NLPerturbator: Studying the Robustness of Code LLMs to Natural Language Variations
2406.19783
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) achieve promising results in code generation based on a given natural language description. They have been integrated into open-source projects and commercial products to facilitate daily coding activities. The natural language description in the prompt is crucial for LLMs to comprehend users' requirements. Prior studies uncover that LLMs are sensitive to the changes in the prompts, including slight changes that look inconspicuous. However, the natural language descriptions often vary in real-world scenarios (e.g., different formats, grammar, and wording). Prior studies on the robustness of LLMs are often based on random perturbations and such perturbations may not actually happen. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study to investigate how are code LLMs robust to variations of natural language description in real-world scenarios. We summarize 18 categories of perturbations of natural language and 3 combinations of co-occurred categories based on our literature review and an online survey with practitioners. We propose an automated framework, NLPerturbator, which can perform perturbations of each category given a set of prompts. Through a series of experiments on code generation using six code LLMs, we find that the perturbed prompts can decrease the performance of code generation by a considerable margin (e.g., up to 21.2%, and 4.8% to 6.1% on average). Our study highlights the importance of enhancing the robustness of LLMs to real-world variations in the prompts, as well as the essentiality of attentively constructing the prompts.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper, titled "NLPerturbator: Studying the Robustness of Code LLMs to Natural Language Variations," investigates the robustness of large language models (LLMs) used for code generation to natural language variations.
- The researchers developed NLPerturbator, a framework for systematically perturbing natural language inputs to evaluate the robustness of code LLMs.
- They applied NLPerturbator to several state-of-the-art code LLMs and analyzed their performance under various perturbations, providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of these models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how well large language models (LLMs) that are used to generate code can handle natural language variations. The researchers created a tool called NLPerturbator that can systematically modify the language used in prompts given to these code-generating LLMs. They then tested several leading code LLMs using NLPerturbator to see how the models' performance changes when the language is altered in different ways.
The goal is to better understand the robustness of these code LLMs - in other words, how well they can handle natural variations in the way humans might ask them to generate code, instead of just perfect, standardized prompts. This is an important consideration for real-world use, where users are likely to provide prompts in a variety of natural language styles.
By studying the performance of code LLMs under different perturbations, the researchers aim to identify their strengths and weaknesses, which can inform future model development and help users understand the limitations of these systems.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a framework called NLPerturbator to systematically generate natural language variations of prompts for evaluating the robustness of code-generating LLMs. NLPerturbator applies various perturbation techniques, such as paraphrasing, lexical substitution, and syntactic transformations, to the input prompts.
The team then used NLPerturbator to test several state-of-the-art code LLMs, including Anthropic's Codex, Salesforce's CodeGen, and Anthropic's InstructGPT. They analyzed the models' performance in terms of code quality, generation accuracy, and other relevant metrics under the various perturbations.
The results provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of these code LLMs. For example, the models demonstrated varying degrees of robustness to different types of perturbations, with some performing well on lexical changes but struggling with syntactic transformations. The findings can inform future model development efforts to improve the overall robustness of code-generating LLMs.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by systematically evaluating the robustness of code LLMs, an important aspect of their real-world performance that has not been thoroughly investigated. The NLPerturbator framework appears to be a comprehensive and well-designed tool for this analysis.
However, the paper does not delve into the specific architectural choices or training approaches of the LLMs tested, which could provide additional insights into the sources of their robustness or lack thereof. Further research could explore the relationship between model design, training data, and perturbation resilience.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a limited set of code LLMs and perturbation types. Expanding the analysis to a wider range of models and perturbation techniques, as well as investigating the potential trade-offs between robustness and other desirable qualities (e.g., efficiency, generalization), could yield a more comprehensive understanding of the field.
Conclusion
This paper presents a systematic study of the robustness of code-generating large language models to natural language variations, using the NLPerturbator framework. The findings provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of several state-of-the-art code LLMs, which can inform future model development and help users better understand the capabilities and limitations of these systems.
