RoPINN: Region Optimized Physics-Informed Neural Networks

2405.14369

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/24/2024 by Haixu Wu, Huakun Luo, Yuezhou Ma, Jianmin Wang, Mingsheng Long

šŸ§ 

Abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been widely applied to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) by enforcing outputs and gradients of deep models to satisfy target equations. Due to the limitation of numerical computation, PINNs are conventionally optimized on finite selected points. However, since PDEs are usually defined on continuous domains, solely optimizing models on scattered points may be insufficient to obtain an accurate solution for the whole domain. To mitigate this inherent deficiency of the default scatter-point optimization, this paper proposes and theoretically studies a new training paradigm as region optimization. Concretely, we propose to extend the optimization process of PINNs from isolated points to their continuous neighborhood regions, which can theoretically decrease the generalization error, especially for hidden high-order constraints of PDEs. A practical training algorithm, Region Optimized PINN (RoPINN), is seamlessly derived from this new paradigm, which is implemented by a straightforward but effective Monte Carlo sampling method. By calibrating the sampling process into trust regions, RoPINN finely balances sampling efficiency and generalization error. Experimentally, RoPINN consistently boosts the performance of diverse PINNs on a wide range of PDEs without extra backpropagation or gradient calculation.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a new training paradigm for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), which are used to solve partial differential equations (PDEs).
  • Traditional PINNs optimize the model only on scattered, discrete points, which may not be sufficient to accurately represent the continuous nature of PDEs.
  • The proposed approach, called Region Optimized PINN (RoPINN), extends the optimization process from isolated points to continuous neighborhood regions.
  • This can theoretically decrease the generalization error, especially for hidden high-order constraints of PDEs.
  • RoPINN uses a Monte Carlo sampling method to balance sampling efficiency and generalization error.

Plain English Explanation

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a type of machine learning model that can be used to solve partial differential equations (PDEs). PDEs are mathematical equations that describe how certain properties of a system change over time and space.

Traditional PINNs optimize their outputs and gradients to satisfy the target PDEs, but they only do this at a finite set of scattered points. This can be problematic because PDEs are usually defined on continuous domains, and optimizing only at discrete points may not be sufficient to accurately represent the entire continuous domain.

To address this, the researchers propose a new training approach called Region Optimized PINN (RoPINN). Instead of optimizing the model at just a few isolated points, RoPINN extends the optimization process to the continuous neighborhood regions around those points. This can theoretically improve the model's ability to capture the hidden, higher-order constraints of the PDEs, leading to better overall performance.

RoPINN uses a simple but effective Monte Carlo sampling method to balance the efficiency of the optimization process with the need to accurately represent the continuous domain. This helps the model learn the PDEs more effectively than traditional PINN approaches.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the introduction of a new training paradigm for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) called Region Optimization.

Traditionally, PINNs are optimized on a finite set of scattered points, which may be insufficient to accurately represent the continuous nature of the partial differential equations (PDEs) they are trying to solve. To address this, the researchers propose extending the optimization process from isolated points to their continuous neighborhood regions.

Mathematically, this Region Optimization approach can theoretically decrease the generalization error of the PINN, especially for PDEs with hidden high-order constraints. The researchers derive a practical training algorithm called Region Optimized PINN (RoPINN), which implements this new paradigm using a straightforward Monte Carlo sampling method.

The key advantage of RoPINN is that it can balance the sampling efficiency and generalization error by calibrating the sampling process into trust regions. This allows RoPINN to consistently outperform traditional PINNs on a wide range of PDEs without requiring any additional backpropagation or gradient calculation.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a compelling theoretical argument for why the Region Optimization approach can improve the performance of PINNs, especially for PDEs with hidden high-order constraints. The experimental results they present also demonstrate the practical effectiveness of the RoPINN algorithm.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the approach. For example, the computational overhead of the Monte Carlo sampling process is not discussed, and it's unclear how the method would scale to very large or complex PDEs. Additionally, the choice of trust region parameters and their impact on performance is not thoroughly analyzed.

Furthermore, the paper does not provide a comparative analysis with other PINN optimization techniques, such as those that use conformalized loss functions. It would be valuable to understand how RoPINN's performance compares to these alternative approaches.

Overall, the Region Optimization paradigm and the RoPINN algorithm represent a promising step forward in improving the accuracy and robustness of PINNs for solving PDEs. Further research and experimentation will be needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and broader applicability of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new training paradigm for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) called Region Optimization, which extends the optimization process from isolated points to continuous neighborhood regions. This can theoretically improve the model's ability to capture the hidden, higher-order constraints of partial differential equations (PDEs).

The researchers derive a practical algorithm called Region Optimized PINN (RoPINN) that implements this new paradigm using a Monte Carlo sampling method. RoPINN is shown to consistently outperform traditional PINNs on a variety of PDEs, without requiring any additional backpropagation or gradient calculation.

