Towards Biologically Plausible Computing: A Comprehensive Comparison
2406.16062
0
0
Abstract
Backpropagation is a cornerstone algorithm in training neural networks for supervised learning, which uses a gradient descent method to update network weights by minimizing the discrepancy between actual and desired outputs. Despite its pivotal role in propelling deep learning advancements, the biological plausibility of backpropagation is questioned due to its requirements for weight symmetry, global error computation, and dual-phase training. To address this long-standing challenge, many studies have endeavored to devise biologically plausible training algorithms. However, a fully biologically plausible algorithm for training multilayer neural networks remains elusive, and interpretations of biological plausibility vary among researchers. In this study, we establish criteria for biological plausibility that a desirable learning algorithm should meet. Using these criteria, we evaluate a range of existing algorithms considered to be biologically plausible, including Hebbian learning, spike-timing-dependent plasticity, feedback alignment, target propagation, predictive coding, forward-forward algorithm, perturbation learning, local losses, and energy-based learning. Additionally, we empirically evaluate these algorithms across diverse network architectures and datasets. We compare the feature representations learned by these algorithms with brain activity recorded by non-invasive devices under identical stimuli, aiming to identify which algorithm can most accurately replicate brain activity patterns. We are hopeful that this study could inspire the development of new biologically plausible algorithms for training multilayer networks, thereby fostering progress in both the fields of neuroscience and machine learning.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive comparison of various approaches towards building biologically plausible computing systems.
- It examines the criteria for biological plausibility and how different models and algorithms measure up against these criteria.
- The paper covers a range of techniques, including Contribute to Balance Wire Accordance Emergence Backpropagation, Improved Forward-Forward Contrastive Learning, Deep Learning Without Weight Symmetry, and Two Tales of Single-Phase Contrastive Hebbian Learning.
- The analysis looks at the strengths and limitations of each approach in terms of their biological plausibility and potential applications.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores different ways of building computer systems that work more like the human brain. The brain is a remarkable biological machine that can perform incredibly complex tasks, and researchers are interested in understanding how it works so they can create artificial systems that mimic its capabilities.
The paper lays out a set of criteria for what makes a computing system "biologically plausible" - in other words, how closely it matches the way the brain operates. These include things like using neuron-like units that communicate through synaptic connections, having local learning rules that update connections based on nearby activity, and avoiding centralized control or pre-defined architectures.
The paper then looks at several specific techniques that have been proposed for building biologically plausible computing systems. For example, Contribute to Balance Wire Accordance Emergence Backpropagation tries to create neural networks that learn in a more brain-like way, while Improved Forward-Forward Contrastive Learning focuses on training networks to discover useful representations of data without requiring labeled examples.
Each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to matching the brain's biological characteristics. The paper provides a detailed analysis of how well the different techniques align with the criteria for biological plausibility, and discusses the potential applications and limitations of each one.
The overall goal is to move towards computing systems that are not just powerful and efficient, but also fundamentally more similar to the way biological brains process information. This could lead to new breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, as well as a deeper understanding of how our own minds work.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive comparison of various approaches towards building biologically plausible computing systems. It begins by defining a set of criteria for biological plausibility, including the use of neuron-like units, local learning rules, and the absence of centralized control or pre-defined architectures.
The paper then examines several specific techniques that have been proposed for creating biologically plausible computing systems. These include:
-
Contribute to Balance Wire Accordance Emergence Backpropagation: A method that aims to create neural networks that learn in a more brain-like way, by introducing constraints that promote balanced wire usage and the emergence of backpropagation-like dynamics.
-
Improved Forward-Forward Contrastive Learning: A technique that trains neural networks to discover useful representations of data without requiring labeled examples, by learning to contrast different views of the same input.
-
Deep Learning Without Weight Symmetry: An approach that relaxes the requirement for symmetric weights in neural networks, which is often necessary for backpropagation-based training but is not found in biological neural networks.
-
Two Tales of Single-Phase Contrastive Hebbian Learning: A technique that uses a single-phase learning rule inspired by Hebbian learning, which is thought to be a more biologically plausible alternative to the two-phase learning used in traditional backpropagation.
For each of these techniques, the paper provides a detailed analysis of how well they align with the criteria for biological plausibility, as well as their potential applications and limitations. The goal is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches, and to help guide the development of computing systems that are not only powerful, but also more closely resemble the way biological brains process information.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched comparison of various approaches towards biologically plausible computing. It effectively identifies the key criteria for biological plausibility and uses these as a framework for evaluating the different techniques.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it focuses primarily on the technical aspects of the various approaches, without delving deeply into the real-world applications or the broader implications of this line of research. While the technical analysis is valuable, it would be helpful to have a more explicit discussion of how these biologically plausible computing systems could be used to advance fields like artificial intelligence, neuroscience, or cognitive science.
Additionally, the paper does not fully address the inherent challenges and trade-offs involved in creating biologically plausible computing systems. While it identifies some of the limitations of each approach, a more critical examination of the fundamental obstacles and potential pitfalls could help readers better understand the current state of the field and the work that still needs to be done.