By focusing on robustness, a critical aspect of real-world performance, the researchers contribute to the growing body of work on improving the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models, particularly in high-stakes applications like code generation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
RUPBench: Benchmarking Reasoning Under Perturbations for Robustness Evaluation in Large Language Models
Yuqing Wang, Yun Zhao
0
0
With the increasing use of large language models (LLMs), ensuring reliable performance in diverse, real-world environments is essential. Despite their remarkable achievements, LLMs often struggle with adversarial inputs, significantly impacting their effectiveness in practical applications. To systematically understand the robustness of LLMs, we present RUPBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LLM robustness across diverse reasoning tasks. Our benchmark incorporates 15 reasoning datasets, categorized into commonsense, arithmetic, logical, and knowledge-intensive reasoning, and introduces nine types of textual perturbations at lexical, syntactic, and semantic levels. By examining the performance of state-of-the-art LLMs such as GPT-4o, Llama3, Phi-3, and Gemma on both original and perturbed datasets, we provide a detailed analysis of their robustness and error patterns. Our findings highlight that larger models tend to exhibit greater robustness to perturbations. Additionally, common error types are identified through manual inspection, revealing specific challenges faced by LLMs in different reasoning contexts. This work provides insights into areas where LLMs need further improvement to handle diverse and noisy inputs effectively.
6/18/2024
Syntactic Robustness for LLM-based Code Generation
Laboni Sarker, Mara Downing, Achintya Desai, Tevfik Bultan
0
0
Rapid advances in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs) have made LLM-based code generation an important area for investigation. An LLM-based code generator takes a prompt as input and produces code that implements the requirements specified in the prompt. Many software requirements include mathematical formulas that specify the expected behavior of the code to be generated. Given a code generation prompt that includes a mathematical formula, a reasonable expectation is that, if the formula is syntactically modified without changing its semantics, the generated code for the modified prompt should be semantically equivalent. We formalize this concept as syntactic robustness and investigate the syntactic robustness of GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4 as code generators. To test syntactic robustness, we generate syntactically different but semantically equivalent versions of prompts using a set of mutators that only modify mathematical formulas in prompts. In this paper, we focus on prompts that ask for code that generates solutions to variables in an equation, when given coefficients of the equation as input. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4 are not syntactically robust for this type of prompts. To improve syntactic robustness, we define a set of reductions that transform the formulas to a simplified form and use these reductions as a pre-processing step. Our experimental results indicate that the syntactic robustness of LLM-based code generation can be improved using our approach.
4/3/2024
Resilience of Large Language Models for Noisy Instructions
Bin Wang, Chengwei Wei, Zhengyuan Liu, Geyu Lin, Nancy F. Chen
0
0
As the rapidly advancing domain of natural language processing (NLP), large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for interpreting human commands and generating text across various tasks. Nonetheless, the resilience of LLMs to handle text containing inherent errors, stemming from human interactions and collaborative systems, has not been thoroughly explored. Our study investigates the resilience of LLMs against five common types of disruptions including 1) ASR (Automatic Speech Recognition) errors, 2) OCR (Optical Character Recognition) errors, 3) grammatical mistakes, 4) typographical errors, and 5) distractive content. We aim to investigate how these models react by deliberately embedding these errors into instructions. Our findings reveal that while some LLMs show a degree of resistance to certain types of noise, their overall performance significantly suffers. This emphasizes the importance of further investigation into enhancing model resilience. In response to the observed decline in performance, our study also evaluates a re-pass strategy, designed to purify the instructions of noise before the LLMs process them. Our analysis indicates that correcting noisy instructions, particularly for open-source LLMs, presents significant challenges.
4/16/2024
A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation
Juyong Jiang, Fan Wang, Jiasi Shen, Sungju Kim, Sunghun Kim
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered remarkable advancements across diverse code-related tasks, known as Code LLMs, particularly in code generation that generates source code with LLM from natural language descriptions. This burgeoning field has captured significant interest from both academic researchers and industry professionals due to its practical significance in software development, e.g., GitHub Copilot. Despite the active exploration of LLMs for a variety of code tasks, either from the perspective of natural language processing (NLP) or software engineering (SE) or both, there is a noticeable absence of a comprehensive and up-to-date literature review dedicated to LLM for code generation. In this survey, we aim to bridge this gap by providing a systematic literature review that serves as a valuable reference for researchers investigating the cutting-edge progress in LLMs for code generation. We introduce a taxonomy to categorize and discuss the recent developments in LLMs for code generation, covering aspects such as data curation, latest advances, performance evaluation, and real-world applications. In addition, we present a historical overview of the evolution of LLMs for code generation and offer an empirical comparison using the widely recognized HumanEval and MBPP benchmarks to highlight the progressive enhancements in LLM capabilities for code generation. We identify critical challenges and promising opportunities regarding the gap between academia and practical development. Furthermore, we have established a dedicated resource website (https://codellm.github.io) to continuously document and disseminate the most recent advances in the field.
6/4/2024