While the paper presents a compelling theoretical argument and promising experimental results, it also highlights the need for further research to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and broader applicability of the Region Optimization approach. Exploring how RoPINN compares to other PINN optimization techniques and analyzing its scalability to larger, more complex PDEs will be important areas for future work.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

VS-PINN: A Fast and efficient training of physics-informed neural networks using variable-scaling methods for solving PDEs with stiff behavior

VS-PINN: A Fast and efficient training of physics-informed neural networks using variable-scaling methods for solving PDEs with stiff behavior

Seungchan Ko, Sang Hyeon Park

YC

0

Reddit

0

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising way to compute the solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs) using deep neural networks. However, despite their significant success in various fields, it remains unclear in many aspects how to effectively train PINNs if the solutions of PDEs exhibit stiff behaviors or high frequencies. In this paper, we propose a new method for training PINNs using variable-scaling techniques. This method is simple and it can be applied to a wide range of problems including PDEs with rapidly-varying solutions. Throughout various numerical experiments, we will demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for these problems and confirm that it can significantly improve the training efficiency and performance of PINNs. Furthermore, based on the analysis of the neural tangent kernel (NTK), we will provide theoretical evidence for this phenomenon and show that our methods can indeed improve the performance of PINNs.

Read more

6/11/2024

šŸ”Ž

CP-PINNs: Data-Driven Changepoints Detection in PDEs Using Online Optimized Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Zhikang Dong, Pawel Polak

YC

0

Reddit

0

We investigate the inverse problem for Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) in scenarios where the parameters of the given PDE dynamics may exhibit changepoints at random time. We employ Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) - universal approximators capable of estimating the solution of any physical law described by a system of PDEs, which serves as a regularization during neural network training, restricting the space of admissible solutions and enhancing function approximation accuracy. We demonstrate that when the system exhibits sudden changes in the PDE dynamics, this regularization is either insufficient to accurately estimate the true dynamics, or it may result in model miscalibration and failure. Consequently, we propose a PINNs extension using a Total-Variation penalty, which allows to accommodate multiple changepoints in the PDE dynamics and significantly improves function approximation. These changepoints can occur at random locations over time and are estimated concurrently with the solutions. Additionally, we introduce an online learning method for re-weighting loss function terms dynamically. Through empirical analysis using examples of various equations with parameter changes, we showcase the advantages of our proposed model. In the absence of changepoints, the model reverts to the original PINNs model. However, when changepoints are present, our approach yields superior parameter estimation, improved model fitting, and reduced training error compared to the original PINNs model.

Read more

4/3/2024

šŸ§ 

Efficient Error Certification for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Francisco Eiras, Adel Bibi, Rudy Bunel, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham, Philip Torr, M. Pawan Kumar

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent work provides promising evidence that Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) can efficiently solve partial differential equations (PDE). However, previous works have failed to provide guarantees on the worst-case residual error of a PINN across the spatio-temporal domain - a measure akin to the tolerance of numerical solvers - focusing instead on point-wise comparisons between their solution and the ones obtained by a solver on a set of inputs. In real-world applications, one cannot consider tests on a finite set of points to be sufficient grounds for deployment, as the performance could be substantially worse on a different set. To alleviate this issue, we establish guaranteed error-based conditions for PINNs over their continuous applicability domain. To verify the extent to which they hold, we introduce $partial$-CROWN: a general, efficient and scalable post-training framework to bound PINN residual errors. We demonstrate its effectiveness in obtaining tight certificates by applying it to two classically studied PINNs - Burgers' and Schrodinger's equations -, and two more challenging ones with real-world applications - the Allan-Cahn and Diffusion-Sorption equations.

Read more

5/30/2024

šŸ› ļø

Unveiling the optimization process of Physics Informed Neural Networks: How accurate and competitive can PINNs be?

Jorge F. Urb'an, Petros Stefanou, Jos'e A. Pons

YC

0

Reddit

0

This study investigates the potential accuracy boundaries of physics-informed neural networks, contrasting their approach with previous similar works and traditional numerical methods. We find that selecting improved optimization algorithms significantly enhances the accuracy of the results. Simple modifications to the loss function may also improve precision, offering an additional avenue for enhancement. Despite optimization algorithms having a greater impact on convergence than adjustments to the loss function, practical considerations often favor tweaking the latter due to ease of implementation. On a global scale, the integration of an enhanced optimizer and a marginally adjusted loss function enables a reduction in the loss function by several orders of magnitude across diverse physical problems. Consequently, our results obtained using compact networks (typically comprising 2 or 3 layers of 20-30 neurons) achieve accuracies comparable to finite difference schemes employing thousands of grid points. This study encourages the continued advancement of PINNs and associated optimization techniques for broader applications across various fields.

Read more

5/8/2024