Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Minimizing Residual Loss with Wide Networks and Effective Activations
2405.01680
0
0
Abstract
The residual loss in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) alters the simple recursive relation of layers in a feed-forward neural network by applying a differential operator, resulting in a loss landscape that is inherently different from those of common supervised problems. Therefore, relying on the existing theory leads to unjustified design choices and suboptimal performance. In this work, we analyze the residual loss by studying its characteristics at critical points to find the conditions that result in effective training of PINNs. Specifically, we first show that under certain conditions, the residual loss of PINNs can be globally minimized by a wide neural network. Furthermore, our analysis also reveals that an activation function with well-behaved high-order derivatives plays a crucial role in minimizing the residual loss. In particular, to solve a $k$-th order PDE, the $k$-th derivative of the activation function should be bijective. The established theory paves the way for designing and choosing effective activation functions for PINNs and explains why periodic activations have shown promising performance in certain cases. Finally, we verify our findings by conducting a set of experiments on several PDEs. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/nimahsn/pinns_tf2.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel approach to improving the performance of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), which are a type of machine learning model used to solve partial differential equations (PDEs).
- The key innovations include using wider neural network architectures and novel activation functions to minimize the residual loss, which is a measure of how well the neural network satisfies the underlying PDE.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark PDE problems, showing that it can achieve state-of-the-art results compared to previous PINN methods.
Plain English Explanation
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a powerful tool for solving complex mathematical equations known as partial differential equations (PDEs). These equations are used to model a wide range of physical phenomena, from fluid dynamics to heat transfer. However, training PINNs can be challenging, as they need to satisfy the constraints of the underlying PDE in addition to fitting the available data.
This paper presents a new way to improve the performance of PINNs by using wider neural network architectures and novel activation functions. The key idea is to minimize the "residual loss" - a measure of how well the neural network satisfies the PDE. By using wider networks and effective activation functions, the authors show that they can achieve better results on several benchmark PDE problems compared to previous PINN methods.
The wider networks provide the model with more flexibility to accurately capture the complex relationships in the data, while the new activation functions help the network learn the PDE constraints more effectively. This combination of architectural and algorithmic innovations results in state-of-the-art performance on a range of PDE problems, demonstrating the potential of this approach for real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The authors propose two main innovations to improve the performance of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs):
-
Wide Network Architectures: The authors hypothesize that using wider neural network architectures, with more hidden units per layer, can better capture the complex relationships in PDE problems. They experiment with various widths and show that wider networks consistently outperform their narrower counterparts.
-
Effective Activation Functions: The authors investigate the use of different activation functions, such as the Softplus and Swish functions, to better satisfy the constraints of the underlying PDE. They demonstrate that these novel activations can lead to faster convergence and lower residual loss compared to the standard ReLU activation.
The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark PDE problems, including the Poisson, Burgers', and Allen-Cahn equations. They show that their proposed wide networks with effective activations can achieve state-of-the-art performance, with lower residual losses and faster convergence compared to previous PINN methods.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough evaluation of their proposed approach, including extensive comparisons to previous PINN methods on a range of benchmark problems. The wide network architectures and novel activation functions appear to be effective in improving the performance of PINNs, as demonstrated by the reported results.
However, the paper does not address the potential computational and memory overhead associated with using wider networks. As the network size increases, the training and inference time may also increase, which could be a limitation for real-world applications with tight computational constraints.
Additionally, the authors do not explore the generalization capabilities of their approach beyond the specific benchmark problems presented. It would be valuable to see how the proposed methods perform on a broader range of PDE problems, including those with more complex geometry or multi-physics couplings.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an innovative approach to enhancing the performance of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) by using wider network architectures and effective activation functions. The authors demonstrate that these architectural and algorithmic improvements can lead to significant reductions in residual loss and faster convergence on several benchmark PDE problems.
The findings of this research suggest that careful design of the neural network structure and activation functions can play a crucial role in the success of PINN-based methods for solving complex partial differential equations. The proposed techniques have the potential to unlock new applications and improve the reliability of PINN models in fields ranging from fluid dynamics to material science.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š ļø
Unveiling the optimization process of Physics Informed Neural Networks: How accurate and competitive can PINNs be?
