Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges
2401.07103
0
0
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving domain of Natural Language Generation (NLG) evaluation, introducing Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. This paper aims to provide a thorough overview of leveraging LLMs for NLG evaluation, a burgeoning area that lacks a systematic analysis. We propose a coherent taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics, offering a structured framework to understand and compare these methods. Our detailed exploration includes critically assessing various LLM-based methodologies, as well as comparing their strengths and limitations in evaluating NLG outputs. By discussing unresolved challenges, including bias, robustness, domain-specificity, and unified evaluation, this paper seeks to offer insights to researchers and advocate for fairer and more advanced NLG evaluation techniques.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of using large language models (LLMs) for natural language generation (NLG) evaluation.
- It covers the formalization and taxonomy of NLG evaluation, the use of LLMs for generative evaluation, and the challenges and solutions in this emerging area.
- The survey highlights the potential of LLMs to revolutionize NLG evaluation, offering insights that can inform future research and practical applications.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. Researchers are exploring how to leverage these models to evaluate the quality of text generated by other AI systems, a task known as natural language generation (NLG) evaluation.
The paper surveys the current state of using LLMs for NLG evaluation. It starts by defining the key concepts and categorizing the different approaches to NLG evaluation. Then, it delves into how LLMs can be used to generate evaluations, such as assessing the coherence, fluency, and relevance of the generated text.
The core idea is that LLMs, with their deep understanding of language, can provide more nuanced and insightful evaluations compared to traditional, rule-based methods. This could lead to significant improvements in how we assess the quality of AI-generated text, which has important implications for areas like machine translation, text summarization, and conversational AI.
The survey also highlights the challenges and potential solutions in this emerging field, such as how to train LLMs for specific evaluation tasks and evaluating the LLMs themselves for medical applications. By addressing these issues, the research can help unlock the full potential of LLMs in revolutionizing NLG evaluation.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by formalizing the NLG evaluation problem and proposing a taxonomy that categorizes the different approaches. This includes distinguishing between
The core of the paper focuses on the use of LLMs for
The authors discuss the potential benefits of this approach, including the ability to capture more nuanced and context-aware evaluations compared to traditional, rule-based metrics. They also delve into the technical challenges, such as how to effectively fine-tune or prompt the LLM for specific evaluation tasks, and how to ensure the reliability and robustness of the LLM-based evaluations.
The paper also covers the broader landscape of LLM research and its implications for NLG evaluation. This includes discussions of techniques for training and deploying LLMs, using LLMs as research assistants, and evaluating LLMs for specific domains like healthcare.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured survey of the use of LLMs for NLG evaluation, highlighting both the potential benefits and the challenges that need to be addressed.
One potential limitation is that the survey focuses primarily on the technical aspects of the problem, without delving deeply into the broader societal implications or ethical considerations of using LLMs for evaluation. As these systems become more widely adopted, it will be important to consider issues like bias, fairness, and transparency in the evaluation process.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential for LLMs to be used in
Overall, the paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working in the field of NLG evaluation. By synthesizing the current state of the art and identifying key research directions, it can help drive the development of more robust and reliable evaluation techniques using large language models.
Conclusion
This comprehensive survey paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for natural language generation (NLG) evaluation, a critical task in the development of advanced AI systems. The authors formalize the problem, propose a taxonomy of evaluation approaches, and dive deep into the potential of using LLMs for generative evaluation.
The key takeaway is that LLMs, with their powerful language understanding capabilities, can revolutionize NLG evaluation by providing more nuanced, context-aware assessments of generated text. This has far-reaching implications for a wide range of AI applications, from machine translation to text summarization and conversational AI.
While the paper highlights the technical challenges and potential solutions, it also underscores the need to consider the broader societal implications of using LLMs for evaluation. As these systems become more widely adopted, it will be crucial to ensure they are developed and deployed in a responsible and ethical manner.
