Physics-informed neural networks for operator equations with stochastic data

2211.10344

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/7/2024 by Paul Escapil-Inchausp'e, Gonzalo A. Ruz

🧠

Abstract

We consider the computation of statistical moments to operator equations with stochastic data. We remark that application of PINNs -- referred to as TPINNs -- allows to solve the induced tensor operator equations under minimal changes of existing PINNs code, and enabling handling of non-linear and time-dependent operators. We propose two types of architectures, referred to as vanilla and multi-output TPINNs, and investigate their benefits and limitations. Exhaustive numerical experiments are performed; demonstrating applicability and performance; raising a variety of new promising research avenues.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the computation of statistical moments in operator equations with stochastic data.
  • It introduces Tensor Physics-Informed Neural Networks (TPINNs), an extension of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), to solve the induced tensor operator equations.
  • The paper proposes two TPINN architectures, "vanilla" and "multi-output," and investigates their benefits and limitations.
  • Extensive numerical experiments are conducted, demonstrating the applicability and performance of the proposed approaches, and identifying new research directions.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a way to solve a specific type of mathematical problem involving uncertainty, using a machine learning technique called neural networks.

The problem involves "operator equations," which are a way of modeling complex systems that can change over time. In this case, the equations have some elements that are not known for certain, but are instead described by statistical properties.

The researchers introduce a new type of neural network called a "Tensor Physics-Informed Neural Network" (or TPINN for short) that can handle these uncertain elements. TPINNs build on an existing technique called PINNs, but extend it to work with more complex, time-varying systems.

The paper presents two different TPINN architectures, and tests them out through extensive numerical experiments. The results show that TPINNs can effectively solve these operator equation problems, and also point to new research directions that could be explored further.

The key idea is to use machine learning to tackle mathematical problems that involve both known physical laws and unknown or uncertain elements. This allows for more realistic modeling of complex systems in fields like engineering and physics.

Technical Explanation

The paper addresses the challenge of computing statistical moments (e.g., mean, variance) in operator equations with stochastic data. To solve this problem, the authors propose the use of Tensor Physics-Informed Neural Networks (TPINNs), which extend the Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework to handle non-linear and time-dependent operator equations.

The key innovation is that TPINNs can solve the induced tensor operator equations with minimal changes to existing PINN code. This enables the handling of more complex systems compared to standard PINNs.

The paper introduces two TPINN architectures: "vanilla" and "multi-output" TPINNs. The vanilla approach uses a single neural network to approximate the entire solution, while the multi-output version employs multiple neural networks to capture different statistical moments separately.

Through extensive numerical experiments, the authors demonstrate the applicability and performance of the proposed TPINN approaches. The results highlight the benefits and limitations of each architecture, and suggest several promising directions for future research, such as data-driven changepoint detection, tensor-driven acceleration, and physics-informed neural networks for volumetric sound field modeling.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to solving operator equations with stochastic data using TPINNs. The authors have carefully designed and evaluated the two TPINN architectures, providing valuable insights into their strengths and limitations.

One potential limitation of the research is the focus on numerical experiments, which may not fully capture the real-world complexities and challenges that could arise when applying TPINNs to more practical problems. The paper does not discuss the scalability of the proposed methods or their sensitivity to factors such as data quality, noise, and the choice of hyperparameters.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed comparison of TPINNs with other machine learning or numerical methods that could be used to solve similar operator equation problems. Such a comparison would help readers better understand the relative advantages and disadvantages of the TPINN approach.

Despite these potential limitations, the paper makes a significant contribution to the field of physics-informed machine learning by extending the PINN framework to handle more complex, non-linear, and time-dependent operator equations. The insights and directions for future research identified in the paper are valuable and could inspire further advancements in this area.

Conclusion

The paper introduces Tensor Physics-Informed Neural Networks (TPINNs), a novel extension of the Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework, to solve operator equations with stochastic data. The proposed TPINN architectures, including the "vanilla" and "multi-output" versions, demonstrate the ability to handle non-linear and time-dependent operators with minimal changes to existing PINN code.

