Quantifying the Benefit of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research
2304.10578
0
0
✨
Abstract
The ongoing artificial intelligence (AI) revolution has the potential to change almost every line of work. As AI capabilities continue to improve in accuracy, robustness, and reach, AI may outperform and even replace human experts across many valuable tasks. Despite enormous effort devoted to understanding the impact of AI on labor and the economy and AI's recent successes in accelerating scientific discovery and progress, we lack a systematic understanding of how AI advances may benefit scientific research across disciplines and fields. Here, drawing from the literature on the future of work and the science of science, we develop a measurement framework to estimate both the direct use of AI and the potential benefit of AI in scientific research, applying natural language processing techniques to 74.6 million publications and 7.1 million patents. We find that the use of AI in research is widespread throughout the sciences, growing especially rapidly since 2015, and papers that use AI exhibit a citation premium, more likely to be highly cited both within and outside their disciplines. Moreover, our analysis reveals considerable potential for AI to benefit numerous scientific fields, yet a notable disconnect exists between AI education and its research applications, highlighting a mismatch between the supply of AI expertise and its demand in research. Lastly, we examine demographic disparities in AI's benefits across scientific disciplines and find that disciplines with a higher proportion of women or Black scientists tend to be associated with less benefit, suggesting that AI's growing impact on research may further exacerbate existing inequalities in science. As the connection between AI and scientific research deepens, our findings may become increasingly important, with implications for the equity and sustainability of the research enterprise.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines how artificial intelligence (AI) is impacting scientific research across disciplines.
- It develops a framework to measure the direct use of AI in research and the potential benefits of AI for advancing science.
- Key findings include widespread and growing use of AI in research since 2015, a citation premium for papers using AI, and potential for AI to benefit many fields, but also disparities in AI's impact by discipline and demographics.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how the rise of AI is changing scientific research. The researchers created a way to measure two things: 1) how much AI is being used directly in research projects, and 2) the potential ways AI could help advance science in different fields.
They found that the use of AI in research is becoming more and more common, especially since 2015. Papers that use AI tend to get cited more often by other researchers, both within their own field and across disciplines. This suggests AI is helping to drive new scientific discoveries and progress.
However, the researchers also uncovered a mismatch between the supply of AI expertise and the demand for it in research. Many scientific fields could benefit more from AI, but don't have enough people with the right AI skills to take advantage of the opportunities.
Another key finding is that AI's growing impact on research may widen existing inequalities in science. Disciplines with more women or Black scientists tend to see less benefit from AI compared to other fields. This is concerning, as it could further marginalize underrepresented groups in the scientific community.
Overall, the paper highlights both the promise and potential pitfalls of AI's increasing role in research. As the connections between AI and science deepen, the researchers say these findings will become increasingly important for ensuring the research enterprise remains equitable and sustainable.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used natural language processing techniques to analyze 74.6 million research publications and 7.1 million patents. This allowed them to develop a framework for measuring both the direct application of AI in research and the potential benefits AI could provide across different scientific disciplines.
Their analysis revealed that the use of AI in research is widespread and growing rapidly, especially since 2015. Papers that utilize AI exhibit a "citation premium," meaning they are more likely to be highly cited by other researchers, both within their own field and across disciplines. This suggests AI is helping to accelerate scientific discovery and progress.
However, the researchers also identified a notable disconnect between the supply of AI expertise and its demand in research applications. Many scientific fields appear to have considerable potential to benefit from AI's capabilities, but lack the necessary AI skills and knowledge among researchers.
Additionally, the study examined demographic disparities in AI's impact on science. They found that disciplines with a higher proportion of women or Black scientists tended to see less benefit from AI compared to other fields. This raises concerns that AI's growing influence could further exacerbate existing inequalities within the scientific community.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and data-driven assessment of AI's burgeoning role in scientific research. The researchers' measurement framework and analysis of millions of publications and patents offer valuable insights into both the current state and future potential of AI's impact on science.
However, the study does have some limitations. For example, it relies on keyword-based identification of AI-related research, which may miss some indirect or emerging applications of AI. Additionally, the demographic analysis is based on broad disciplinary trends, rather than individual-level data, which could mask more nuanced patterns of inequality.
Further research is needed to better understand the complex interactions between AI, scientific progress, and social equity. Key questions include how to effectively bridge the gap between AI expertise and research needs, and how to ensure that the benefits of AI-driven discovery are distributed equitably across scientific fields and communities.
Nonetheless, this paper represents an important step forward in quantifying and contextualizing AI's growing influence on the scientific enterprise. As the authors note, these findings will likely become increasingly relevant as the connections between AI and research deepen, with significant implications for the future of scientific discovery and its societal impacts.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive assessment of how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming scientific research across disciplines. Through a rigorous data-driven analysis, the researchers found that the use of AI in research is widespread and growing rapidly, with AI-powered studies exhibiting a citation premium that suggests AI is helping to accelerate scientific discovery.
