Towards Generalizable and Faithful Logic Reasoning over Natural Language via Resolution Refutation
2404.01677
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant performance in various natural language reasoning tasks. However, they still struggle with performing first-order logic reasoning over formal logical theories expressed in natural language. This is because the previous LLMs-based reasoning systems have the theoretical incompleteness issue. As a result, it can only address a limited set of simple reasoning problems, which significantly decreases their generalization ability. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework, named Generalizable and Faithful Reasoner (GFaiR), which introduces the paradigm of resolution refutation. Resolution refutation has the capability to solve all first-order logic reasoning problems by extending reasoning rules and employing the principle of proof by contradiction, so our system's completeness can be improved by introducing resolution refutation. Experimental results demonstrate that our system outperforms previous works by achieving state-of-the-art performances in complex scenarios while maintaining performances in simple scenarios. Besides, we observe that GFaiR is faithful to its reasoning process.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach for natural language reasoning using resolution refutation, a logical inference technique.
- The goal is to develop a system that can perform generalizable and faithful reasoning over natural language, going beyond current limitations.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on various reasoning benchmarks, showing improvements over existing state-of-the-art methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles the challenge of enabling computers to reason logically about information expressed in natural language. This is a difficult problem because language can be ambiguous, with multiple possible meanings for the same words or phrases.
The researchers developed a system that uses a technique called "resolution refutation" to perform logical reasoning over natural language. Resolution refutation involves breaking down statements into their fundamental logical components, and then systematically trying to find contradictions that would disprove a given proposition.
By using this logical approach, the system is able to reason about language in a more generalizable and faithful way compared to previous methods. This means it can handle a broader range of language patterns and provide reasoning that aligns more closely with human intuition.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach through experiments on several standard benchmarks for language reasoning. The system outperformed existing state-of-the-art models, showing its potential to advance the field of natural language understanding and reasoning.
Technical Explanation
The core of the proposed approach is a neural network architecture that combines language modeling with resolution refutation-based logical reasoning. The model takes in natural language statements as input and generates a symbolic logical representation, which is then used to perform step-by-step logical inference.
The authors leverage large language models pre-trained on broad text data to effectively capture the semantics of natural language. This language understanding component is integrated with a reasoning module that performs resolution refutation - breaking down the input statements into clauses, systematically trying to find contradictions, and tracing the logical steps.
Through this hybrid architecture, the system is able to reason about language in a more generalizable and faithful manner compared to prior approaches that relied more heavily on pattern matching or rule-based logic. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on several benchmarks, including logical entailment, question answering, and commonsense reasoning tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for advancing natural language reasoning capabilities, but there are a few important caveats to consider:
Firstly, the authors acknowledge that their system still has limitations in handling certain types of complex language, such as metaphors or analogies. Further research is needed to extend the reasoning capabilities to handle a broader range of linguistic phenomena.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the failure cases or edge cases where the system may produce incorrect or unintuitive outputs. A more comprehensive evaluation of the system's limitations and potential biases would help contextualize the results.
Finally, the proposed architecture, while innovative, relies on large pre-trained language models which can be computationally expensive and require significant amounts of training data. Developing more efficient and data-efficient reasoning systems remains an important area for further exploration.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach for natural language reasoning that combines language understanding with logical inference via resolution refutation. The results demonstrate improvements over existing state-of-the-art methods, suggesting the potential of this hybrid reasoning framework to advance the field of natural language understanding.
While the system has some limitations, the core ideas presented in this work represent an important step towards building AI systems that can reason about language in a more generalizable and faithful manner. Further research building upon these insights could lead to significant advancements in natural language processing and reasoning capabilities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¬
FiDeLiS: Faithful Reasoning in Large Language Model for Knowledge Graph Question Answering
Yuan Sui, Yufei He, Nian Liu, Xiaoxin He, Kun Wang, Bryan Hooi
0
0
While large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant success in various applications, they often struggle with hallucinations, especially in scenarios that require deep and responsible reasoning. These issues could be partially mitigate by integrating external knowledge graphs (KG) in LLM reasoning. However, the method of their incorporation is still largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose a retrieval-exploration interactive method, FiDelis to handle intermediate steps of reasoning grounded by KGs. Specifically, we propose Path-RAG module for recalling useful intermediate knowledge from KG for LLM reasoning. We incorporate the logic and common-sense reasoning of LLMs and topological connectivity of KGs into the knowledge retrieval process, which provides more accurate recalling performance. Furthermore, we propose to leverage deductive reasoning capabilities of LLMs as a better criterion to automatically guide the reasoning process in a stepwise and generalizable manner. Deductive verification serve as precise indicators for when to cease further reasoning, thus avoiding misleading the chains of reasoning and unnecessary computation. Extensive experiments show that our method, as a training-free method with lower computational cost and better generality outperforms the existing strong baselines in three benchmarks.
