Slight Corruption in Pre-training Data Makes Better Diffusion Models

Overview

• Diffusion models (DMs) have shown impressive capabilities in generating high-quality images, audios, and videos.
• DMs rely on extensive pre-training on large-scale datasets, which can sometimes include corrupted data where the conditions (e.g., image-text pairs) do not accurately describe the data.
• This paper explores the impact of such data corruption on the performance of DMs, both during pre-training and downstream adaptation.

Plain English Explanation

Diffusion models are a type of machine learning system that can generate realistic-looking images, sounds, and videos. These models are trained on large datasets of information, such as images paired with text descriptions or images labeled with categories.

However, even after careful cleaning, these datasets can sometimes contain corrupted or inaccurate information. For example, an image might be paired with a text description that doesn't accurately describe what's in the image.

This research paper investigates how this kind of data corruption affects the performance of diffusion models. The researchers synthetically introduced different types of corruption into two popular datasets (ImageNet and CC3M) and then trained over 50 diffusion models using the corrupted data.

Surprisingly, the researchers found that a little bit of corruption can actually improve the quality, diversity, and accuracy of the images generated by the diffusion models, both during the initial training and when the models are adapted to new tasks. The researchers think this is because the slight corruption adds some helpful "noise" that makes the models more robust and able to better capture the underlying patterns in the data.

Inspired by these findings, the researchers propose a simple technique called "condition embedding perturbation" that can be used to improve the training of diffusion models on real-world datasets. This technique involves intentionally adding a small amount of noise or corruption to the input conditions (like the text descriptions) during training, which can lead to better-performing models.

Overall, this research provides new insights into how the quality of training data affects the performance of diffusion models, and suggests that a little bit of controlled corruption can actually be beneficial for these powerful AI systems.

Technical Explanation

This paper presents a comprehensive study on the impact of corrupted pre-training data on the performance of diffusion models (DMs). Diffusion models have demonstrated remarkable abilities in generating realistic high-quality images, audios, and videos, but they heavily rely on extensive pre-training on large-scale datasets.

The researchers synthetically corrupted two popular datasets, ImageNet-1K and CC3M, and used the corrupted data to pre-train over 50 conditional DMs. Their empirical findings reveal that various types of slight corruption in the pre-training data can significantly enhance the quality, diversity, and fidelity of the generated images, both during pre-training and downstream adaptation.

Theoretically, the researchers consider a Gaussian mixture model and prove that slight corruption in the input conditions leads to higher entropy and a reduced 2-Wasserstein distance to the ground truth of the data distribution generated by the corruptly trained DMs.

Inspired by this analysis, the researchers propose a simple method called "condition embedding perturbation" (CEP) to improve the training of DMs on practical datasets. CEP involves intentionally adding a small amount of noise or corruption to the input conditions during training, which can significantly improve the performance of various DMs in both pre-training and downstream tasks.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a comprehensive and well-designed study on the impact of corrupted pre-training data on diffusion models. However, the paper does not fully address the potential risks or limitations of this approach.

For example, the researchers only explore synthetic corruption of the datasets, and it's unclear how well their findings would translate to real-world datasets with more complex and varied types of corruption. Additionally, while the condition embedding perturbation method shows promising results, the paper does not explore the long-term effects of this technique or how it might interact with other model training strategies.

Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the ethical implications of using potentially corrupted data or intentionally introducing noise during training. There could be concerns around the reliability and trustworthiness of models trained in this way, especially in sensitive applications like medical imaging or autonomous systems.

Overall, the research provides valuable insights into the robustness of diffusion models to data corruption, but more work is needed to fully understand the implications and potential risks of these techniques.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive study on the impact of corrupted pre-training data on the performance of diffusion models (DMs). The researchers found that a small amount of corruption in the input conditions can actually improve the quality, diversity, and fidelity of the images generated by DMs, both during pre-training and downstream adaptation.

The researchers propose a simple technique called "condition embedding perturbation" that intentionally introduces a controlled amount of noise or corruption to the input conditions during training, leading to better-performing DMs. This research provides new insights into the robustness of DMs and suggests that carefully managed data corruption could be a valuable tool for improving the training of these powerful AI systems.

However, the paper also highlights the need for further exploration of the potential risks and limitations of this approach, particularly when it comes to the use of DMs in sensitive or high-stakes applications. Nonetheless, this study represents an important step forward in understanding the complex relationship between data quality, model training, and AI system performance.