A Survey on Contribution Evaluation in Vertical Federated Learning

Overview

• This paper explores the critical issue of contribution evaluation in Vertical Federated Learning (VFL), a machine learning approach that enables collaboration between multiple entities while preserving privacy.
• VFL allows different organizations to jointly train predictive models without directly sharing their data, addressing privacy concerns associated with centralized data storage and processing.
• Evaluating each entity's contribution to the learning process is crucial for maintaining trust, ensuring equitable resource sharing, and fostering a sustainable collaboration framework in VFL.

Plain English Explanation

Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) is a way for multiple organizations to work together on a machine learning task without sharing their private data. Instead of sending all the data to a central location, the organizations each keep their own data and collaborate to train a shared model.

One key aspect of VFL is understanding how much each organization contributed to the final model. This is important for a few reasons:

1. Trust: If the organizations don't feel like their contribution is being fairly evaluated, they may be less willing to participate in the collaboration.
2. Equitable Resource Sharing: The organizations need to know how much they should be compensated for their contributions to the model.
3. Sustainable Collaboration: A fair and transparent contribution evaluation process helps maintain a healthy, long-term collaboration between the participating entities.

This paper provides a comprehensive review of the different techniques used to evaluate contributions in VFL. It categorizes these techniques based on factors like the stage of the VFL process, the level of granularity, and the privacy considerations involved.

The paper also explores various tasks in VFL that require contribution evaluation, and analyzes the properties and requirements of these tasks in relation to the VFL lifecycle.

By shedding light on the current landscape and future challenges of contribution evaluation in VFL, the paper aims to guide researchers and practitioners in developing more effective, efficient, and privacy-centric VFL solutions.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the importance of contribution evaluation in Vertical Federated Learning (VFL), a machine learning approach that enables collaboration among multiple entities with distinct feature sets on the same user population. VFL allows for the joint training of predictive models without direct data sharing, addressing privacy concerns associated with centralized data storage and processing.

The authors categorize the various contribution evaluation techniques along several dimensions:

1. VFL Lifecycle: Contribution evaluation can occur at different stages of the VFL process, such as during model training, model aggregation, or model evaluation.
2. Granularity of Evaluation: Contribution can be evaluated at the feature, sample, or model level.
3. Privacy Considerations: Some techniques prioritize privacy preservation, while others focus on computational efficiency or interpretability.
4. Core Computational Methods: The underlying mathematical and statistical techniques used for contribution evaluation, such as attribution methods, game theory, or information theory.

The paper then explores various VFL tasks that involve contribution evaluation, such as federated learning in e-health or privacy-preserving machine learning. It analyzes the required evaluation properties and their relation to the VFL lifecycle phases for each task.

Finally, the authors present a vision for the future challenges of contribution evaluation in VFL, covering topics such as scalability, robustness, and the integration of contribution evaluation into the overall VFL framework.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured review of contribution evaluation techniques in Vertical Federated Learning, addressing a critical aspect of this emerging field. The categorization of the techniques along various dimensions is particularly useful for researchers and practitioners to navigate the landscape and identify the most appropriate approaches for their specific use cases.

One potential limitation mentioned in the paper is the need for further research on the scalability of contribution evaluation methods, especially as the number of participating entities and the complexity of the VFL tasks increase. Additionally, the authors note the importance of developing robust contribution evaluation techniques that can handle potential adversarial attacks or data shifts, which could undermine the fairness and trust in the VFL collaboration.

While the paper provides a thorough overview of the current state of the art, it would be beneficial to see more discussion on the real-world deployment and practical challenges of implementing contribution evaluation in VFL. The authors could also explore the potential trade-offs between different evaluation methods, such as the balance between privacy, interpretability, and computational efficiency.

Overall, this paper serves as a valuable resource for the research community, offering a solid foundation for understanding the importance of contribution evaluation in VFL and the various approaches available. By continuing to address the challenges and limitations highlighted in the paper, researchers can further advance the field of Vertical Federated Learning and its practical applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive review of contribution evaluation in Vertical Federated Learning (VFL), a critical aspect of this emerging machine learning approach that enables collaborative model training while preserving privacy. The authors categorize the diverse range of contribution evaluation techniques along multiple dimensions, including the VFL lifecycle, granularity of evaluation, privacy considerations, and core computational methods.

By exploring various VFL tasks and analyzing the required evaluation properties, the paper provides a structured understanding of the current landscape and the future challenges in this area. The findings and insights from this work can guide researchers and practitioners in developing more effective, efficient, and privacy-centric VFL solutions that foster sustainable collaborations among participating entities.

The compiled literature and open-source resources available in the associated GitHub repository further enhance the value of this paper as a comprehensive reference for the VFL research community.