Towards unlocking the mystery of adversarial fragility of neural networks
2406.16200
0
0
Abstract
In this paper, we study the adversarial robustness of deep neural networks for classification tasks. We look at the smallest magnitude of possible additive perturbations that can change the output of a classification algorithm. We provide a matrix-theoretic explanation of the adversarial fragility of deep neural network for classification. In particular, our theoretical results show that neural network's adversarial robustness can degrade as the input dimension $d$ increases. Analytically we show that neural networks' adversarial robustness can be only $1/sqrt{d}$ of the best possible adversarial robustness. Our matrix-theoretic explanation is consistent with an earlier information-theoretic feature-compression-based explanation for the adversarial fragility of neural networks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the "adversarial fragility" of neural networks, which refers to the vulnerability of these models to small, carefully crafted input perturbations that can cause them to make incorrect predictions.
- The authors aim to unlock the mystery behind this adversarial fragility and provide insights that could lead to more robust and reliable neural network models.
Plain English Explanation
Neural networks, a type of machine learning model, have become incredibly powerful at tasks like image recognition, natural language processing, and game-playing. However, these models have a surprising weakness - they can be easily "fooled" by small, imperceptible changes to their inputs, known as adversarial examples.
For example, imagine an image classifier that can accurately identify a dog with near-perfect accuracy. But if you slightly tweak the pixels in the image, perhaps adding a barely noticeable speck of color, the model might suddenly think the image is a cat. This vulnerability is known as "adversarial fragility," and it's a mystery that researchers are still trying to solve.
The authors of this paper set out to better understand the origins of this adversarial fragility. By conducting a series of experiments and analyses, they hope to uncover the underlying reasons why neural networks are so sensitive to these small input changes, and ultimately find ways to make them more robust and reliable.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by outlining the problem of adversarial fragility in neural networks. The authors explain how even state-of-the-art models can be easily fooled by adversarial examples - inputs that have been carefully modified to cause the model to make incorrect predictions, despite the modifications being virtually imperceptible to humans.
To investigate this phenomenon, the researchers design a series of experiments using various neural network architectures and datasets. They explore factors like the size and location of adversarial perturbations, the role of model complexity, and the impact of model initialization and training procedures.
Through their analysis, the authors identify several key insights. For example, they find that adversarial fragility is closely tied to the high-dimensional nature of neural network representations, and that methods that reduce the dimensionality of these representations can help improve robustness, as shown in the Robust Width Lightweight Certifiable Adversarial Defense paper.
The researchers also explore the relationship between adversarial fragility and model interpretability, as discussed in the Exploring DNN Robustness Against Adversarial Attacks Using paper. They find that models with higher interpretability tend to be more robust to adversarial examples, suggesting that understanding the inner workings of neural networks could be key to addressing their fragility.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and insightful investigation of the adversarial fragility problem, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that their experiments are largely focused on image classification tasks, and it's unclear how well their findings would generalize to other domains, such as natural language processing or reinforcement learning.
Additionally, while the paper offers several potential strategies for improving model robustness, such as dimensionality reduction and increased interpretability, the authors caution that these approaches may come with their own trade-offs, as highlighted in the ET Tu, Certifications? Robustness Certificates Yield Better paper. Further research is needed to fully understand the implications and practical applications of these techniques.
Another potential issue is the reliance on specific adversarial attack methods, which may not capture the full range of vulnerabilities that neural networks can face. As discussed in the Adversarial Attacks Dimensionality Text Classifiers paper, adversarial attacks can take many forms, and a comprehensive understanding of neural network robustness may require a broader set of evaluation methods.
Conclusion
This paper represents an important step towards unlocking the mystery of adversarial fragility in neural networks. By conducting a series of carefully designed experiments and analyses, the authors have shed light on the underlying factors that contribute to this vulnerability, and have identified several promising avenues for improving model robustness.
