PlagBench: Exploring the Duality of Large Language Models in Plagiarism Generation and Detection
2406.16288
0
0
Abstract
Recent literature has highlighted potential risks to academic integrity associated with large language models (LLMs), as they can memorize parts of training instances and reproduce them in the generated texts without proper attribution. In addition, given their capabilities in generating high-quality texts, plagiarists can exploit LLMs to generate realistic paraphrases or summaries indistinguishable from original work. In response to possible malicious use of LLMs in plagiarism, we introduce PlagBench, a comprehensive dataset consisting of 46.5K synthetic plagiarism cases generated using three instruction-tuned LLMs across three writing domains. The quality of PlagBench is ensured through fine-grained automatic evaluation for each type of plagiarism, complemented by human annotation. We then leverage our proposed dataset to evaluate the plagiarism detection performance of five modern LLMs and three specialized plagiarism checkers. Our findings reveal that GPT-3.5 tends to generates paraphrases and summaries of higher quality compared to Llama2 and GPT-4. Despite LLMs' weak performance in summary plagiarism identification, they can surpass current commercial plagiarism detectors. Overall, our results highlight the potential of LLMs to serve as robust plagiarism detection tools.
Create account to get full access
Introduction
The paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) in both plagiarism generation and detection. The authors introduce <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/focus-forging-originality-through-contrastive-use-self">PlagBench</a>, a framework for evaluating the duality of LLMs in these two tasks. The paper examines how LLMs can be leveraged to generate high-quality plagiarized content, as well as how they can be used to detect such generated text. The authors' key insight is that the same underlying language modeling capabilities that enable plagiarism generation can also be harnessed for plagiarism detection, highlighting the dual-edged nature of these powerful AI models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses how large language models, which are advanced AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, can be used for both generating plagiarized content and detecting it. The authors have developed a framework called <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/focus-forging-originality-through-contrastive-use-self">PlagBench</a> to study this dual capability of language models.
On one hand, these language models can be used to create high-quality plagiarized text, essentially mimicking and rewriting existing content in a way that can be difficult to detect. This raises concerns about the potential for misuse and the erosion of originality in written work.
On the other hand, the same language modeling capabilities that enable plagiarism generation can also be leveraged for plagiarism detection. By understanding the patterns and characteristics of machine-generated text, researchers can develop tools to identify and flag plagiarized content.
The key insight here is that the same underlying technology, when used in different ways, can have both positive and negative implications. This duality highlights the need for careful consideration and responsible development of these powerful AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/focus-forging-originality-through-contrastive-use-self">PlagBench</a>, a framework for evaluating the dual capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in plagiarism generation and detection. The authors demonstrate how the same language modeling capabilities that enable LLMs to generate high-quality plagiarized content can also be leveraged for plagiarism detection.
The paper presents various experiments exploring the plagiarism generation and detection capabilities of LLMs. For plagiarism generation, the authors fine-tune LLMs on plagiarized text samples to assess their ability to generate convincing plagiarized content. For plagiarism detection, they investigate the use of LLMs to identify machine-generated text and distinguish it from human-written content.
The findings reveal the dual-edged nature of LLMs, highlighting both the potential for misuse in plagiarism generation and the opportunity for developing effective plagiarism detection tools. The authors discuss the implications of their work, emphasizing the need for responsible development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important concerns about the potential misuse of large language models in generating plagiarized content. While the authors demonstrate the capability of LLMs to create convincing plagiarized text, they also acknowledge the limitations of their approach and the need for further research.
One key limitation mentioned is the quality of the plagiarized content generated by the LLMs, which may not always be indistinguishable from human-written text. Additionally, the authors note that their plagiarism detection experiments were conducted on a limited dataset and may not generalize to real-world scenarios.
Further research is needed to explore more advanced techniques for both plagiarism generation and detection. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/investigating-translation-capabilities-large-language-models-trained">Investigating the translation capabilities of LLMs</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-models-reflect-human-citation-patterns">understanding how LLMs reflect human citation patterns</a> could provide valuable insights for this field.
Moreover, the authors acknowledge the need for the responsible development and deployment of LLMs, as these technologies can have significant societal implications. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/exploring-latest-llms-leaderboard-extraction">Exploring the latest LLM leaderboard extractions</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/efficient-detection-llm-generated-texts-bayesian-surrogate">efficient detection of LLM-generated texts</a> will be crucial for addressing these challenges.
Conclusion
The paper explores the duality of large language models in plagiarism generation and detection, introducing the <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/focus-forging-originality-through-contrastive-use-self">PlagBench</a> framework. The authors demonstrate how the same underlying language modeling capabilities that enable LLMs to generate high-quality plagiarized content can also be harnessed for plagiarism detection.
This duality highlights the need for careful consideration and responsible development of these powerful AI systems. While the potential for misuse in plagiarism generation is concerning, the authors also identify opportunities for leveraging LLMs to combat plagiarism and maintain the integrity of written work.