However, the study also uncovered a disconnect between the supply of AI expertise and the demand for it in research applications, as well as concerning disparities in AI's impact across scientific fields, with disciplines having more women or Black scientists seeing less benefit.
As the connections between AI and science deepen, these findings will become increasingly important for ensuring the research enterprise remains equitable and sustainable. Addressing the challenges identified in this paper will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of AI to drive scientific progress that benefits all of society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
The Impact of AI on Academic Research and Publishing
Brady Lund, Manika Lamba, Sang Hoo Oh
0
0
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies like ChatGPT, have significantly impacted academic writing and publishing through their ability to generate content at levels comparable to or surpassing human writers. Through a review of recent interdisciplinary literature, this paper examines ethical considerations surrounding the integration of AI into academia, focusing on the potential for this technology to be used for scholarly misconduct and necessary oversight when using it for writing, editing, and reviewing of scholarly papers. The findings highlight the need for collaborative approaches to AI usage among publishers, editors, reviewers, and authors to ensure that this technology is used ethically and productively.
6/11/2024
AI Knowledge and Reasoning: Emulating Expert Creativity in Scientific Research
Anirban Mukherjee, Hannah Hanwen Chang
0
0
We investigate whether modern AI can emulate expert creativity in complex scientific endeavors. We introduce novel methodology that utilizes original research articles published after the AI's training cutoff, ensuring no prior exposure, mitigating concerns of rote memorization and prior training. The AI are tasked with redacting findings, predicting outcomes from redacted research, and assessing prediction accuracy against reported results. Analysis on 589 published studies in four leading psychology journals over a 28-month period, showcase the AI's proficiency in understanding specialized research, deductive reasoning, and evaluating evidentiary alignment--cognitive hallmarks of human subject matter expertise and creativity. These findings suggest the potential of general-purpose AI to transform academia, with roles requiring knowledge-based creativity become increasingly susceptible to technological substitution.
4/9/2024
🖼️
Opportunities for machine learning in scientific discovery
Ricardo Vinuesa, Jean Rabault, Hossein Azizpour, Stefan Bauer, Bingni W. Brunton, Arne Elofsson, Elias Jarlebring, Hedvig Kjellstrom, Stefano Markidis, David Marlevi, Paola Cinnella, Steven L. Brunton
0
0
Technological advancements have substantially increased computational power and data availability, enabling the application of powerful machine-learning (ML) techniques across various fields. However, our ability to leverage ML methods for scientific discovery, {it i.e.} to obtain fundamental and formalized knowledge about natural processes, is still in its infancy. In this review, we explore how the scientific community can increasingly leverage ML techniques to achieve scientific discoveries. We observe that the applicability and opportunity of ML depends strongly on the nature of the problem domain, and whether we have full ({it e.g.}, turbulence), partial ({it e.g.}, computational biochemistry), or no ({it e.g.}, neuroscience) {it a-priori} knowledge about the governing equations and physical properties of the system. Although challenges remain, principled use of ML is opening up new avenues for fundamental scientific discoveries. Throughout these diverse fields, there is a theme that ML is enabling researchers to embrace complexity in observational data that was previously intractable to classic analysis and numerical investigations.
5/8/2024
Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI
Katja Grace, Harlan Stewart, Julia Fabienne Sandkuhler, Stephen Thomas, Ben Weinstein-Raun, Jan Brauner
0
0
In the largest survey of its kind, 2,778 researchers who had published in top-tier artificial intelligence (AI) venues gave predictions on the pace of AI progress and the nature and impacts of advanced AI systems The aggregate forecasts give at least a 50% chance of AI systems achieving several milestones by 2028, including autonomously constructing a payment processing site from scratch, creating a song indistinguishable from a new song by a popular musician, and autonomously downloading and fine-tuning a large language model. If science continues undisrupted, the chance of unaided machines outperforming humans in every possible task was estimated at 10% by 2027, and 50% by 2047. The latter estimate is 13 years earlier than that reached in a similar survey we conducted only one year earlier [Grace et al., 2022]. However, the chance of all human occupations becoming fully automatable was forecast to reach 10% by 2037, and 50% as late as 2116 (compared to 2164 in the 2022 survey). Most respondents expressed substantial uncertainty about the long-term value of AI progress: While 68.3% thought good outcomes from superhuman AI are more likely than bad, of these net optimists 48% gave at least a 5% chance of extremely bad outcomes such as human extinction, and 59% of net pessimists gave 5% or more to extremely good outcomes. Between 38% and 51% of respondents gave at least a 10% chance to advanced AI leading to outcomes as bad as human extinction. More than half suggested that substantial or extreme concern is warranted about six different AI-related scenarios, including misinformation, authoritarian control, and inequality. There was disagreement about whether faster or slower AI progress would be better for the future of humanity. However, there was broad agreement that research aimed at minimizing potential risks from AI systems ought to be prioritized more.
5/2/2024