Overall, this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working at the intersection of NLG, language models, and AI evaluation. By synthesizing the current state of the art and identifying key research directions, it can help drive the field forward and unlock the full potential of large language models in revolutionizing natural language generation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Natural Language Generation Tasks
Xuanfan Ni, Piji Li
0
0
Recent efforts have evaluated large language models (LLMs) in areas such as commonsense reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and code generation. However, to the best of our knowledge, no work has specifically investigated the performance of LLMs in natural language generation (NLG) tasks, a pivotal criterion for determining model excellence. Thus, this paper conducts a comprehensive evaluation of well-known and high-performing LLMs, namely ChatGPT, ChatGLM, T5-based models, LLaMA-based models, and Pythia-based models, in the context of NLG tasks. We select English and Chinese datasets encompassing Dialogue Generation and Text Summarization. Moreover, we propose a common evaluation setting that incorporates input templates and post-processing strategies. Our study reports both automatic results, accompanied by a detailed analysis.
5/17/2024
🚀
Unveiling LLM Evaluation Focused on Metrics: Challenges and Solutions
Taojun Hu, Xiao-Hua Zhou
0
0
Natural Language Processing (NLP) is witnessing a remarkable breakthrough driven by the success of Large Language Models (LLMs). LLMs have gained significant attention across academia and industry for their versatile applications in text generation, question answering, and text summarization. As the landscape of NLP evolves with an increasing number of domain-specific LLMs employing diverse techniques and trained on various corpus, evaluating performance of these models becomes paramount. To quantify the performance, it's crucial to have a comprehensive grasp of existing metrics. Among the evaluation, metrics which quantifying the performance of LLMs play a pivotal role. This paper offers a comprehensive exploration of LLM evaluation from a metrics perspective, providing insights into the selection and interpretation of metrics currently in use. Our main goal is to elucidate their mathematical formulations and statistical interpretations. We shed light on the application of these metrics using recent Biomedical LLMs. Additionally, we offer a succinct comparison of these metrics, aiding researchers in selecting appropriate metrics for diverse tasks. The overarching goal is to furnish researchers with a pragmatic guide for effective LLM evaluation and metric selection, thereby advancing the understanding and application of these large language models.
4/16/2024
💬
Exploring the landscape of large language models: Foundations, techniques, and challenges
Milad Moradi, Ke Yan, David Colwell, Matthias Samwald, Rhona Asgari
0
0
In this review paper, we delve into the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs), covering their foundational principles, diverse applications, and nuanced training processes. The article sheds light on the mechanics of in-context learning and a spectrum of fine-tuning approaches, with a special focus on methods that optimize efficiency in parameter usage. Additionally, it explores how LLMs can be more closely aligned with human preferences through innovative reinforcement learning frameworks and other novel methods that incorporate human feedback. The article also examines the emerging technique of retrieval augmented generation, integrating external knowledge into LLMs. The ethical dimensions of LLM deployment are discussed, underscoring the need for mindful and responsible application. Concluding with a perspective on future research trajectories, this review offers a succinct yet comprehensive overview of the current state and emerging trends in the evolving landscape of LLMs, serving as an insightful guide for both researchers and practitioners in artificial intelligence.
4/19/2024
💬
Apprentices to Research Assistants: Advancing Research with Large Language Models
M. Namvarpour, A. Razi
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in various research domains. This article examines their potential through a literature review and firsthand experimentation. While LLMs offer benefits like cost-effectiveness and efficiency, challenges such as prompt tuning, biases, and subjectivity must be addressed. The study presents insights from experiments utilizing LLMs for qualitative analysis, highlighting successes and limitations. Additionally, it discusses strategies for mitigating challenges, such as prompt optimization techniques and leveraging human expertise. This study aligns with the 'LLMs as Research Tools' workshop's focus on integrating LLMs into HCI data work critically and ethically. By addressing both opportunities and challenges, our work contributes to the ongoing dialogue on their responsible application in research.
4/10/2024