The findings of this paper have important implications for the future of AI-powered text generation and the ongoing efforts to ensure the trustworthiness and ethical use of these technologies. As LLMs continue to advance, the research community and policymakers will need to work together to address the challenges and harness the potential of these transformative tools.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
FOCUS: Forging Originality through Contrastive Use in Self-Plagiarism for Language Models
Kaixin Lan, Tao Fang, Derek F. Wong, Yabo Xu, Lidia S. Chao, Cecilia G. Zhao
0
0
Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) have shown impressive results in various Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks, such as powering chatbots and generating stories. However, an ethical concern arises due to their potential to produce verbatim copies of paragraphs from their training data. This is problematic as PLMs are trained on corpora constructed by human authors. As such, there is a pressing need for research to promote the generation of original content by these models. In this study, we introduce a unique self-plagiarism contrastive decoding strategy, aimed at boosting the originality of text produced by PLMs. Our method entails modifying prompts in LLMs to develop an amateur model and a professional model. Specifically, the amateur model is urged to plagiarize using three plagiarism templates we have designed, while the professional model maintains its standard language model status. This strategy employs prompts to stimulate the model's capacity to identify non-original candidate token combinations and subsequently impose penalties. The application of this strategy is integrated prior to the model's final layer, ensuring smooth integration with most existing PLMs (T5, GPT, LLaMA) without necessitating further adjustments. Implementing our strategy, we observe a significant decline in non-original sequences comprised of more than three words in the academic AASC dataset and the story-based ROCStories dataset.
6/4/2024
💬
Investigating the translation capabilities of Large Language Models trained on parallel data only
Javier Garc'ia Gilabert, Carlos Escolano, Aleix Sant Savall, Francesca De Luca Fornaciari, Audrey Mash, Xixian Liao, Maite Melero
0
0
In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional proficiency across a broad spectrum of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, including Machine Translation. However, previous methods predominantly relied on iterative processes such as instruction fine-tuning or continual pre-training, leaving unexplored the challenges of training LLMs solely on parallel data. In this work, we introduce PLUME (Parallel Language Model), a collection of three 2B LLMs featuring varying vocabulary sizes (32k, 128k, and 256k) trained exclusively on Catalan-centric parallel examples. These models perform comparably to previous encoder-decoder architectures on 16 supervised translation directions and 56 zero-shot ones. Utilizing this set of models, we conduct a thorough investigation into the translation capabilities of LLMs, probing their performance, the impact of the different elements of the prompt, and their cross-lingual representation space.
6/14/2024
💬
New!Large Language Models as Evaluators for Scientific Synthesis
Julia Evans, Jennifer D'Souza, Soren Auer
0
0
Our study explores how well the state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs), like GPT-4 and Mistral, can assess the quality of scientific summaries or, more fittingly, scientific syntheses, comparing their evaluations to those of human annotators. We used a dataset of 100 research questions and their syntheses made by GPT-4 from abstracts of five related papers, checked against human quality ratings. The study evaluates both the closed-source GPT-4 and the open-source Mistral model's ability to rate these summaries and provide reasons for their judgments. Preliminary results show that LLMs can offer logical explanations that somewhat match the quality ratings, yet a deeper statistical analysis shows a weak correlation between LLM and human ratings, suggesting the potential and current limitations of LLMs in scientific synthesis evaluation.
7/4/2024
Large Language Models Reflect Human Citation Patterns with a Heightened Citation Bias
Andres Algaba, Carmen Mazijn, Vincent Holst, Floriano Tori, Sylvia Wenmackers, Vincent Ginis
0
0
Citation practices are crucial in shaping the structure of scientific knowledge, yet they are often influenced by contemporary norms and biases. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 introduces a new dynamic to these practices. Interestingly, the characteristics and potential biases of references recommended by LLMs that entirely rely on their parametric knowledge, and not on search or retrieval-augmented generation, remain unexplored. Here, we analyze these characteristics in an experiment using a dataset of 166 papers from AAAI, NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR, published after GPT-4's knowledge cut-off date, encompassing 3,066 references in total. In our experiment, GPT-4 was tasked with suggesting scholarly references for the anonymized in-text citations within these papers. Our findings reveal a remarkable similarity between human and LLM citation patterns, but with a more pronounced high citation bias in GPT-4, which persists even after controlling for publication year, title length, number of authors, and venue. Additionally, we observe a large consistency between the characteristics of GPT-4's existing and non-existent generated references, indicating the model's internalization of citation patterns. By analyzing citation graphs, we show that the references recommended by GPT-4 are embedded in the relevant citation context, suggesting an even deeper conceptual internalization of the citation networks. While LLMs can aid in citation generation, they may also amplify existing biases and introduce new ones, potentially skewing scientific knowledge dissemination. Our results underscore the need for identifying the model's biases and for developing balanced methods to interact with LLMs in general.
5/30/2024