LSEnet: Lorentz Structural Entropy Neural Network for Deep Graph Clustering
2405.11801
0
0
Abstract
Graph clustering is a fundamental problem in machine learning. Deep learning methods achieve the state-of-the-art results in recent years, but they still cannot work without predefined cluster numbers. Such limitation motivates us to pose a more challenging problem of graph clustering with unknown cluster number. We propose to address this problem from a fresh perspective of graph information theory (i.e., structural information). In the literature, structural information has not yet been introduced to deep clustering, and its classic definition falls short of discrete formulation and modeling node features. In this work, we first formulate a differentiable structural information (DSI) in the continuous realm, accompanied by several theoretical results. By minimizing DSI, we construct the optimal partitioning tree where densely connected nodes in the graph tend to have the same assignment, revealing the cluster structure. DSI is also theoretically presented as a new graph clustering objective, not requiring the predefined cluster number. Furthermore, we design a neural LSEnet in the Lorentz model of hyperbolic space, where we integrate node features to structural information via manifold-valued graph convolution. Extensive empirical results on real graphs show the superiority of our approach.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces LSEnet, a novel deep learning model for graph clustering that leverages Lorentz Structural Entropy (LSE) to capture the structural information of graph data.
- LSEnet combines a graph convolutional network (GCN) with an LSE-based objective function to learn a robust and discriminative node representation for effective graph clustering.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of LSEnet on several benchmark graph clustering tasks, outperforming state-of-the-art methods.
Plain English Explanation
LSEnet is a new machine learning model that can be used to group the nodes (or data points) in a graph into meaningful clusters. Graphs are a way of representing data where the nodes are the individual data points, and the connections between them (the edges) show how the data points are related.
The key innovation in LSEnet is that it uses a concept called Lorentz Structural Entropy (LSE) to capture the structural information of the graph data. Structural information refers to the way the nodes are connected and organized within the graph. By incorporating LSE into the model, LSEnet is able to learn a more robust and informative representation of the graph data, which leads to better clustering performance.
LSEnet works by combining a graph convolutional network (GCN) with the LSE-based objective function. A GCN is a type of neural network that can directly process graph-structured data, learning features and representations that are tailored to the graph structure. The LSE-based objective function then ensures that the learned node representations preserve the important structural information of the graph.
By leveraging both the graph structure and the LSE-based objective, the authors show that LSEnet outperforms other state-of-the-art graph clustering methods on several benchmark datasets. This suggests that considering the structural properties of graph data can be a key factor in developing effective machine learning models for tasks like graph clustering.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces LSEnet, a novel deep learning model for graph clustering that leverages Lorentz Structural Entropy (LSE) to capture the structural information of graph data. LSEnet combines a graph convolutional network (GCN) with an LSE-based objective function to learn a robust and discriminative node representation for effective graph clustering.
The authors first provide a detailed review of related work in graph clustering and graph neural networks, highlighting the limitations of existing methods in effectively leveraging the structural information of graph data.
To address these limitations, the authors propose the LSEnet framework, which consists of a GCN-based encoder and an LSE-based objective function. The GCN encoder learns node representations that capture the local and global structure of the input graph. The LSE-based objective function is then used to guide the learning process, ensuring that the learned node representations preserve the important structural properties of the graph.
The authors conduct extensive experiments on several benchmark graph clustering datasets, including Cora, Citeseer, and Pubmed. They demonstrate that LSEnet outperforms state-of-the-art graph clustering methods, such as SEBOT and L-GCN, in terms of clustering accuracy and other evaluation metrics.
The authors also provide an analysis of the LSE-based objective function, showing its effectiveness in capturing the structural properties of the graph data. They further investigate the robustness of LSEnet to graph perturbations, demonstrating its ability to maintain high clustering performance even in the presence of structural changes to the input graph.
Critical Analysis
The authors of the LSEnet paper have made a compelling case for the importance of considering structural information in graph clustering tasks. By incorporating the Lorentz Structural Entropy (LSE) into the objective function, the LSEnet model is able to learn node representations that better capture the underlying graph structure, leading to improved clustering performance.
One potential limitation of the proposed approach is the computational complexity of the LSE-based objective function, which may pose challenges for scaling LSEnet to larger graph datasets. The authors acknowledge this issue and suggest that further research is needed to explore more efficient ways of incorporating structural information into the learning process.
Additionally, while the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of LSEnet on several benchmark datasets, it would be valuable to see how the model performs on real-world graph data with more complex and diverse structures. Restructuring graph data to have higher homophily may also be an interesting direction to explore, as it could further improve the clustering capabilities of LSEnet.
The authors also note that the current implementation of LSEnet is unsupervised, relying solely on the graph structure for clustering. Exploring ways to effectively integrate reinforcement learning-based structural information principles could potentially lead to even more powerful graph clustering models that can leverage both structural and label information.
Overall, the LSEnet paper presents a well-designed and promising approach for leveraging structural information in graph clustering tasks. The authors' attention to the importance of structural properties in graph data analysis is a valuable contribution to the field, and the LSEnet model offers a solid foundation for further developments in this direction.
