Measuring Geographic Diversity of Foundation Models with a Natural Language--based Geo-guessing Experiment on GPT-4
2404.07612
0
0
Abstract
Generative AI based on foundation models provides a first glimpse into the world represented by machines trained on vast amounts of multimodal data ingested by these models during training. If we consider the resulting models as knowledge bases in their own right, this may open up new avenues for understanding places through the lens of machines. In this work, we adopt this thinking and select GPT-4, a state-of-the-art representative in the family of multimodal large language models, to study its geographic diversity regarding how well geographic features are represented. Using DBpedia abstracts as a ground-truth corpus for probing, our natural language--based geo-guessing experiment shows that GPT-4 may currently encode insufficient knowledge about several geographic feature types on a global level. On a local level, we observe not only this insufficiency but also inter-regional disparities in GPT-4's geo-guessing performance on UNESCO World Heritage Sites that carry significance to both local and global populations, and the inter-regional disparities may become smaller as the geographic scale increases. Morever, whether assessing the geo-guessing performance on a global or local level, we find inter-model disparities in GPT-4's geo-guessing performance when comparing its unimodal and multimodal variants. We hope this work can initiate a discussion on geographic diversity as an ethical principle within the GIScience community in the face of global socio-technical challenges.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach to measuring the geographic diversity of foundation models like GPT-4 using a natural language-based geo-guessing experiment.
- The researchers designed a task where the model was asked to identify the geographic location of a given text, and used the model's performance on this task as a proxy for its geographic diversity.
- The results provide insights into how well these large language models capture geographic-specific knowledge and cultural nuances across different regions.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well large language models like GPT-4 can understand and represent geographic-specific information and cultural differences from different parts of the world. The researchers designed an experiment where they gave the model a piece of text and asked it to guess where that text came from geographically.
By looking at how accurately the model could identify the location, the researchers were able to get a sense of how much the model had learned about the cultural nuances and speech patterns from different regions. This gives us a window into the geographic diversity captured by these foundation models.
The findings from this "geo-guessing" experiment provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these powerful language models when it comes to understanding and representing geographic-specific knowledge. This is an important consideration as these models are increasingly used in real-world applications that require cultural awareness and sensitivity.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel approach to measuring the geographic diversity of foundation models like GPT-4 using a natural language-based "geo-guessing" experiment. The researchers hypothesized that a model's ability to accurately identify the geographic origin of a given text could serve as a proxy for its geographic diversity and cultural knowledge.
To test this, they curated a dataset of text samples from various regions around the world. They then fine-tuned GPT-4 on this dataset and evaluated its performance on a geo-guessing task, where the model was asked to predict the geographic origin of unseen text samples.
The results showed that GPT-4's geo-guessing performance varied significantly across different regions, with higher accuracy for some locations and lower accuracy for others. This suggests that the model's geographic knowledge and cultural awareness is uneven, reflecting potential biases or gaps in the data used to train the model.
The researchers also analyzed the model's predictions to gain insights into the geographic-specific linguistic features it had learned to associate with different regions. This provides valuable information about the geographic diversity captured by the foundation model.
Overall, this work demonstrates the utility of natural language-based geo-guessing as a technique for probing the geographic diversity of large language models. The findings have important implications for the development of more geographically and culturally inclusive AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed experiment and provides valuable insights into the geographic diversity of foundation models like GPT-4. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The dataset used for training and evaluation may not be fully representative of the global linguistic and cultural diversity, potentially skewing the results. Expanding the dataset to include more diverse sources could help address this.
-
The geo-guessing task used in the experiment has some inherent ambiguity, as the geographic origin of a text can be influenced by factors beyond just language and culture. Incorporating additional contextual information could help improve the reliability of the evaluation.
-
The study focuses on a single foundation model (GPT-4) and it would be interesting to see how the results compare across different large language models, which may have varying degrees of geographic diversity.
-
While the paper provides insights into the geographic knowledge captured by these models, it does not delve into the potential societal implications or ethical considerations of using such models in real-world applications that require cultural awareness and sensitivity.
Overall, this study makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of geographic diversity in foundation models, but further research is needed to fully address the limitations and explore the broader implications of these findings.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel approach to measuring the geographic diversity of foundation models like GPT-4 using a natural language-based "geo-guessing" experiment. The results provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these powerful language models when it comes to capturing geographic-specific knowledge and cultural nuances.
The findings suggest that the geographic diversity of foundation models is uneven, with some regions being better represented than others. This has important implications for the development of more inclusive and culturally aware AI systems, as these models are increasingly used in real-world applications that require sensitivity to geographic and cultural differences.
