Nonparametric inference of higher order interaction patterns in networks
2403.15635
0
0
Abstract
We propose a method for obtaining parsimonious decompositions of networks into higher order interactions which can take the form of arbitrary motifs.The method is based on a class of analytically solvable generative models, where vertices are connected via explicit copies of motifs, which in combination with non-parametric priors allow us to infer higher order interactions from dyadic graph data without any prior knowledge on the types or frequencies of such interactions. Crucially, we also consider 'degree--corrected' models that correctly reflect the degree distribution of the network and consequently prove to be a better fit for many real world--networks compared to non-degree corrected models. We test the presented approach on simulated data for which we recover the set of underlying higher order interactions to a high degree of accuracy. For empirical networks the method identifies concise sets of atomic subgraphs from within thousands of candidates that cover a large fraction of edges and include higher order interactions of known structural and functional significance. The method not only produces an explicit higher order representation of the network but also a fit of the network to analytically tractable models opening new avenues for the systematic study of higher order network structures.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a nonparametric method for inferring higher-order interaction patterns in networks.
- The approach allows for the detection of complex relationships between nodes in a network that go beyond simple pairwise connections.
- The method does not rely on any assumptions about the underlying network structure, making it widely applicable.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on both synthetic and real-world network data.
Plain English Explanation
Networks are all around us, from social media connections to biological systems. Traditionally, researchers have focused on understanding the pairwise relationships between nodes (e.g., people, proteins) in these networks. However, many real-world networks exhibit complex, higher-order interactions that cannot be fully captured by just looking at pairs of nodes.
Imagine a social network where a group of friends regularly gets together. The relationships between any two individuals in the group don't tell the whole story - the dynamics and interactions within the entire group are important. Similarly, in a biological network, the way multiple genes or proteins work together can reveal crucial insights that go beyond just looking at pairs.
The method presented in this paper provides a way to uncover these higher-order interaction patterns in networks without making any assumptions about the underlying structure. It works by examining the statistical properties of the network data and identifying significant patterns that cannot be explained by simpler, pairwise interactions alone.
By applying this approach, researchers can gain a richer understanding of the complex relationships and dynamics within networks, which could lead to important discoveries in fields like social science, biology, and beyond.
Technical Explanation
The key idea behind the proposed method is to use a nonparametric statistical framework to detect higher-order interaction patterns in network data. Specifically, the authors introduce a test statistic that captures the extent to which the observed network structure deviates from what would be expected under a null model of independent pairwise connections.
The null model is constructed using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling approach, which generates random networks that preserve the observed degree distribution of the original network. By comparing the test statistic computed on the observed network to the distribution of test statistics obtained from the null model samples, the authors can identify statistically significant higher-order patterns.
The method is evaluated on both synthetic and real-world network datasets, demonstrating its ability to detect complex interaction structures that cannot be captured by standard pairwise analyses. For example, the authors show how their approach can uncover higher-order motifs in social networks and reveal biologically relevant interaction modules in protein-protein interaction networks.
Critical Analysis
One of the key strengths of this approach is its nonparametric nature, which allows it to be applied to a wide range of network types without making restrictive assumptions about the underlying structure. This flexibility is particularly valuable in domains where the network properties may not be well-understood a priori.
That said, the authors acknowledge that the computational complexity of the method can be a limitation, as the MCMC sampling process can be time-consuming for large networks. Additionally, the interpretation of the detected higher-order patterns may not always be straightforward, and further investigation may be required to uncover the underlying mechanisms driving these interactions.
It would also be interesting to see how this approach compares to other recently proposed methods for higher-order network analysis, such as those based on simplicial complexes or hypergraphs. A more comprehensive comparison could help researchers better understand the relative strengths and weaknesses of different techniques in this rapidly evolving field.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel nonparametric approach for inferring higher-order interaction patterns in networks. By going beyond pairwise relationships, the method offers a more holistic view of the complex dynamics underlying real-world network systems. The demonstrated applications in social and biological domains suggest that this technique could lead to important new insights and discoveries across a wide range of disciplines.
As networks continue to play an increasingly central role in our understanding of the world, tools like the one described in this paper will become increasingly valuable for uncovering the hidden structures and mechanisms that shape the behavior of complex systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
The temporal dynamics of group interactions in higher-order social networks
Iacopo Iacopini, M'arton Karsai, Alain Barrat
0
0
Representing social systems as networks, starting from the interactions between individuals, sheds light on the mechanisms governing their dynamics. However, networks encode only pairwise interactions, while most social interactions occur among groups of individuals, requiring higher-order network representations. Despite the recent interest in higher-order networks, little is known about the mechanisms that govern the formation and evolution of groups, and how people move between groups. Here, we leverage empirical data on social interactions among children and university students to study their temporal dynamics at both individual and group levels, characterising how individuals navigate groups and how groups form and disaggregate. We find robust patterns across contexts and propose a dynamical model that closely reproduces empirical observations. These results represent a further step in understanding social systems, and open up research directions to study the impact of group dynamics on dynamical processes that evolve on top of them.
