Mitigating Privacy Risk in Membership Inference by Convex-Concave Loss
2402.05453
0
0
🤯
Abstract
Machine learning models are susceptible to membership inference attacks (MIAs), which aim to infer whether a sample is in the training set. Existing work utilizes gradient ascent to enlarge the loss variance of training data, alleviating the privacy risk. However, optimizing toward a reverse direction may cause the model parameters to oscillate near local minima, leading to instability and suboptimal performance. In this work, we propose a novel method -- Convex-Concave Loss, which enables a high variance of training loss distribution by gradient descent. Our method is motivated by the theoretical analysis that convex losses tend to decrease the loss variance during training. Thus, our key idea behind CCL is to reduce the convexity of loss functions with a concave term. Trained with CCL, neural networks produce losses with high variance for training data, reinforcing the defense against MIAs. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of CCL, achieving state-of-the-art balance in the privacy-utility trade-off.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Machine learning models are vulnerable to membership inference attacks (MIAs), which aim to determine if a sample was part of the model's training data.
- Existing methods use gradient ascent to increase the loss variance of training data, reducing the privacy risk.
- However, this can lead to model instability and suboptimal performance.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models can be susceptible to membership inference attacks (MIAs). These attacks try to figure out whether a specific data sample was used to train the model.
Researchers have developed methods that use gradient ascent to increase the variation, or "variance," of the training data's loss values. This makes it harder for attackers to identify the training data. However, this approach can also cause the model's parameters to oscillate near local minima, leading to instability and reduced performance.
To address this, the researchers propose a new method called "Convex-Concave Loss" (CCL). The key idea behind CCL is to reduce the "convexity" of the loss function by adding a "concave" term. This results in training losses with high variance, which helps defend against MIAs, while still allowing the model to be trained effectively.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose a novel method called "Convex-Concave Loss" (CCL) to defend against membership inference attacks (MIAs). MIAs aim to determine whether a specific data sample was used to train a machine learning model.
Existing methods use gradient ascent to increase the loss variance of training data, making it harder for attackers to identify the training samples. However, this can cause the model parameters to oscillate near local minima, leading to instability and suboptimal performance.
The key insight behind CCL is that convex loss functions tend to decrease the loss variance during training. Therefore, the researchers reduce the convexity of the loss function by adding a concave term. This results in training losses with high variance, which reinforces the defense against MIAs, while still allowing the model to be trained effectively.
The researchers conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of CCL. The results demonstrate that CCL achieves a state-of-the-art balance between privacy (defense against MIAs) and utility (model performance).
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that while CCL provides a strong defense against membership inference attacks, it may not be a complete solution. The paper mentions that the method could be further improved by exploring alternative loss functions or incorporating additional techniques.
One potential limitation is that the effectiveness of CCL may depend on the specific dataset and model architecture. The researchers should consider evaluating the method on a wider range of datasets and model types to assess its general applicability.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the computational overhead or training time implications of the CCL method. This information would be valuable for understanding the practical tradeoffs and feasibility of deploying CCL in real-world scenarios.
Overall, the research presents a promising approach to mitigating membership inference attacks, but further investigation and refinement may be needed to address the potential limitations and make the method more robust and widely applicable.
Conclusion
The researchers have proposed a novel Convex-Concave Loss (CCL) method to defend against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on machine learning models. By reducing the convexity of the loss function, CCL is able to generate training losses with high variance, making it more difficult for attackers to identify the training data.
Extensive experiments demonstrate that CCL achieves a state-of-the-art balance between privacy (defense against MIAs) and utility (model performance). This work represents an important step forward in addressing the privacy challenges associated with machine learning models.
While CCL shows promise, the researchers acknowledge that further improvements and evaluations may be necessary to address potential limitations and make the method more robust and widely applicable. Nonetheless, this research contributes valuable insights and techniques to the ongoing effort to enhance the privacy and security of machine learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Center-Based Relaxed Learning Against Membership Inference Attacks
Xingli Fang, Jung-Eun Kim
0
0
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) are currently considered one of the main privacy attack strategies, and their defense mechanisms have also been extensively explored. However, there is still a gap between the existing defense approaches and ideal models in performance and deployment costs. In particular, we observed that the privacy vulnerability of the model is closely correlated with the gap between the model's data-memorizing ability and generalization ability. To address this, we propose a new architecture-agnostic training paradigm called center-based relaxed learning (CRL), which is adaptive to any classification model and provides privacy preservation by sacrificing a minimal or no loss of model generalizability. We emphasize that CRL can better maintain the model's consistency between member and non-member data. Through extensive experiments on standard classification datasets, we empirically show that this approach exhibits comparable performance without requiring additional model capacity or data costs.
5/30/2024
Better Membership Inference Privacy Measurement through Discrepancy
Ruihan Wu, Pengrun Huang, Kamalika Chaudhuri
0
0
Membership Inference Attacks have emerged as a dominant method for empirically measuring privacy leakage from machine learning models. Here, privacy is measured by the {em{advantage}} or gap between a score or a function computed on the training and the test data. A major barrier to the practical deployment of these attacks is that they do not scale to large well-generalized models -- either the advantage is relatively low, or the attack involves training multiple models which is highly compute-intensive. In this work, inspired by discrepancy theory, we propose a new empirical privacy metric that is an upper bound on the advantage of a family of membership inference attacks. We show that this metric does not involve training multiple models, can be applied to large Imagenet classification models in-the-wild, and has higher advantage than existing metrics on models trained with more recent and sophisticated training recipes. Motivated by our empirical results, we also propose new membership inference attacks tailored to these training losses.
5/27/2024
Confidence Is All You Need for MI Attacks
Abhishek Sinha, Himanshi Tibrewal, Mansi Gupta, Nikhar Waghela, Shivank Garg
0
0
In this evolving era of machine learning security, membership inference attacks have emerged as a potent threat to the confidentiality of sensitive data. In this attack, adversaries aim to determine whether a particular point was used during the training of a target model. This paper proposes a new method to gauge a data point's membership in a model's training set. Instead of correlating loss with membership, as is traditionally done, we have leveraged the fact that training examples generally exhibit higher confidence values when classified into their actual class. During training, the model is essentially being 'fit' to the training data and might face particular difficulties in generalization to unseen data. This asymmetry leads to the model achieving higher confidence on the training data as it exploits the specific patterns and noise present in the training data. Our proposed approach leverages the confidence values generated by the machine learning model. These confidence values provide a probabilistic measure of the model's certainty in its predictions and can further be used to infer the membership of a given data point. Additionally, we also introduce another variant of our method that allows us to carry out this attack without knowing the ground truth(true class) of a given data point, thus offering an edge over existing label-dependent attack methods.
6/21/2024
On the Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Privacy of Deep Learning
Marlon Tobaben, Joonas Jalko, Gauri Pradhan, Yuan He, Antti Honkela
0
0
We apply a state-of-the-art membership inference attack (MIA) to systematically test the practical privacy vulnerability of fine-tuning large image classification models. We focus on understanding the properties of data sets and samples that make them vulnerable to membership inference. In terms of data set properties, we find a strong power law dependence between the number of examples per class in the data and the MIA vulnerability, as measured by true positive rate of the attack at a low false positive rate. We train a linear model to predict true positive rate based on data set properties and observe good fit for MIA vulnerability on unseen data. To analyse the phenomenon theoretically, we reproduce the result on a simplified model of membership inference that behaves similarly to our experimental data. We prove that in this model, the logarithm of the difference of true and false positive rates depends linearly on the logarithm of the number of examples per class.For an individual sample, the gradient norm is predictive of its vulnerability.
6/13/2024