MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs
2407.01509
0
0
Abstract
We introduce MIA-Bench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on their ability to strictly adhere to complex instructions. Our benchmark comprises a diverse set of 400 image-prompt pairs, each crafted to challenge the models' compliance with layered instructions in generating accurate responses that satisfy specific requested patterns. Evaluation results from a wide array of state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal significant variations in performance, highlighting areas for improvement in instruction fidelity. Additionally, we create extra training data and explore supervised fine-tuning to enhance the models' ability to strictly follow instructions without compromising performance on other tasks. We hope this benchmark not only serves as a tool for measuring MLLM adherence to instructions, but also guides future developments in MLLM training methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces MIA-Bench, a new benchmark for evaluating the instruction-following capabilities of multimodal large language models (MMLMs).
- MIA-Bench focuses on assessing how well MMLMs can understand and carry out instructions that involve both textual and visual information.
- The benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks that capture different aspects of instruction following, such as generating visual instructions, understanding image implications, and evaluating multimodal instructions.
Plain English Explanation
MIA-Bench is a new way to test how well large AI language models that can process both text and images can follow instructions. These models, called multimodal large language models (MMLMs), are becoming increasingly powerful and are being used for a variety of tasks. However, it's important to understand how well they can actually understand and carry out instructions that involve both text and images.
MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs introduces a benchmark that aims to do just that. The benchmark includes a variety of tasks that assess different aspects of instruction following, such as:
- Generating visual instructions: Can the model create step-by-step instructions, including images, to teach someone how to do a task?
- Understanding image implications: Can the model infer the meaning and implications of an image, even when the image is not explicitly described in the instructions?
- Evaluating multimodal instructions: Can the model judge how well instructions that combine text and images achieve their intended goal?
By testing MMLMs on this diverse set of tasks, the researchers hope to get a better understanding of the strengths and limitations of these models when it comes to following complex, multimodal instructions.
Technical Explanation
MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs introduces a new benchmark called MIA-Bench (Multimodal Instruction-Following Assessment Benchmark) for evaluating the instruction-following capabilities of multimodal large language models (MMLMs).
The benchmark includes three main task categories:
- Multimodal Instruction Generation: Tasks that require the model to generate step-by-step instructions, including both text and images, to teach someone how to perform a task.
- Image Implication Understanding: Tasks that assess the model's ability to understand the implications and meanings of images, even when they are not explicitly described in the instructions.
- Multimodal Instruction Evaluation: Tasks that ask the model to judge how well a set of instructions, combining text and images, achieve their intended goal.
The researchers curated a diverse set of tasks within each category, covering a wide range of domains and complexity levels. This allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of the models' instruction-following abilities.
The paper also introduces a novel zero-shot evaluation protocol, where models are tested on tasks they have not been explicitly trained on. This provides a more realistic assessment of the models' generalization capabilities, as opposed to fine-tuning on specific tasks.
The authors benchmark several state-of-the-art MMLMs on MIA-Bench and provide a detailed analysis of the models' performance. The results highlight the strengths and limitations of current MMLMs in understanding and following multimodal instructions, which can inform future model development and research directions.
Critical Analysis
The MIA-Bench benchmark presents a valuable contribution to the field of multimodal instruction following, as it addresses an important gap in the existing evaluation of MMLMs.
One potential limitation of the benchmark is the reliance on a zero-shot evaluation protocol, which may not fully capture the models' abilities when fine-tuned on specific tasks. While this approach provides a more realistic assessment of generalization, it could also underestimate the models' potential performance when optimized for particular instruction-following scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the underlying reasons for the models' successes and failures on the various MIA-Bench tasks. Further analysis of the models' strengths, weaknesses, and biases could provide deeper insights into the challenges of multimodal instruction following and guide future research.
MM-Instruct: Generated Visual Instructions for Large Multimodal Models and II-Bench: Image Implication Understanding Benchmark for Multimodal are related efforts that could provide complementary perspectives and insights to the MIA-Bench framework.
Conclusion
The MIA-Bench benchmark introduced in this paper represents an important step towards a more comprehensive evaluation of multimodal instruction-following capabilities in large language models. By testing models on a diverse set of tasks that involve both textual and visual information, the benchmark provides a more realistic assessment of the models' real-world performance.
The insights gained from MIA-Bench can inform the development of more robust and versatile multimodal language models, which will be crucial as these technologies become more widely adopted and integrated into various applications. As the field of multimodal AI continues to evolve, benchmarks like MIA-Bench will play a vital role in driving progress and ensuring that these models can reliably understand and follow complex, multimodal instructions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
MM-InstructEval: Zero-Shot Evaluation of (Multimodal) Large Language Models on Multimodal Reasoning Tasks
Xiaocui Yang, Wenfang Wu, Shi Feng, Ming Wang, Daling Wang, Yang Li, Qi Sun, Yifei Zhang, Xiaoming Fu, Soujanya Poria
0
0
The rising popularity of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has sparked a significant increase in research dedicated to evaluating these models. However, current evaluation studies predominantly concentrate on the ability of models to comprehend and reason within a unimodal (vision-only) context, overlooking critical performance evaluations in complex multimodal reasoning tasks that integrate both visual and text contexts. Furthermore, tasks that demand reasoning across multiple modalities pose greater challenges and require a deep understanding of multimodal contexts. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive assessment framework named MM-InstructEval, which integrates a diverse array of metrics to provide an extensive evaluation of the performance of various models and instructions across a broad range of multimodal reasoning tasks with vision-text contexts. MM-InstructEval enhances the research on the performance of MLLMs in complex multimodal reasoning tasks, facilitating a more thorough and holistic zero-shot evaluation of MLLMs. We firstly utilize the Best Performance metric to determine the upper performance limit of each model across various datasets. The Mean Relative Gain metric provides an analysis of the overall performance across different models and instructions, while the Stability metric evaluates their sensitivity to variations. Historically, the research has focused on evaluating models independently or solely assessing instructions, overlooking the interplay between models and instructions. To address this gap, we introduce the Adaptability metric, designed to quantify the degree of adaptability between models and instructions. Evaluations are conducted on 31 models (23 MLLMs) across 16 multimodal datasets, covering 6 tasks, with 10 distinct instructions. The extensive analysis enables us to derive novel insights.