Despite these minor limitations, the paper is a valuable contribution to the ongoing effort to bridge the gap between biological and artificial systems. By providing a comprehensive comparison of various techniques, it helps to define the key criteria for biological plausibility and highlights the important progress being made in this exciting area of research.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive comparison of different approaches towards building biologically plausible computing systems. By establishing a clear set of criteria for biological plausibility, the authors are able to systematically evaluate a range of techniques, including Contribute to Balance Wire Accordance Emergence Backpropagation, Improved Forward-Forward Contrastive Learning, Deep Learning Without Weight Symmetry, and Two Tales of Single-Phase Contrastive Hebbian Learning.
The analysis provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of each approach, highlighting the key trade-offs and challenges involved in creating computing systems that more closely resemble the biological brain. While the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects, it lays the groundwork for further exploration of the real-world applications and broader implications of this line of research.
Overall, this comprehensive comparison represents an important contribution to the ongoing efforts to bridge the gap between biological and artificial systems, offering a roadmap for the development of more biologically plausible computing architectures and algorithms. As the field continues to evolve, this paper will serve as a valuable reference and starting point for researchers and practitioners working towards this ambitious goal.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
Contribute to balance, wire in accordance: Emergence of backpropagation from a simple, bio-plausible neuroplasticity rule
Xinhao Fan, Shreesh P Mysore
0
0
Backpropagation (BP) has been pivotal in advancing machine learning and remains essential in computational applications and comparative studies of biological and artificial neural networks. Despite its widespread use, the implementation of BP in the brain remains elusive, and its biological plausibility is often questioned due to inherent issues such as the need for symmetry of weights between forward and backward connections, and the requirement of distinct forward and backward phases of computation. Here, we introduce a novel neuroplasticity rule that offers a potential mechanism for implementing BP in the brain. Similar in general form to the classical Hebbian rule, this rule is based on the core principles of maintaining the balance of excitatory and inhibitory inputs as well as on retrograde signaling, and operates over three progressively slower timescales: neural firing, retrograde signaling, and neural plasticity. We hypothesize that each neuron possesses an internal state, termed credit, in addition to its firing rate. After achieving equilibrium in firing rates, neurons receive credits based on their contribution to the E-I balance of postsynaptic neurons through retrograde signaling. As the network's credit distribution stabilizes, connections from those presynaptic neurons are strengthened that significantly contribute to the balance of postsynaptic neurons. We demonstrate mathematically that our learning rule precisely replicates BP in layered neural networks without any approximations. Simulations on artificial neural networks reveal that this rule induces varying community structures in networks, depending on the learning rate. This simple theoretical framework presents a biologically plausible implementation of BP, with testable assumptions and predictions that may be evaluated through biological experiments.
5/24/2024
Improved Forward-Forward Contrastive Learning
Gananath R
0
0
The backpropagation algorithm, or backprop, is a widely utilized optimization technique in deep learning. While there's growing evidence suggesting that models trained with backprop can accurately explain neuronal data, no backprop-like method has yet been discovered in the biological brain for learning. Moreover, employing a naive implementation of backprop in the brain has several drawbacks. In 2022, Geoffrey Hinton proposed a biologically plausible learning method known as the Forward-Forward (FF) algorithm. Shortly after this paper, a modified version called FFCL was introduced. However, FFCL had limitations, notably being a three-stage learning system where the final stage still relied on regular backpropagation. In our approach, we address these drawbacks by eliminating the last two stages of FFCL and completely removing regular backpropagation. Instead, we rely solely on local updates, offering a more biologically plausible alternative.
5/28/2024
Deep Learning without Weight Symmetry
Li Ji-An, Marcus K. Benna
0
0
Backpropagation (BP), a foundational algorithm for training artificial neural networks, predominates in contemporary deep learning. Although highly successful, it is often considered biologically implausible. A significant limitation arises from the need for precise symmetry between connections in the backward and forward pathways to backpropagate gradient signals accurately, which is not observed in biological brains. Researchers have proposed several algorithms to alleviate this symmetry constraint, such as feedback alignment and direct feedback alignment. However, their divergence from backpropagation dynamics presents challenges, particularly in deeper networks and convolutional layers. Here we introduce the Product Feedback Alignment (PFA) algorithm. Our findings demonstrate that PFA closely approximates BP and achieves comparable performance in deep convolutional networks while avoiding explicit weight symmetry. Our results offer a novel solution to the longstanding weight symmetry problem, leading to more biologically plausible learning in deep convolutional networks compared to earlier methods.
6/3/2024
Two Tales of Single-Phase Contrastive Hebbian Learning
Rasmus Kj{ae}r H{o}ier, Christopher Zach
0
0
The search for ``biologically plausible'' learning algorithms has converged on the idea of representing gradients as activity differences. However, most approaches require a high degree of synchronization (distinct phases during learning) and introduce substantial computational overhead, which raises doubts regarding their biological plausibility as well as their potential utility for neuromorphic computing. Furthermore, they commonly rely on applying infinitesimal perturbations (nudges) to output units, which is impractical in noisy environments. Recently it has been shown that by modelling artificial neurons as dyads with two oppositely nudged compartments, it is possible for a fully local learning algorithm named ``dual propagation'' to bridge the performance gap to backpropagation, without requiring separate learning phases or infinitesimal nudging. However, the algorithm has the drawback that its numerical stability relies on symmetric nudging, which may be restrictive in biological and analog implementations. In this work we first provide a solid foundation for the objective underlying the dual propagation method, which also reveals a surprising connection with adversarial robustness. Second, we demonstrate how dual propagation is related to a particular adjoint state method, which is stable regardless of asymmetric nudging.
6/26/2024