4/3/2024
🧠
Neural Temporal Point Process for Forecasting Higher Order and Directional Interactions
Tony Gracious, Arman Gupta, Ambedkar Dukkipati
0
0
Real-world systems are made of interacting entities that evolve with time. Creating models that can forecast interactions by learning the dynamics of entities is an important problem in numerous fields. Earlier works used dynamic graph models to achieve this. However, real-world interactions are more complex than pairwise, as they involve more than two entities, and many of these higher-order interactions have directional components. Examples of these can be seen in communication networks such as email exchanges that involve a sender, and multiple recipients, citation networks, where authors draw upon the work of others, and so on. In this paper, we solve the problem of higher-order directed interaction forecasting by proposing a deep neural network-based model textit{Directed HyperNode Temporal Point Process} for directed hyperedge event forecasting, as hyperedge provides a native framework for modeling relationships among the variable number of nodes. Our proposed technique reduces the search space by initially forecasting the nodes at which events will be observed and then forecasting hyperedge sizes and adjacency vectors for the nodes observing events. Based on these, it generates candidate hyperedges, which are then used by a hyperedge predictor to identify the ground truth. To demonstrate the efficiency of our model, we curated five datasets and conducted an extensive empirical study. We believe that this is the first work that solves the problem of forecasting higher-order directional interactions.
4/30/2024
Learning from higher-order statistics, efficiently: hypothesis tests, random features, and neural networks
Eszter Sz'ekely, Lorenzo Bardone, Federica Gerace, Sebastian Goldt
0
0
Neural networks excel at discovering statistical patterns in high-dimensional data sets. In practice, higher-order cumulants, which quantify the non-Gaussian correlations between three or more variables, are particularly important for the performance of neural networks. But how efficient are neural networks at extracting features from higher-order cumulants? We study this question in the spiked cumulant model, where the statistician needs to recover a privileged direction or spike from the order-$pge 4$ cumulants of $d$-dimensional inputs. Existing literature established the presence of a wide statistical-to-computational gap in this problem. We deepen this line of work by finding an exact formula for the likelihood ratio norm which proves that statistical distinguishability requires $ngtrsim d$ samples, while distinguishing the two distributions in polynomial time requires $n gtrsim d^2$ samples for a wide class of algorithms, i.e. those covered by the low-degree conjecture. Numerical experiments show that neural networks do indeed learn to distinguish the two distributions with quadratic sample complexity, while lazy methods like random features are not better than random guessing in this regime. Our results show that neural networks extract information from higher-ordercorrelations in the spiked cumulant model efficiently, and reveal a large gap in the amount of data required by neural networks and random features to learn from higher-order cumulants.
6/7/2024
🤯
Degree Heterogeneity in Higher-Order Networks: Inference in the Hypergraph $boldsymbol{beta}$-Model
Sagnik Nandy, Bhaswar B. Bhattacharya
0
0
The $boldsymbol{beta}$-model for random graphs is commonly used for representing pairwise interactions in a network with degree heterogeneity. Going beyond pairwise interactions, Stasi et al. (2014) introduced the hypergraph $boldsymbol{beta}$-model for capturing degree heterogeneity in networks with higher-order (multi-way) interactions. In this paper we initiate the rigorous study of the hypergraph $boldsymbol{beta}$-model with multiple layers, which allows for hyperedges of different sizes across the layers. To begin with, we derive the rates of convergence of the maximum likelihood (ML) estimate and establish their minimax rate optimality. We also derive the limiting distribution of the ML estimate and construct asymptotically valid confidence intervals for the model parameters. Next, we consider the goodness-of-fit problem in the hypergraph $boldsymbol{beta}$-model. Specifically, we establish the asymptotic normality of the likelihood ratio (LR) test under the null hypothesis, derive its detection threshold, and also its limiting power at the threshold. Interestingly, the detection threshold of the LR test turns out to be minimax optimal, that is, all tests are asymptotically powerless below this threshold. The theoretical results are further validated in numerical experiments. In addition to developing the theoretical framework for estimation and inference for hypergraph $boldsymbol{beta}$-models, the above results fill a number of gaps in the graph $boldsymbol{beta}$-model literature, such as the minimax optimality of the ML estimates and the non-null properties of the LR test, which, to the best of our knowledge, have not been studied before.
6/7/2024