5/14/2024
🏅
MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark
Dongping Chen, Ruoxi Chen, Shilin Zhang, Yinuo Liu, Yaochen Wang, Huichi Zhou, Qihui Zhang, Yao Wan, Pan Zhou, Lichao Sun
0
0
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained significant attention recently, showing remarkable potential in artificial general intelligence. However, assessing the utility of MLLMs presents considerable challenges, primarily due to the absence of multimodal benchmarks that align with human preferences. Drawing inspiration from the concept of LLM-as-a-Judge within LLMs, this paper introduces a novel benchmark, termed MLLM-as-a-Judge, to assess the ability of MLLMs in assisting judges across diverse modalities, encompassing three distinct tasks: Scoring Evaluation, Pair Comparison, and Batch Ranking. Our study reveals that, while MLLMs demonstrate remarkable human-like discernment in Pair Comparison, there is a significant divergence from human preferences in Scoring Evaluation and Batch Ranking. Furthermore, a closer examination reveals persistent challenges in the judgment capacities of LLMs, including diverse biases, hallucinatory responses, and inconsistencies in judgment, even in advanced models such as GPT-4V. These findings emphasize the pressing need for enhancements and further research efforts to be undertaken before regarding MLLMs as fully reliable evaluators. In light of this, we advocate for additional efforts dedicated to supporting the continuous development within the domain of MLLM functioning as judges. The code and dataset are publicly available at our project homepage: url{https://mllm-judge.github.io/}.
6/12/2024
🖼️
II-Bench: An Image Implication Understanding Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models
Ziqiang Liu, Feiteng Fang, Xi Feng, Xinrun Du, Chenhao Zhang, Zekun Wang, Yuelin Bai, Qixuan Zhao, Liyang Fan, Chengguang Gan, Hongquan Lin, Jiaming Li, Yuansheng Ni, Haihong Wu, Yaswanth Narsupalli, Zhigang Zheng, Chengming Li, Xiping Hu, Ruifeng Xu, Xiaojun Chen, Min Yang, Jiaheng Liu, Ruibo Liu, Wenhao Huang, Ge Zhang, Shiwen Ni
0
0
The rapid advancements in the development of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have consistently led to new breakthroughs on various benchmarks. In response, numerous challenging and comprehensive benchmarks have been proposed to more accurately assess the capabilities of MLLMs. However, there is a dearth of exploration of the higher-order perceptual capabilities of MLLMs. To fill this gap, we propose the Image Implication understanding Benchmark, II-Bench, which aims to evaluate the model's higher-order perception of images. Through extensive experiments on II-Bench across multiple MLLMs, we have made significant findings. Initially, a substantial gap is observed between the performance of MLLMs and humans on II-Bench. The pinnacle accuracy of MLLMs attains 74.8%, whereas human accuracy averages 90%, peaking at an impressive 98%. Subsequently, MLLMs perform worse on abstract and complex images, suggesting limitations in their ability to understand high-level semantics and capture image details. Finally, it is observed that most models exhibit enhanced accuracy when image sentiment polarity hints are incorporated into the prompts. This observation underscores a notable deficiency in their inherent understanding of image sentiment. We believe that II-Bench will inspire the community to develop the next generation of MLLMs, advancing the journey towards expert artificial general intelligence (AGI). II-Bench is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/m-a-p/II-Bench.
6/12/2024
MM-Instruct: Generated Visual Instructions for Large Multimodal Model Alignment
Jihao Liu, Xin Huang, Jinliang Zheng, Boxiao Liu, Jia Wang, Osamu Yoshie, Yu Liu, Hongsheng Li
0
0
This paper introduces MM-Instruct, a large-scale dataset of diverse and high-quality visual instruction data designed to enhance the instruction-following capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs). While existing visual instruction datasets often focus on question-answering, they struggle to generalize to broader application scenarios such as creative writing, summarization, or image analysis. To address these limitations, we propose a novel approach to constructing MM-Instruct that leverages the strong instruction-following capabilities of existing LLMs to generate novel visual instruction data from large-scale but conventional image captioning datasets. MM-Instruct first leverages ChatGPT to automatically generate diverse instructions from a small set of seed instructions through augmenting and summarization. It then matches these instructions with images and uses an open-sourced large language model (LLM) to generate coherent answers to the instruction-image pairs. The LLM is grounded by the detailed text descriptions of images in the whole answer generation process to guarantee the alignment of the instruction data. Moreover, we introduce a benchmark based on the generated instruction data to evaluate the instruction-following capabilities of existing LMMs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of MM-Instruct by training a LLaVA-1.5 model on the generated data, denoted as LLaVA-Instruct, which exhibits significant improvements in instruction-following capabilities compared to LLaVA-1.5 models. The MM-Instruct dataset, benchmark, and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/jihaonew/MM-Instruct.
7/1/2024