Speech Emotion Recognition with ASR Transcripts: A Comprehensive Study on Word Error Rate and Fusion Techniques

Overview

• This paper presents a comprehensive study on the impact of automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcripts and their word error rate (WER) on speech emotion recognition (SER) systems.
• The researchers explore different fusion techniques that combine acoustic, linguistic, and ASR-based features to improve SER performance.
• They also investigate the relationship between WER and SER accuracy, providing insights into the trade-offs and potential mitigation strategies.

Plain English Explanation

The paper investigates how well speech emotion recognition (SER) systems work when they use transcripts from automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems instead of perfect human-generated transcripts. ASR systems sometimes make mistakes, resulting in a "word error rate" (WER) that measures how many words are incorrectly transcribed.

The researchers wanted to understand how the WER of the ASR transcripts affects the accuracy of the SER system. They tested different ways of combining the acoustic (sound-based) features, linguistic (text-based) features, and the ASR-based features to see which approach works best. The goal was to find a way to make SER systems more robust to the errors in ASR transcripts.

The findings provide insights into the trade-offs between WER and SER accuracy, and suggest strategies that SER systems can use to mitigate the impact of ASR errors. This is important because many real-world applications of SER, such as customer service call centers, rely on ASR transcripts rather than perfect text transcripts.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the performance of speech emotion recognition (SER) systems when using automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcripts instead of perfect text transcripts. The researchers explore the relationship between the word error rate (WER) of the ASR transcripts and the accuracy of the SER system.

They propose and evaluate different fusion techniques that combine acoustic, linguistic, and ASR-based features to improve SER performance in the presence of ASR errors. The fusion approaches include early fusion, late fusion, and hybrid fusion, which integrate the different feature modalities at various stages of the SER model.

The experiments were conducted on two publicly available datasets, IEMOCAP and MSP-IMPROV, using an ASR system to generate transcripts with varying WER levels. The researchers also explored the use of a multimedia-assisted ASR system to improve the quality of the transcripts.

The results show that the fusion of acoustic, linguistic, and ASR-based features can improve SER performance compared to using a single modality. However, the SER accuracy is still significantly affected by the WER of the ASR transcripts, particularly at higher WER levels. The researchers provide insights into the trade-offs between WER and SER accuracy, and discuss potential mitigation strategies.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive study on the impact of ASR transcripts and their WER on SER systems. The researchers have thoroughly explored various fusion techniques and their effectiveness in mitigating the effects of ASR errors.

One potential limitation of the study is that it only considers two publicly available datasets, which may not be representative of all real-world scenarios. The performance of the fusion techniques and the relationship between WER and SER accuracy may vary across different domains and datasets.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential bias and inaccuracies in the ASR system itself, which could be an important factor in the overall performance of the SER system. Conversational speech recognition is a challenging task, and the performance of the ASR system used in the study may not be representative of the latest advancements in the field.

Further research could explore the impact of different ASR systems, including more advanced techniques like multimedia-assisted ASR, on the performance of SER systems. Investigating the interactions between ASR errors, speaker characteristics, and emotional expression could also provide valuable insights for improving the robustness of SER systems in real-world applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive study on the impact of ASR transcripts and their word error rate (WER) on speech emotion recognition (SER) systems. The researchers explore various fusion techniques that combine acoustic, linguistic, and ASR-based features to improve SER performance in the presence of ASR errors.

The findings demonstrate that the fusion of multiple modalities can enhance SER accuracy compared to using a single modality. However, the SER accuracy is still significantly affected by the WER of the ASR transcripts, particularly at higher WER levels. The study provides valuable insights into the trade-offs between WER and SER accuracy, and suggests potential mitigation strategies that SER systems can employ to improve their robustness in real-world applications relying on ASR transcripts.