The Role of Confidence for Trust-based Resilient Consensus (Extended Version)
2404.07838
0
0
Abstract
We consider a multi-agent system where agents aim to achieve a consensus despite interactions with malicious agents that communicate misleading information. Physical channels supporting communication in cyberphysical systems offer attractive opportunities to detect malicious agents, nevertheless, trustworthiness indications coming from the channel are subject to uncertainty and need to be treated with this in mind. We propose a resilient consensus protocol that incorporates trust observations from the channel and weighs them with a parameter that accounts for how confident an agent is regarding its understanding of the legitimacy of other agents in the network, with no need for the initial observation window $T_0$ that has been utilized in previous works. Analytical and numerical results show that (i) our protocol achieves a resilient consensus in the presence of malicious agents and (ii) the steady-state deviation from nominal consensus can be minimized by a suitable choice of the confidence parameter that depends on the statistics of trust observations.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the role of confidence in trust-based resilient consensus mechanisms for distributed systems.
- The authors propose a new model that incorporates agents' confidence levels in their interactions and decision-making processes.
- The research aims to understand how confidence affects the system's resilience to Byzantine faults and the overall convergence of the consensus.
Plain English Explanation
In distributed systems like blockchains or peer-to-peer networks, the participants (called "agents") need to reach a shared agreement or "consensus" on important decisions. This is challenging because some agents may be faulty or even deliberately trying to disrupt the process (known as "Byzantine faults").
The authors of this paper look at how the agents' confidence in each other affects the resilience and convergence of the consensus. Confidence is an important factor because it influences how much an agent trusts and relies on the information provided by other agents.
The researchers develop a new model that captures the agents' confidence levels and how they change over time based on their interactions. They then analyze how this confidence-based model affects the system's ability to reach a resilient consensus, even in the presence of some faulty or malicious agents.
By understanding the role of confidence, the researchers hope to design more robust and reliable consensus mechanisms for distributed systems, which are becoming increasingly important in areas like cryptocurrency, multi-agent coordination, and safety-critical applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel trust-based resilient consensus model that incorporates agents' confidence levels. The model defines a confidence value for each agent-to-agent interaction, which is updated based on the agents' past experiences and the information they receive from others.
The authors analyze the convergence and resilience properties of this confidence-based consensus model. They prove that the system can reach a Byzantine-resilient consensus as long as the number of faulty agents is below a certain threshold, which depends on the agents' confidence levels.
The paper also includes extensive simulations that demonstrate the advantages of the confidence-based model over traditional consensus protocols. The results show that the proposed approach can significantly improve the system's resilience to Byzantine faults and lead to faster convergence, especially in scenarios with high uncertainty or unreliable information.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-designed and theoretically-grounded approach to incorporating confidence into trust-based consensus mechanisms. The authors have carefully considered the practical implications of their model and provided comprehensive theoretical and empirical analysis to support their claims.
One potential limitation is that the model assumes a specific way of updating confidence based on agents' interactions. In real-world scenarios, the factors influencing confidence may be more complex and difficult to capture. The authors acknowledge this and suggest exploring alternative confidence update rules as an area for future research.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the system-level properties of the consensus process, but does not delve deeply into the individual decision-making processes of the agents. Understanding how agents form and update their confidence levels, and how this influences their behavior, could provide further insights into the dynamics of the overall system.
Further research could also investigate the implications of the confidence-based consensus model in specific application domains, such as safety-critical systems or multi-agent coordination, to understand its practical benefits and potential challenges.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to trust-based resilient consensus that explicitly models the confidence levels of the participating agents. The authors demonstrate that incorporating confidence can significantly enhance the system's resilience to Byzantine faults and improve the overall convergence of the consensus process.
