A Neural Framework for Generalized Causal Sensitivity Analysis
2311.16026
0
0
🧠
Abstract
Unobserved confounding is common in many applications, making causal inference from observational data challenging. As a remedy, causal sensitivity analysis is an important tool to draw causal conclusions under unobserved confounding with mathematical guarantees. In this paper, we propose NeuralCSA, a neural framework for generalized causal sensitivity analysis. Unlike previous work, our framework is compatible with (i) a large class of sensitivity models, including the marginal sensitivity model, f-sensitivity models, and Rosenbaum's sensitivity model; (ii) different treatment types (i.e., binary and continuous); and (iii) different causal queries, including (conditional) average treatment effects and simultaneous effects on multiple outcomes. The generality of NeuralCSA is achieved by learning a latent distribution shift that corresponds to a treatment intervention using two conditional normalizing flows. We provide theoretical guarantees that NeuralCSA is able to infer valid bounds on the causal query of interest and also demonstrate this empirically using both simulated and real-world data.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Unobserved confounding makes inferring causal relationships from observational data challenging
- Causal sensitivity analysis can help draw causal conclusions under unobserved confounding
- This paper proposes NeuralCSA, a neural framework for generalized causal sensitivity analysis
Plain English Explanation
Inferring causal relationships from real-world data can be difficult because there may be hidden factors that influence both the cause and the effect, a problem known as unobserved confounding. This makes it hard to determine whether changes in one variable truly caused changes in another.
To address this, the researchers developed a method called NeuralCSA, which stands for "Neural Causal Sensitivity Analysis." NeuralCSA is a flexible framework that can perform causal sensitivity analysis - a technique that allows you to draw conclusions about causal relationships even when there are unobserved confounding factors.
Unlike previous approaches, NeuralCSA can handle a wide variety of sensitivity models, different types of treatments (binary or continuous), and different causal questions (like average treatment effects or simultaneous effects on multiple outcomes). This flexibility is achieved by using a technique called "conditional normalizing flows" to learn a latent distribution shift corresponding to a treatment intervention.
The key benefit of NeuralCSA is that it can provide mathematical guarantees about the validity of the causal conclusions, while also demonstrating its effectiveness on both simulated and real-world data.
Technical Explanation
At the heart of NeuralCSA is the use of conditional normalizing flows to model a latent distribution shift that corresponds to a treatment intervention. This allows the framework to handle a wide range of sensitivity models, treatment types, and causal queries.
Specifically, the authors show that NeuralCSA can work with:
- A large class of sensitivity models, including the marginal sensitivity model, f-sensitivity models, and Rosenbaum's sensitivity model
- Both binary and continuous treatment variables
- Different causal queries, such as (conditional) average treatment effects and simultaneous effects on multiple outcomes
The researchers provide theoretical guarantees that NeuralCSA can infer valid bounds on the causal query of interest, and they demonstrate the approach's empirical performance on both simulated and real-world data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and flexible framework for causal sensitivity analysis, addressing many of the limitations of previous approaches. However, the authors do acknowledge some potential caveats:
- The performance of NeuralCSA may depend on the choice of the sensitivity model and the complexity of the data-generating process.
- The method relies on the assumption that the conditional normalizing flows can accurately capture the latent distribution shift, which may not always be the case in practice.
- The computational complexity of NeuralCSA may be higher than some simpler sensitivity analysis methods, especially for large-scale problems.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of NeuralCSA on various datasets, it would be valuable to see further validation on a wider range of real-world applications to better understand the approach's limitations and generalizability.
Conclusion
The NeuralCSA framework presented in this paper is a significant step forward in causal sensitivity analysis, providing a flexible and mathematically-grounded approach to drawing causal conclusions from observational data in the presence of unobserved confounding. By leveraging conditional normalizing flows, the method can handle a diverse set of sensitivity models, treatment types, and causal queries, making it a powerful tool for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding causal relationships in complex systems.
The critical analysis highlights some potential areas for further research, such as exploring the method's performance under different data-generating processes and computational trade-offs. Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of causal inference and provides a promising direction for advancing the state of the art in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Neural Networks with Causal Graph Constraints: A New Approach for Treatment Effects Estimation
Roger Pros, Jordi Vitri`a
0
0
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in using machine learning techniques for the estimation of treatment effects. Most of the best-performing methods rely on representation learning strategies that encourage shared behavior among potential outcomes to increase the precision of treatment effect estimates. In this paper we discuss and classify these models in terms of their algorithmic inductive biases and present a new model, NN-CGC, that considers additional information from the causal graph. NN-CGC tackles bias resulting from spurious variable interactions by implementing novel constraints on models, and it can be integrated with other representation learning methods. We test the effectiveness of our method using three different base models on common benchmarks. Our results indicate that our model constraints lead to significant improvements, achieving new state-of-the-art results in treatment effects estimation. We also show that our method is robust to imperfect causal graphs and that using partial causal information is preferable to ignoring it.
4/19/2024
Generalization Bounds for Causal Regression: Insights, Guarantees and Sensitivity Analysis
Daniel Csillag, Claudio Jos'e Struchiner, Guilherme Tegoni Goedert
0
0
Many algorithms have been recently proposed for causal machine learning. Yet, there is little to no theory on their quality, especially considering finite samples. In this work, we propose a theory based on generalization bounds that provides such guarantees. By introducing a novel change-of-measure inequality, we are able to tightly bound the model loss in terms of the deviation of the treatment propensities over the population, which we show can be empirically limited. Our theory is fully rigorous and holds even in the face of hidden confounding and violations of positivity. We demonstrate our bounds on semi-synthetic and real data, showcasing their remarkable tightness and practical utility.
5/16/2024
🤿
Deep Learning for Causal Inference: A Comparison of Architectures for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation
Demetrios Papakostas, Andrew Herren, P. Richard Hahn, Francisco Castillo
0
0
Causal inference has gained much popularity in recent years, with interests ranging from academic, to industrial, to educational, and all in between. Concurrently, the study and usage of neural networks has also grown profoundly (albeit at a far faster rate). What we aim to do in this blog write-up is demonstrate a Neural Network causal inference architecture. We develop a fully connected neural network implementation of the popular Bayesian Causal Forest algorithm, a state of the art tree based method for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects. We compare our implementation to existing neural network causal inference methodologies, showing improvements in performance in simulation settings. We apply our method to a dataset examining the effect of stress on sleep.
5/7/2024
Uplift Modeling Under Limited Supervision
George Panagopoulos, Daniele Malitesta, Fragkiskos D. Malliaros, Jun Pang
0
0
Estimating causal effects in e-commerce tends to involve costly treatment assignments which can be impractical in large-scale settings. Leveraging machine learning to predict such treatment effects without actual intervention is a standard practice to diminish the risk. However, existing methods for treatment effect prediction tend to rely on training sets of substantial size, which are built from real experiments and are thus inherently risky to create. In this work we propose a graph neural network to diminish the required training set size, relying on graphs that are common in e-commerce data. Specifically, we view the problem as node regression with a restricted number of labeled instances, develop a two-model neural architecture akin to previous causal effect estimators, and test varying message-passing layers for encoding. Furthermore, as an extra step, we combine the model with an acquisition function to guide the creation of the training set in settings with extremely low experimental budget. The framework is flexible since each step can be used separately with other models or treatment policies. The experiments on real large-scale networks indicate a clear advantage of our methodology over the state of the art, which in many cases performs close to random, underlining the need for models that can generalize with limited supervision to reduce experimental risks.
6/10/2024