Conclusion
The LSEnet paper introduces a novel deep learning model for graph clustering that effectively leverages the structural information of graph data through the use of Lorentz Structural Entropy (LSE). By combining a graph convolutional network (GCN) with an LSE-based objective function, LSEnet is able to learn robust and discriminative node representations that lead to improved clustering performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
The authors' focus on incorporating structural information into the learning process is a significant contribution to the field of graph analysis and machine learning. The strong experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate the potential of LSEnet to become a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working with graph-structured data.
While the paper highlights the strengths of the LSEnet approach, it also acknowledges the need for further research to address potential computational challenges and explore the model's performance on more complex real-world graph data. Integrating reinforcement learning principles and investigating the impact of graph restructuring techniques could be promising directions for future work.
Overall, the LSEnet paper offers a compelling solution for leveraging the structural properties of graphs in deep learning-based clustering tasks, and its insights have the potential to drive further advancements in the field of graph-based machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Differentiable Cluster Graph Neural Network
Yanfei Dong, Mohammed Haroon Dupty, Lambert Deng, Zhuanghua Liu, Yong Liang Goh, Wee Sun Lee
0
0
Graph Neural Networks often struggle with long-range information propagation and in the presence of heterophilous neighborhoods. We address both challenges with a unified framework that incorporates a clustering inductive bias into the message passing mechanism, using additional cluster-nodes. Central to our approach is the formulation of an optimal transport based implicit clustering objective function. However, the algorithm for solving the implicit objective function needs to be differentiable to enable end-to-end learning of the GNN. To facilitate this, we adopt an entropy regularized objective function and propose an iterative optimization process, alternating between solving for the cluster assignments and updating the node/cluster-node embeddings. Notably, our derived closed-form optimization steps are themselves simple yet elegant message passing steps operating seamlessly on a bipartite graph of nodes and cluster-nodes. Our clustering-based approach can effectively capture both local and global information, demonstrated by extensive experiments on both heterophilous and homophilous datasets.
5/28/2024
Synergistic Deep Graph Clustering Network
Benyu Wu, Shifei Ding, Xiao Xu, Lili Guo, Ling Ding, Xindong Wu
0
0
Employing graph neural networks (GNNs) to learn cohesive and discriminative node representations for clustering has shown promising results in deep graph clustering. However, existing methods disregard the reciprocal relationship between representation learning and structure augmentation. This study suggests that enhancing embedding and structure synergistically becomes imperative for GNNs to unleash their potential in deep graph clustering. A reliable structure promotes obtaining more cohesive node representations, while high-quality node representations can guide the augmentation of the structure, enhancing structural reliability in return. Moreover, the generalization ability of existing GNNs-based models is relatively poor. While they perform well on graphs with high homogeneity, they perform poorly on graphs with low homogeneity. To this end, we propose a graph clustering framework named Synergistic Deep Graph Clustering Network (SynC). In our approach, we design a Transform Input Graph Auto-Encoder (TIGAE) to obtain high-quality embeddings for guiding structure augmentation. Then, we re-capture neighborhood representations on the augmented graph to obtain clustering-friendly embeddings and conduct self-supervised clustering. Notably, representation learning and structure augmentation share weights, significantly reducing the number of model parameters. Additionally, we introduce a structure fine-tuning strategy to improve the model's generalization. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority and effectiveness of our method. The code is released on GitHub and Code Ocean.
6/26/2024
New!Federated Graph Semantic and Structural Learning
Wenke Huang, Guancheng Wan, Mang Ye, Bo Du
0
0
Federated graph learning collaboratively learns a global graph neural network with distributed graphs, where the non-independent and identically distributed property is one of the major challenges. Most relative arts focus on traditional distributed tasks like images and voices, incapable of graph structures. This paper firstly reveals that local client distortion is brought by both node-level semantics and graph-level structure. First, for node-level semantics, we find that contrasting nodes from distinct classes is beneficial to provide a well-performing discrimination. We pull the local node towards the global node of the same class and push it away from the global node of different classes. Second, we postulate that a well-structural graph neural network possesses similarity for neighbors due to the inherent adjacency relationships. However, aligning each node with adjacent nodes hinders discrimination due to the potential class inconsistency. We transform the adjacency relationships into the similarity distribution and leverage the global model to distill the relation knowledge into the local model, which preserves the structural information and discriminability of the local model. Empirical results on three graph datasets manifest the superiority of the proposed method over its counterparts.
6/28/2024
🖼️
Enhancing Graph Transformers with Hierarchical Distance Structural Encoding
Yuankai Luo, Hongkang Li, Lei Shi, Xiao-Ming Wu
0
0
Graph transformers need strong inductive biases to derive meaningful attention scores. Yet, current methods often fall short in capturing longer ranges, hierarchical structures, or community structures, which are common in various graphs such as molecules, social networks, and citation networks. This paper presents a Hierarchical Distance Structural Encoding (HDSE) method to model node distances in a graph, focusing on its multi-level, hierarchical nature. We introduce a novel framework to seamlessly integrate HDSE into the attention mechanism of existing graph transformers, allowing for simultaneous application with other positional encodings. To apply graph transformers with HDSE to large-scale graphs, we further propose a high-level HDSE that effectively biases the linear transformers towards graph hierarchies. We theoretically prove the superiority of HDSE over shortest path distances in terms of expressivity and generalization. Empirically, we demonstrate that graph transformers with HDSE excel in graph classification, regression on 7 graph-level datasets, and node classification on 11 large-scale graphs, including those with up to a billion nodes.
5/28/2024