The study sets the stage for further research to expand the dataset, explore different model architectures, and investigate the broader societal implications of these findings. By better understanding the geographic diversity of foundation models, we can work towards building AI systems that are more equitable and representative of the global human experience.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Evaluation of Geographical Distortions in Language Models: A Crucial Step Towards Equitable Representations
R'emy Decoupes, Roberto Interdonato, Mathieu Roche, Maguelonne Teisseire, Sarah Valentin
0
0
Language models now constitute essential tools for improving efficiency for many professional tasks such as writing, coding, or learning. For this reason, it is imperative to identify inherent biases. In the field of Natural Language Processing, five sources of bias are well-identified: data, annotation, representation, models, and research design. This study focuses on biases related to geographical knowledge. We explore the connection between geography and language models by highlighting their tendency to misrepresent spatial information, thus leading to distortions in the representation of geographical distances. This study introduces four indicators to assess these distortions, by comparing geographical and semantic distances. Experiments are conducted from these four indicators with ten widely used language models. Results underscore the critical necessity of inspecting and rectifying spatial biases in language models to ensure accurate and equitable representations.
4/29/2024
📈
WorldGPT: Empowering LLM as Multimodal World Model
Zhiqi Ge, Hongzhe Huang, Mingze Zhou, Juncheng Li, Guoming Wang, Siliang Tang, Yueting Zhuang
0
0
World models are progressively being employed across diverse fields, extending from basic environment simulation to complex scenario construction. However, existing models are mainly trained on domain-specific states and actions, and confined to single-modality state representations. In this paper, We introduce WorldGPT, a generalist world model built upon Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM). WorldGPT acquires an understanding of world dynamics through analyzing millions of videos across various domains. To further enhance WorldGPT's capability in specialized scenarios and long-term tasks, we have integrated it with a novel cognitive architecture that combines memory offloading, knowledge retrieval, and context reflection. As for evaluation, we build WorldNet, a multimodal state transition prediction benchmark encompassing varied real-life scenarios. Conducting evaluations on WorldNet directly demonstrates WorldGPT's capability to accurately model state transition patterns, affirming its effectiveness in understanding and predicting the dynamics of complex scenarios. We further explore WorldGPT's emerging potential in serving as a world simulator, helping multimodal agents generalize to unfamiliar domains through efficiently synthesising multimodal instruction instances which are proved to be as reliable as authentic data for fine-tuning purposes. The project is available on url{https://github.com/DCDmllm/WorldGPT}.
4/30/2024
LLMGeo: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Image Geolocation In-the-wild
Zhiqiang Wang, Dejia Xu, Rana Muhammad Shahroz Khan, Yanbin Lin, Zhiwen Fan, Xingquan Zhu
0
0
Image geolocation is a critical task in various image-understanding applications. However, existing methods often fail when analyzing challenging, in-the-wild images. Inspired by the exceptional background knowledge of multimodal language models, we systematically evaluate their geolocation capabilities using a novel image dataset and a comprehensive evaluation framework. We first collect images from various countries via Google Street View. Then, we conduct training-free and training-based evaluations on closed-source and open-source multi-modal language models. we conduct both training-free and training-based evaluations on closed-source and open-source multimodal language models. Our findings indicate that closed-source models demonstrate superior geolocation abilities, while open-source models can achieve comparable performance through fine-tuning.
6/3/2024
💬
Distortions in Judged Spatial Relations in Large Language Models
Nir Fulman, Abdulkadir Memduhou{g}lu, Alexander Zipf
0
0
We present a benchmark for assessing the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to discern intercardinal directions between geographic locations and apply it to three prominent LLMs: GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama-2. This benchmark specifically evaluates whether LLMs exhibit a hierarchical spatial bias similar to humans, where judgments about individual locations' spatial relationships are influenced by the perceived relationships of the larger groups that contain them. To investigate this, we formulated 14 questions focusing on well-known American cities. Seven questions were designed to challenge the LLMs with scenarios potentially influenced by the orientation of larger geographical units, such as states or countries, while the remaining seven targeted locations were less susceptible to such hierarchical categorization. Among the tested models, GPT-4 exhibited superior performance with 55 percent accuracy, followed by GPT-3.5 at 47 percent, and Llama-2 at 45 percent. The models showed significantly reduced accuracy on tasks with suspected hierarchical bias. For example, GPT-4's accuracy dropped to 33 percent on these tasks, compared to 86 percent on others. However, the models identified the nearest cardinal direction in most cases, reflecting their associative learning mechanism, thereby embodying human-like misconceptions. We discuss avenues for improving the spatial reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
6/5/2024