The extensive numerical experiments conducted in the paper showcase the applicability and performance of TPINNs, while also highlighting various promising research avenues, such as data-driven changepoint detection, tensor-driven acceleration, and physics-informed neural networks for volumetric sound field modeling.

Overall, the paper makes a significant contribution to the field of physics-informed machine learning, providing a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working on complex, stochastic systems in various domains, such as engineering, physics, and applied mathematics.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🧠

Physics-informed Neural Networks with Unknown Measurement Noise

Philipp Pilar, Niklas Wahlstrom

YC

0

Reddit

0

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) constitute a flexible approach to both finding solutions and identifying parameters of partial differential equations. Most works on the topic assume noiseless data, or data contaminated with weak Gaussian noise. We show that the standard PINN framework breaks down in case of non-Gaussian noise. We give a way of resolving this fundamental issue and we propose to jointly train an energy-based model (EBM) to learn the correct noise distribution. We illustrate the improved performance of our approach using multiple examples.

Read more

6/21/2024

🧠

Conformalized Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Lena Podina, Mahdi Torabi Rad, Mohammad Kohandel

YC

0

Reddit

0

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are an influential method of solving differential equations and estimating their parameters given data. However, since they make use of neural networks, they provide only a point estimate of differential equation parameters, as well as the solution at any given point, without any measure of uncertainty. Ensemble and Bayesian methods have been previously applied to quantify the uncertainty of PINNs, but these methods may require making strong assumptions on the data-generating process, and can be computationally expensive. Here, we introduce Conformalized PINNs (C-PINNs) that, without making any additional assumptions, utilize the framework of conformal prediction to quantify the uncertainty of PINNs by providing intervals that have finite-sample, distribution-free statistical validity.

Read more

5/15/2024

VS-PINN: A Fast and efficient training of physics-informed neural networks using variable-scaling methods for solving PDEs with stiff behavior

VS-PINN: A Fast and efficient training of physics-informed neural networks using variable-scaling methods for solving PDEs with stiff behavior

Seungchan Ko, Sang Hyeon Park

YC

0

Reddit

0

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising way to compute the solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs) using deep neural networks. However, despite their significant success in various fields, it remains unclear in many aspects how to effectively train PINNs if the solutions of PDEs exhibit stiff behaviors or high frequencies. In this paper, we propose a new method for training PINNs using variable-scaling techniques. This method is simple and it can be applied to a wide range of problems including PDEs with rapidly-varying solutions. Throughout various numerical experiments, we will demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for these problems and confirm that it can significantly improve the training efficiency and performance of PINNs. Furthermore, based on the analysis of the neural tangent kernel (NTK), we will provide theoretical evidence for this phenomenon and show that our methods can indeed improve the performance of PINNs.

Read more

6/11/2024

🧠

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Dynamic Process Operations with Limited Physical Knowledge and Data

Mehmet Velioglu, Song Zhai, Sophia Rupprecht, Alexander Mitsos, Andreas Jupke, Manuel Dahmen

YC

0

Reddit

0

In chemical engineering, process data is often expensive to acquire, and complex phenomena are difficult to model rigorously, rendering both entirely data-driven and purely mechanistic modeling approaches impractical. We explore using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for modeling dynamic processes governed by differential-algebraic equation systems when process data is scarce and complete mechanistic knowledge is missing. In particular, we focus on estimating states for which neither direct observational data nor constitutive equations are available. For demonstration purposes, we study a continuously stirred tank reactor and a liquid-liquid separator. We find that PINNs can infer unmeasured states with reasonable accuracy, and they generalize better in low-data scenarios than purely data-driven models. We thus show that PINNs, similar to hybrid mechanistic/data-driven models, are capable of modeling processes when relatively few experimental data and only partially known mechanistic descriptions are available, and conclude that they constitute a promising avenue that warrants further investigation.

Read more

6/4/2024