Jorge F. Urb'an, Petros Stefanou, Jos'e A. Pons
0
0
This study investigates the potential accuracy boundaries of physics-informed neural networks, contrasting their approach with previous similar works and traditional numerical methods. We find that selecting improved optimization algorithms significantly enhances the accuracy of the results. Simple modifications to the loss function may also improve precision, offering an additional avenue for enhancement. Despite optimization algorithms having a greater impact on convergence than adjustments to the loss function, practical considerations often favor tweaking the latter due to ease of implementation. On a global scale, the integration of an enhanced optimizer and a marginally adjusted loss function enables a reduction in the loss function by several orders of magnitude across diverse physical problems. Consequently, our results obtained using compact networks (typically comprising 2 or 3 layers of 20-30 neurons) achieve accuracies comparable to finite difference schemes employing thousands of grid points. This study encourages the continued advancement of PINNs and associated optimization techniques for broader applications across various fields.
5/8/2024
š
Data vs. Physics: The Apparent Pareto Front of Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Franz M. Rohrhofer, Stefan Posch, Clemens Go{ss}nitzer, Bernhard C. Geiger
0
0
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising deep learning method, capable of solving forward and inverse problems governed by differential equations. Despite their recent advance, it is widely acknowledged that PINNs are difficult to train and often require a careful tuning of loss weights when data and physics loss functions are combined by scalarization of a multi-objective (MO) problem. In this paper, we aim to understand how parameters of the physical system, such as characteristic length and time scales, the computational domain, and coefficients of differential equations affect MO optimization and the optimal choice of loss weights. Through a theoretical examination of where these system parameters appear in PINN training, we find that they effectively and individually scale the loss residuals, causing imbalances in MO optimization with certain choices of system parameters. The immediate effects of this are reflected in the apparent Pareto front, which we define as the set of loss values achievable with gradient-based training and visualize accordingly. We empirically verify that loss weights can be used successfully to compensate for the scaling of system parameters, and enable the selection of an optimal solution on the apparent Pareto front that aligns well with the physically valid solution. We further demonstrate that by altering the system parameterization, the apparent Pareto front can shift and exhibit locally convex parts, resulting in a wider range of loss weights for which gradient-based training becomes successful. This work explains the effects of system parameters on MO optimization in PINNs, and highlights the utility of proposed loss weighting schemes.
6/11/2024
š§
Efficient Error Certification for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Francisco Eiras, Adel Bibi, Rudy Bunel, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham, Philip Torr, M. Pawan Kumar
0
0
Recent work provides promising evidence that Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) can efficiently solve partial differential equations (PDE). However, previous works have failed to provide guarantees on the worst-case residual error of a PINN across the spatio-temporal domain - a measure akin to the tolerance of numerical solvers - focusing instead on point-wise comparisons between their solution and the ones obtained by a solver on a set of inputs. In real-world applications, one cannot consider tests on a finite set of points to be sufficient grounds for deployment, as the performance could be substantially worse on a different set. To alleviate this issue, we establish guaranteed error-based conditions for PINNs over their continuous applicability domain. To verify the extent to which they hold, we introduce $partial$-CROWN: a general, efficient and scalable post-training framework to bound PINN residual errors. We demonstrate its effectiveness in obtaining tight certificates by applying it to two classically studied PINNs - Burgers' and Schrodinger's equations -, and two more challenging ones with real-world applications - the Allan-Cahn and Diffusion-Sorption equations.
5/30/2024
Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspective
Pratik Rathore, Weimu Lei, Zachary Frangella, Lu Lu, Madeleine Udell
0
0
This paper explores challenges in training Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), emphasizing the role of the loss landscape in the training process. We examine difficulties in minimizing the PINN loss function, particularly due to ill-conditioning caused by differential operators in the residual term. We compare gradient-based optimizers Adam, L-BFGS, and their combination Adam+L-BFGS, showing the superiority of Adam+L-BFGS, and introduce a novel second-order optimizer, NysNewton-CG (NNCG), which significantly improves PINN performance. Theoretically, our work elucidates the connection between ill-conditioned differential operators and ill-conditioning in the PINN loss and shows the benefits of combining first- and second-order optimization methods. Our work presents valuable insights and more powerful optimization strategies for training PINNs, which could improve the utility of PINNs for solving difficult partial differential equations.
6/5/2024