The findings of this research have important implications for the design of robust and reliable distributed systems, particularly in areas where consensus is critical, such as blockchain and multi-agent coordination. By understanding the role of confidence in consensus mechanisms, researchers and practitioners can develop more effective and trustworthy solutions for a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
Trust-based Consensus in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Systems
Ho Long Fung, Victor-Alexandru Darvariu, Stephen Hailes, Mirco Musolesi
0
0
An often neglected issue in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is the potential presence of unreliable agents in the environment whose deviations from expected behavior can prevent a system from accomplishing its intended tasks. In particular, consensus is a fundamental underpinning problem of cooperative distributed multi-agent systems. Consensus requires different agents, situated in a decentralized communication network, to reach an agreement out of a set of initial proposals that they put forward. Learning-based agents should adopt a protocol that allows them to reach consensus despite having one or more unreliable agents in the system. This paper investigates the problem of unreliable agents in MARL, considering consensus as a case study. Echoing established results in the distributed systems literature, our experiments show that even a moderate fraction of such agents can greatly impact the ability of reaching consensus in a networked environment. We propose Reinforcement Learning-based Trusted Consensus (RLTC), a decentralized trust mechanism, in which agents can independently decide which neighbors to communicate with. We empirically demonstrate that our trust mechanism is able to handle unreliable agents effectively, as evidenced by higher consensus success rates.
5/31/2024
Resilient Average Consensus with Adversaries via Distributed Detection and Recovery
Liwei Yuan, Hideaki Ishii
0
0
We study the problem of resilient average consensus in multi-agent systems where some of the agents are subject to failures or attacks. The objective of resilient average consensus is for non-faulty/normal agents to converge to the average of their initial values despite the erroneous effects from malicious agents. To this end, we propose a successful distributed iterative resilient average consensus algorithm for the multi-agent networks with general directed topologies. The proposed algorithm has two parts at each iteration: detection and averaging. For the detection part, we propose two distributed algorithms and one of them can detect malicious agents with only the information from direct in-neighbors. For the averaging part, we extend the applicability of an existing averaging algorithm where normal agents can remove the effects from malicious agents so far, after they are detected. Another important feature of our method is that it can handle the case where malicious agents are neighboring and collaborating with each other to mislead the normal ones from averaging. This case cannot be solved by existing detection approaches in related literature. Moreover, our algorithm is efficient in storage usage especially for large-scale networks as each agent only requires the values of neighbors within two hops. Lastly, numerical examples are given to verify the efficacy of the proposed algorithms.
5/30/2024
🛠️
Resilient Distributed Optimization for Multi-Agent Cyberphysical Systems
Michal Yemini, Angelia Nedi'c, Andrea J. Goldsmith, Stephanie Gil
0
0
This work focuses on the problem of distributed optimization in multi-agent cyberphysical systems, where a legitimate agents' iterates are influenced both by the values it receives from potentially malicious neighboring agents, and by its own self-serving target function. We develop a new algorithmic and analytical framework to achieve resilience for the class of problems where stochastic values of trust between agents exist and can be exploited. In this case we show that convergence to the true global optimal point can be recovered, both in mean and almost surely, even in the presence of malicious agents. Furthermore, we provide expected convergence rate guarantees in the form of upper bounds on the expected squared distance to the optimal value. Finally, numerical results are presented that validate our analytical convergence guarantees even when the malicious agents compose the majority of agents in the network and where existing methods fail to converge to the optimal nominal points.
6/7/2024
📈
A biologically inspired computational trust model for open multi-agent systems which is resilient to trustor population changes
Zoi Lygizou, Dimitris Kalles
0
0
Current trust and reputation models continue to have significant limitations, such as the inability to deal with agents constantly entering or exiting open multi-agent systems (open MAS), as well as continuously changing behaviors. Our study is based on CA, a previously proposed decentralized computational trust model from the trustee's point of view, inspired by synaptic plasticity and the formation of assemblies in the human brain. It is designed to meet the requirements of highly dynamic and open MAS, and its main difference with most conventional trust and reputation models is that the trustor does not select a trustee to delegate a task; instead, the trustee determines whether it is qualified to successfully execute it. We ran a series of simulations to compare CA model to FIRE, a well-established, decentralized trust and reputation model for open MAS under conditions of continuous trustee and trustor population replacement, as well as continuous change of trustees' abilities to perform tasks. The main finding is that FIRE is superior to changes in the trustee population, whereas CA is resilient to the trustor population changes. When the trustees switch performance profiles FIRE clearly outperforms despite the fact that both models' performances are significantly impacted by this environmental change. Findings lead us to conclude that learning to use the appropriate trust model, according to the dynamic conditions in effect could maximize the trustor's benefits.
4/17/2024