perspective, with the goal of setting prices maximizing the gain from trade (the sum of sellers' and buyers' utilities). Gain from trade is, however, potentially unfair to traders, as they may receive highly uneven shares of the total utility. In this work we enforce fairness by rewarding the platform with the fair gain from trade, defined as the minimum between sellers' and buyers' utilities. After showing that any no-regret learning algorithm designed to maximize the sum of the utilities may fail badly with fair gain from trade, we present our main contribution: a complete characterization of the regret regimes for fair gain from trade when, after each interaction, the platform only learns whether each trader accepted the current price. Specifically, we prove the following regret bounds: $Theta(ln T)$ in the deterministic setting, $Omega(T)$ in the stochastic setting, and $tilde{Theta}(T^{2/3})$ in the stochastic setting when sellers' and buyers' valuations are independent of each other. We conclude by providing tight regret bounds when, after each interaction, the platform is allowed to observe the true traders' valuations.
5/24/2024
📉
Autobidders with Budget and ROI Constraints: Efficiency, Regret, and Pacing Dynamics
Brendan Lucier, Sarath Pattathil, Aleksandrs Slivkins, Mengxiao Zhang
0
0
We study a game between autobidding algorithms that compete in an online advertising platform. Each autobidder is tasked with maximizing its advertiser's total value over multiple rounds of a repeated auction, subject to budget and return-on-investment constraints. We propose a gradient-based learning algorithm that is guaranteed to satisfy all constraints and achieves vanishing individual regret. Our algorithm uses only bandit feedback and can be used with the first- or second-price auction, as well as with any intermediate auction format. Our main result is that when these autobidders play against each other, the resulting expected liquid welfare over all rounds is at least half of the expected optimal liquid welfare achieved by any allocation. This holds whether or not the bidding dynamics converges to an equilibrium.
6/13/2024