5/24/2024
Reason from Fallacy: Enhancing Large Language Models' Logical Reasoning through Logical Fallacy Understanding
Yanda Li, Dixuan Wang, Jiaqing Liang, Guochao Jiang, Qianyu He, Yanghua Xiao, Deqing Yang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated good performance in many reasoning tasks, but they still struggle with some complicated reasoning tasks including logical reasoning. One non-negligible reason for LLMs' suboptimal performance on logical reasoning is their overlooking of understanding logical fallacies correctly. To evaluate LLMs' capability of logical fallacy understanding (LFU), we propose five concrete tasks from three cognitive dimensions of WHAT, WHY, and HOW in this paper. Towards these LFU tasks, we have successfully constructed a new dataset LFUD based on GPT-4 accompanied by a little human effort. Our extensive experiments justify that our LFUD can be used not only to evaluate LLMs' LFU capability, but also to fine-tune LLMs to obtain significantly enhanced performance on logical reasoning.
4/9/2024
LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models
Mihir Parmar, Nisarg Patel, Neeraj Varshney, Mutsumi Nakamura, Man Luo, Santosh Mashetty, Arindam Mitra, Chitta Baral
0
0
Recently developed large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform remarkably well on a wide range of language understanding tasks. But, can they really reason over the natural language? This question has been receiving significant research attention and many reasoning skills such as commonsense, numerical, and qualitative have been studied. However, the crucial skill pertaining to 'logical reasoning' has remained underexplored. Existing work investigating this reasoning ability of LLMs has focused only on a couple of inference rules (such as modus ponens and modus tollens) of propositional and first-order logic. Addressing the above limitation, we comprehensively evaluate the logical reasoning ability of LLMs on 25 different reasoning patterns spanning over propositional, first-order, and non-monotonic logics. To enable systematic evaluation, we introduce LogicBench, a natural language question-answering dataset focusing on the use of a single inference rule. We conduct detailed analysis with a range of LLMs such as GPT-4, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama-2, and Mistral using chain-of-thought prompting. Experimental results show that existing LLMs do not fare well on LogicBench; especially, they struggle with instances involving complex reasoning and negations. Furthermore, they sometimes overlook contextual information necessary for reasoning to arrive at the correct conclusion. We believe that our work and findings facilitate future research for evaluating and enhancing the logical reasoning ability of LLMs. Data and code are available at https://github.com/Mihir3009/LogicBench.
6/7/2024
šæ
NL2FOL: Translating Natural Language to First-Order Logic for Logical Fallacy Detection
Abhinav Lalwani, Lovish Chopra, Christopher Hahn, Caroline Trippel, Zhijing Jin, Mrinmaya Sachan
0
0
Logical fallacies are common errors in reasoning that undermine the logic of an argument. Automatically detecting logical fallacies has important applications in tracking misinformation and validating claims. In this paper, we design a process to reliably detect logical fallacies by translating natural language to First-order Logic (FOL) step-by-step using Large Language Models (LLMs). We then utilize Satisfiability Modulo Theory (SMT) solvers to reason about the validity of the formula and classify inputs as either a fallacy or valid statement. Our model also provides a novel means of utilizing LLMs to interpret the output of the SMT solver, offering insights into the counter-examples that illustrate why a given sentence is considered a logical fallacy. Our approach is robust, interpretable and does not require training data or fine-tuning. We evaluate our model on a mixed dataset of fallacies and valid sentences. The results demonstrate improved performance compared to end-to-end LLMs, with our classifier achieving an F1-score of 71% on the Logic dataset. The approach is able to generalize effectively, achieving an F1-score of 73% on the challenge set, LogicClimate, outperforming state-of-the-art models by 21% despite its much smaller size.
5/7/2024