While the findings of this paper are valuable, it's clear that much more work is needed to fully address the challenge of adversarial fragility. Continued research in areas like dimensionality reduction, interpretability, and novel attack methods will be crucial for developing neural network models that are truly reliable and trustworthy, with the potential to have a profound impact on a wide range of real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
The Double-Edged Sword of Input Perturbations to Robust Accurate Fairness
Xuran Li, Peng Wu, Yanting Chen, Xingjun Ma, Zhen Zhang, Kaixiang Dong
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are known to be sensitive to adversarial input perturbations, leading to a reduction in either prediction accuracy or individual fairness. To jointly characterize the susceptibility of prediction accuracy and individual fairness to adversarial perturbations, we introduce a novel robustness definition termed robust accurate fairness. Informally, robust accurate fairness requires that predictions for an instance and its similar counterparts consistently align with the ground truth when subjected to input perturbations. We propose an adversarial attack approach dubbed RAFair to expose false or biased adversarial defects in DNN, which either deceive accuracy or compromise individual fairness. Then, we show that such adversarial instances can be effectively addressed by carefully designed benign perturbations, correcting their predictions to be accurate and fair. Our work explores the double-edged sword of input perturbations to robust accurate fairness in DNN and the potential of using benign perturbations to correct adversarial instances.
4/3/2024
Exploring DNN Robustness Against Adversarial Attacks Using Approximate Multipliers
Mohammad Javad Askarizadeh, Ebrahim Farahmand, Jorge Castro-Godinez, Ali Mahani, Laura Cabrera-Quiros, Carlos Salazar-Garcia
0
0
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have advanced in many real-world applications, such as healthcare and autonomous driving. However, their high computational complexity and vulnerability to adversarial attacks are ongoing challenges. In this letter, approximate multipliers are used to explore DNN robustness improvement against adversarial attacks. By uniformly replacing accurate multipliers for state-of-the-art approximate ones in DNN layer models, we explore the DNNs robustness against various adversarial attacks in a feasible time. Results show up to 7% accuracy drop due to approximations when no attack is present while improving robust accuracy up to 10% when attacks applied.
4/19/2024
Adversarial Attacks and Dimensionality in Text Classifiers
Nandish Chattopadhyay, Atreya Goswami, Anupam Chattopadhyay
0
0
Adversarial attacks on machine learning algorithms have been a key deterrent to the adoption of AI in many real-world use cases. They significantly undermine the ability of high-performance neural networks by forcing misclassifications. These attacks introduce minute and structured perturbations or alterations in the test samples, imperceptible to human annotators in general, but trained neural networks and other models are sensitive to it. Historically, adversarial attacks have been first identified and studied in the domain of image processing. In this paper, we study adversarial examples in the field of natural language processing, specifically text classification tasks. We investigate the reasons for adversarial vulnerability, particularly in relation to the inherent dimensionality of the model. Our key finding is that there is a very strong correlation between the embedding dimensionality of the adversarial samples and their effectiveness on models tuned with input samples with same embedding dimension. We utilize this sensitivity to design an adversarial defense mechanism. We use ensemble models of varying inherent dimensionality to thwart the attacks. This is tested on multiple datasets for its efficacy in providing robustness. We also study the problem of measuring adversarial perturbation using different distance metrics. For all of the aforementioned studies, we have run tests on multiple models with varying dimensionality and used a word-vector level adversarial attack to substantiate the findings.
4/4/2024
Robust width: A lightweight and certifiable adversarial defense
Jonathan Peck, Bart Goossens
0
0
Deep neural networks are vulnerable to so-called adversarial examples: inputs which are intentionally constructed to cause the model to make incorrect predictions or classifications. Adversarial examples are often visually indistinguishable from natural data samples, making them hard to detect. As such, they pose significant threats to the reliability of deep learning systems. In this work, we study an adversarial defense based on the robust width property (RWP), which was recently introduced for compressed sensing. We show that a specific input purification scheme based on the RWP gives theoretical robustness guarantees for images that are approximately sparse. The defense is easy to implement and can be applied to any existing model without additional training or finetuning. We empirically validate the defense on ImageNet against $L^infty$ perturbations at perturbation budgets ranging from $4/255$ to $32/255$. In the black-box setting, our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art, especially for large perturbations. In the white-box setting, depending on the choice of base classifier, we closely match the state of the art in robust ImageNet classification while avoiding the need for additional data, larger models or expensive adversarial training routines. Our code is available at https://github.com/peck94/robust-width-defense.
5/28/2024